Mechanical impact blending

The second step is a mechanical impact blending process (termed dry impact blending) of the interactive mixture for the preparation of the composite or encapsulated particles. An impact-type hybridization machine with jacket was used (Hybridizer type-0, Nara Machinery Co. Ltd., Tokyo the system is now patented). Figure 13.3.3 is a schematic diagram of the machine for producing the mechanical impacts. A thermometer was set in the circulation route to measure the inner atmospheric temperature of the machine. 

Two commercially significant graft copolymers are acrylonitrile—butadiene—styrene (ABS) resins and impact polystyrene (IPS) plastics. Both of these families of materials were once simple mechanical polymer blends, but today such compositions are generally graft copolymers or blends of graft copolymers and homopolymers. 

Unlike simple mixtures of polystyrene and polybutadiene such blends can be thermoplastically processed without phase separation ( splicing ) Furthermore, they can to a certain extent withstand mechanical impact without disintegration. This is because the above-mentioned graft polymers function also as compatibilizer at the borderline of the hard phase and the rubber-elastic dispersed phase (already at concentrations below 3%). 

On the other hand, some mechanically compatible blends as well as some dispersed two-phase systems have made respectable inroads into the commercial scene. Many of these are blends of low-impact resins with high-impact elastomeric polymers examples are polystyrene/rubber, poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile) /rubber, poly (methyl methacrylate) /rubber, poly (ethylene propylene)/propylene rubber, and bis-A polycarbonate/ ABS as well as blends of polyvinyl chloride with ABS or PMMA or chlorinated polyethylene. 

Since the early 1990s, the constrained geometry metallocene catalysts have been used by Dow to produce either alternating or pseudo-random ethylene-co-styrene interpolymers (ESI) (Stevens et al. 1991). ESI with up to 50 wt% styrene is semicrystalline it is known to compatibilized PE/PS blends since it forms domain structures into which the homopolymers can dissolve. ESI also has good melt strength, mechanical, impact, and damping characteristics (Ellebrach and Chum 1998). Flow and processing information on ESI were pubUshed (Karjala et al. 1998). 

Most of the polymer s characteristics stem from its molecular stmcture, which like POE, promotes solubiUty in a variety of solvents in addition to water. It exhibits Newtonian rheology and is mechanically stable relative to other thermoplastics. It also forms miscible blends with a variety of other polymers. The water solubiUty and hot meltable characteristics promote adhesion in a number of appHcations. PEOX has been observed to promote adhesion comparable with PVP and PVA on aluminum foil, cellophane, nylon, poly(methyl methacrylate), and poly(ethylene terephthalate), and in composite systems improved tensile strength and Izod impact properties have been noted. 

To introduce some interfacial physico-chemical linkage between EVA and PRP, blends were made by adding different quantities of M AH-PP. Some results are demonstrated in Table 12, The physico-mechanical properties of the PRP-EVA compositions modified with MAH-PP showed that properties are influenced by MAH-PP concentration. Compositions with better impact strength and improved brittleness can be prepared by varying the modifier concentration. Tensile strength and elongation are not significantly influenced by the addition of a modifier. An increase in the modifier con-... 

A study on the effectiveness of the E-plastomers as impact modifiers for iPP was carried out in relation to the traditional modifier EPDM. In this study, the flow properties of the E-plastomer-iPP and EPDM-PP blends were also evaluated. The blends were analyzed by solid-state 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, microscopy (SEM), and DSC. The results showed that E-plastomer-PP and EPDM-PP blends present a similar crystallization behavior, which resulted in a similar mechanical performance of the blends. However, the E-plastomer-PP blend presents lower torque values than the EPDM-PP blend, which indicates a better processibility when E-plastomer is used as an impact modifier for iPP. 

---