Mercury phase

Using Langmuir s principle of independent surface action, make qualitative calculations and decide whether the polar or the nonpolar end of ethanol should be oriented toward the mercury phase at the ethanol-mercury interface. 

Fig. 5 shows data from a simulation of TIP4P water that is confined on both sides by a rhombohedral mercury crystal with (111) surface structure. Bosio et al. [135] deduce from their X-ray studies that a solid o-mercury lattice with a larger lattice constant in the z direction may be used as a good structural model for liquid mercury. Thus, the mercury phase was modeled as a rigid crystal in order to simplify the simulations. The surface of such a crystal shows rather low corrugation. 

Pc- (c) Dipole density p. (d) Water contribution to the surface potential x calculated from the charge density Pc by means of Eq. (1). All data are taken from a 150 ps simulation of 252 water molecules between two mercury phases with (111) surface structure using Ewald summation in two dimensions for the long-range interactions. 

If the reductant is insoluble in water but soluble in the mercury phase (amalgam formation), equation (7) still holds. Substituting in equation (3), we have ... 

Krabbenhoft DP, Hurley JP, Olson ML, Cleckner LB. 1998b. Diel variability of mercury phase and species distributions in the Florida Everglades. Biogeochemistry 40 311-325. 

Other Phenomena Interaction of metallic Pb in the mercury phase [38] and amalgam decomposition in alkaline medium [39] have also been discussed. Formation of anodic monolayer PbCOs or Pb3(C03)2(0H)2 on Pb(Hg), depending on pH, in carbonate or bicarbonate solutions, has been detected using electrochemical methods (chronoamper-ometry and linear sweep voltammetry) and powder X-ray diffractometry [40]. 

One may think of the reduction of an organic substance to a less-stable product which is subsequently protonated or rearranged to form a non-oxidizable species B [21, 22], or the formation of metallic compounds in the mercury phase. 

Stordal, M.C., Gill, G.A., Wen, L.S., and Santschi, P.H. (1996) Mercury phase speciation in the surface waters of three Texas estuaries importance of colloidal forms. Limnol. 

The superscripts in Eqs. IIH, 12H, and the following equations, indicate the phase in which a given species is found. When a species exists in only one phase, the superscript is omitted Equation IIH follows from the fact that electrons in the mercury phase and in the copper wire connected to it are at equilibrium. Also, the chemical potential of mercury is equal to the sum of the electrochemical potentials of its components. 

At the same time, hydrogen evolution occurs at the graphite surfaces, which provide the electrons for this process by the direct contact with the mercury phase, which simultaneously generates hydroxide ions in solution (Eq. 8.44). 

The calomel electrode is based on reaction (9.2.42). Insoluble mercury(I) chloride (calomel) lies on top of the liquid mercury phase and ensures that the solution is saturated with Hg2. The potential of the electrode depends on the chloride ion activity as follows ... 

The components of the metal (mercury) phase are mercury and excess electrons. In solution, there are water molecules, K" " ions, and CP ions. The ions are chosen as separate components, so that their individual surface excesses may be assessed. However, it is understood that their bulk concentrations cannot be different, so that other constraints appear in the thermodynamic description. 

The two metals were mutually saturated by gentle rocking in a thermostat for at least 24hours before use. The saturated phases were used for all measurements. (The mercury phase contains about 1.3% gallium, and the gallium phase about 5.8% mercury at 25°C. [2,15].)... 

The lower figure applied to glass previously exposed to the mercury phase, and the higher, to glass previously exposed to the gallium phase.)... 

Investigations on Different Mercury-Phases in Soils of a Mercury-Mining Area by a Pyrolysis Technique... 

Mercury phases, determined by TCP, give only information about the relative (thermal) bonding strength of Hg in soils. In order to get more information about... 

Allard B, Arsenic I (1991) Abiotic reduction of mercury by humic substances in aquatic system. An important process for the mercury cycle. Water Air Soil Poll. 56 457-464 Anderson A (1979) Mercury in soils. In Nriagu JW (ed.) The biochemistry of mercury in the environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 79-112 Azzaria LM, Aftabi A (1991) Stepwise thermal analysis technique for estimating mercury phases in soils and sediments. Water Air Soil Poll 56 203-217 Azzaria LM (1967) A Method of determining traces of mercury in geologic materials. Geol Surv Can, pp 66-54. 

In other cases, the method of removal depends upon the nature of the product, e.g. gases may be (1) vented from the reactor, possibly via a slight reduction In pressure (2) displaced from the electrolyte via inert gas sparging (3) segregated via a solid polymer electrolyte (section 5.2) or recirculated via a gas-liquid separator. Liquid products may be (1) separated by flotation or settlement if they are immiscible and have a markedly different density to the electrolyte or (2) emulsified by mixing, then swept out of the reactor. Solid products can be separated via (I) flotation or settlement (2) fluidization or tangential shear to remove them from the reactor (3) solvent extraction or incorporation into a mercury phase, e.g. amalgamation of metals. 

---