Mechanism photoreactions

Catalysis (qv) refers to a process by which a substance (the catalyst) accelerates an otherwise thermodynamically favored but kiaeticahy slow reaction and the catalyst is fully regenerated at the end of each catalytic cycle (1). When photons are also impHcated in the process, photocatalysis is defined without the implication of some special or specific mechanism as the acceleration of the prate of a photoreaction by the presence of a catalyst. The catalyst may accelerate the photoreaction by interaction with a substrate either in its ground state or in its excited state and/or with the primary photoproduct, depending on the mechanism of the photoreaction (2). Therefore, the nondescriptive term photocatalysis is a general label to indicate that light and some substance, the catalyst or the initiator, are necessary entities to influence a reaction (3,4). The process must be shown to be truly catalytic by some acceptable and attainable parameter. Reaction 1, in which the titanium dioxide serves as a catalyst, may be taken as both a photocatalytic oxidation and a photocatalytic dehydrogenation (5). 

The mechanisms of photoreactivity of coordination compounds limiting cases of decay on a specific nuclear coordinate (dosenco) or via random coordinate selection (dercos). B. R. Hollebone, C. H. Langford and N. Serpone, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1981, 39,181-224 (95). 

The mechanism for this photoreaction has not been elucidated, although it has been ascertained that these products are not observed in the dark reaction with acetone under the same conditions as used in the photolysis. The source of the isopropylidene unit is undetermined, but since all extraneous organic sources were excluded in the experiment, it seems clear that it originates from the azulene system itself, presumably from the five-membered ring. 

Investigation of the photochemistry of protonated durene offers conclusive evidence that the mechanism for isomerization of alkyl-benzenium ions to their bicyclic counterparts is, indeed, a symmetry-allowed disrotatory closure of the pentadienyl cation, rather than a [a2a -f 7r2a] cycloaddition reaction, which has been postulated to account for many of the photoreactions of cyclohexadienones and cyclohexenones (Woodward and Hoffmann, 1970). When the tetramethyl benzenium ion (26) is irradiated in FHSO3 at — 90°, the bicyclo[3,l,0]hexenyl cation (27) is formed exclusively (Childs and Farrington, 1970). If photoisomerization had occurred via a [(r2a-t-772 ] cycloaddition, the expected... 

In this chapter the topochemical [2+2] photoreactions of diolefin crystals are reviewed from the viewpoints of organic photochemistry, analysis of reaction mechanism, and crystallography as well as in terms of synthetic polymer chemistry and polymer physics. 

Assuming that the reaction probability of all the elementary processes is equal in the reaction of 1,4-DCB crystals, the calculated yields of unreacted 1,4-DCB, cyclophane, and oligomer by simulation, should be 1.8, 37.7, and 60.5% by weight, respectively. Furthermore, if all the photoexcited species of the monocyclic dimer are assumed to be converted into cyclophane, these yields should become 6.9, 65.6 and 27.5%. It is, therefore, rather surprising that in an extreme case of the experiment the yield of cyclophane is more than 90% while the amount of unreacted 1,4-DCB is less than 2%. One plausible mechanism to explain this result is that the first formation of cyclophane induces the successive formation of cyclophane so as to enhance its final yield. If such an induction mechanism plays an appreciable role, an optically active cyclophane zone may be formed, at least in a micro spot surrounding the first molecule of cyclophane, as illustrated in Scheme 13. The assumption of an induction mechanism was verified later in the photoreaction of 7 OMe crystals (see p. 151). 

The reaction of CpFe(CO)2Me with R3SiH gives the bis(silyl)hydride complex 21. Photoreaction of 21 in DMF afforded the corresponding disiloxane (Scheme 52). We believe that the oxygen in the disiloxane is derived from DMF, because NMes is concomitantly formed in this reaction. It is considered that the silyl species a, which is prepared via reductive elimination of RsSiH from 21 in situ, is the active species within the catalytic cycle. Therefore, the generation of a bis(silyl)hydride species is the dormant step. We are currently studying the details of the reaction mechanism. 

Typically, the reaction mechanism proceeds as follows [6], By photoreaction, two chlorine radicals are formed. These radicals react with the alkyl aromatic to yield a corresponding benzyl radical. This radical, in turn, breaks off the chlorine moiety to yield a new chlorine radical and is substituted by the other chlorine, giving the final product. Too many chlorine radicals lead to recombination or undesired secondary reactions. Furthermore, metallic impurities in micro reactors can act as Lewis catalysts, promoting ring substitution. Friedel-Crafts catalyst such as FeClj may induce the formation of resin-Uke products. 

Not all sensitized photochemical reactions occur by electronic energy transfer. Schenck<77,78) has proposed that many sensitized photoreactions involve a sensitizer-substrate complex. The nature of this interaction could vary from case to case. At one extreme this interaction could involve a-bond formation and at the other extreme involve loose charge transfer or exciton interaction (exciplex formation). The Schenck mechanism for a photosensitized reaction is illustrated by the following hypothetical reaction ... 

Thus far in this book we have discussed one- or two-component photochemical systems which because of their relative simplicity lend themselves quite well to laboratory study. Consequently the mechanisms of many of the photoreactions we have discussed have been elucidated in exquisite detail. As we turn our attention in this chapter to some photochemical aspects of living systems, we shall find much more complex situations in which mechanistic details are just now beginning to be obtained. In some systems, such as those which exhibit phototaxis or phototropism, so little is known that our treatment must as a consequence be limited to only a brief discussion of these phenomena. The topics we will consider here are photosynthesis, vision, phototaxis and phototropism, and damage and subsequent repair of damage by light. Due to space limitations, a discussion of the very fascinating area of bioluminescence must be omitted. 

All of these uses are based on the behavior of titanium dioxide as a semiconductor. Photons having energies greater than v 3.2 eV (wavelengths shorter than 400 nm) produce electron/hole separation and initiate the photoreactions. Electron spin resonance (esr) studies have demonstrated electron capture by adsorbed oxygen to produce the superoxide radical ion (Scheme 1) (11). Superoxide and the positive hole are key factors in photoreactions involving titanium dioxide reported here are the results of attempts to alter the course of these photoreactions by use of metal ions and to understand better the mechanisms of these photoreactions. 

Reaction (70) in the dark has been discussed in the literature (1) from the viewpoint of the electronic theory of catalysis. The photoreaction (70) has also been considered in the literature (8), though briefly and purely qualitatively. In the present article we shall proceed from the mechanism which has been discussed in the literature (1) as one of the possible mechanisms. Let us examine the influence of illumination on the rate of the reaction [see reference (47) ]. 

The photoreaction of oxidation of water was discovered in 1927 by Baur and Neuweiler (76) and investigated later by a number of workers. The analysis of experimental results performed by Korsunovsky (65-68) is based on the exciton mechanism of light absorption. The kinetics of the reaction has been investigated by Grossweiner (77). 

Another approach aiming at the mechanism of the primary photoreaction was undertaken by Lang-Feulner and Rau107). They incubated mycelia of Fusarium in photodynamically active (methylene blue, toluidine blue, neutral red) or inactive... 

Irradiation of diphenyl N(p-nitrophenyl) cyclopropenone imine (268) gave, in a clear-cut photoreaction, the phenanthreno indenone imine 275170) resulting from two units of 268 by loss of two hydrogens and p-nitrophenyl isocyanide the mechanism of this transformation has not yet been elucidated. 

Psoralens can react by two different routes upon photoactivation (Parsons, 1980 Pathak, 1984). The first route is through the well-known photoreaction mechanism that principally involves intercalation within double-stranded DNA or RNA with the formation of adducts with adjacent thymine bases. The furan-side and pyrone-side rings in psoralen both can form cycloaddition products with the 5,6-double bond of thymine to create a crosslink between two DNA strands (Reaction 57) or to a lesser extent, within double-strand regions of RNA. 

The photoreactions of R(R )C=CHSnBu3 with mercurial compounds of the type Q2Hg or QHgCl also result in substitution35. Once again a radical chain mechanism is postulated, as outlined in Scheme 4. 

The photochemical decomposition of Mes3GeHgCl was studied by Castel and coworkers107. The main photoreaction is the ejection of Hg, and the formation of Mes3GeCl, presumably via an intramolecular mechanism. A number of other reactions are observed, however, all occurring via formation of Mes3Ge-. The photochemistry is summarized in Scheme 28, with the reactions being followed by E.S.R. and N.M.R. spectroscopies. 

Characterization of the surface impurities on the catalyst is also essential, and photoreactivity data should be analyzed in terms of active and accessible surface area. The defect state of the surface and nanostructure are also important aspects to understand. Current advances in the synthesis allow preparing Titania or titanate nanorods with different diameter and aspect ratio, and different surface nanostructure as well. Limiting the discussion here to only preparations by hydrothermal treatment (for reasons of conciseness), various mechanisms of growing of the nanorods has been reported. The differences in the mechanism of formation would imply differences in the surface characteristics of the nanorods, but there is no literature available on this topic. 

Extended irradiation of the diethyl dithioacetal 44 increases the yield of L-fucitol (46) at the expense of 1-S-ethyl-l-thio-D-galactitol (45) also galactitol (52) was isolated from the photolysis mixture.109 The intermediacy of 45 in the formation of 46, a possibility that was suggested by the extended photolysis of 44, is supported by the observation that irradiation of 45 in methanol produces L-fucitol (46) in 44% yield.109 (Compounds 47 and 52 also are formed during irradiation of 45, but in low yield.) The mechanism for sulfide photoreaction parallels that109 for the alkyl dithioacetals (see Scheme 18). 

An alternative mechanism occurs for concerted photoreactions in which the bond-breaking and bond-forming processes occur together. Such reactions proceed via a single transition state ... 

The mechanism for the photoreaction between 133 and cyclohexene can be summarized as in Scheme 8. The initiating electron transfer fluorescence quenching of 133 by cyclohexene resulted in the formation of an w-amino radical-radical cation pair 136. Proton transfer from the 2-position of the cyclohexene radical cation to the nitrogen atom of the a-amino radical leads to another radical cation-radical pair 137. Recombination of 137 at the radical site affords the adduct 134, while nucleophilic attack at the cation radical of 136 leads to another radical pair 138 which is the precursor for the adduct 135. 

---