Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Measuring vapours

The assessment of risks from vapours requires the site to be comprehensively characterised in terms of the contamination below the site, because the most common models used in the risk assessment process (e.g. Johnson and Ettinger) are based on modelling the phase partitioning of the contaminant between the soil or aqueous phase and the vapour phase. Vapour monitoring results are not normally used directly in the risk assessment. The results can, however, be used to help validate the results of a risk assessment. [Pg.63]

Monitoring of vapours inside buildings can also be carried out using sorption tubes that are fixed to walls and left in situ for a period of time before being removed and taken to a laboratory for testing. [Pg.63]


The portion BC is so characteristic that this procedure gives a very accurate method of measuring vapour-pressures. [Pg.172]

The technique is useful in that only small amounts of the sample polymer are needed, though experimentally it is time-consuming and may require great patience in use. This is because the technique does not measure equilibrium vapour-pressure lowering, but measures vapour-pressure lowering in a steady-state situation. Thus care must be taken to ensure that time of measurement and droplet size are standardised for both calibration and sample measurement. [Pg.83]

It is, however, pertinent to mention here that GLC has a much greater application in the field of pharmaceutical analysis which extends over to most organic constituents that have a measurable vapour present at the temperature employed. [Pg.432]

The use of a quartz crystal microbalance for measuring vapour backstreaming from mechanical pumps Vacuum, Volume 16 (11), 633-637,1966... [Pg.187]

Note that, if the reacting system has a wide boiling range, the measured vapour pressure data will be different to that for the relieving reactor. The composition for the relieving reactor will change due to the preferential vaporisation of the most volatile component(s), but this will not be the case for the closed calorimetric test. [Pg.142]

A considerable number of alternative techniques have been suggested for measuring vapour permeability of plastics, generally with the aim of making the measurement more convenient and increasing sensitivity. For water vapour transmission, carrier gas type commercial apparatus using an infrared sensor is now commonly used. This procedure is standardised in ASTM... [Pg.359]

For good reasons, ionic liquids are often discussed as solvents for a Greener Chemistry [16]. In contrast to volatile organic solvents and extraction media, they have no measurable vapour pressure. Therefore there is no loss of solvent through evaporation. Environmental and safety problems arising through the use of volatile organic solvents can be avoided. [Pg.107]

Several studies have measured vapour pressures of the FTOHs [59,64, 71-73] (Table 3.2) however, reported values are variable, differing by several orders of magnitude. Vapour pressures of the FTOHs are influenced by the length of the perfluoroalkyl chain, and increase as length of the perfluoroalkyl chain decreases. Reported vapour pressures of the FTOHs, at 25 °C, range from minimum values of 0.2 Pa (10 2 FTOH) to 216 Pa (4 2 FTOFl) reported by Krusic et al. [72] to maximum values of 53 Pa (10 2 FTOH) to 1670 Pa (4 2 FTOH) reported by Lei et al. [71]. [Pg.37]

Two studies [71, 74] in the peer-reviewed literature have investigated the vapour pressures of the FSAs (Table 3.2). Similar to the FTOHs, reported values are variable, differing by several orders of magnitude. The vapour pressure of NEtFOSE has also been determined by the 3M Company [75]. It is possible that some of the difficulties encountered in measuring vapour pressures of the FTOHs are also applicable to the FSAs. [Pg.37]

Kahlbaum<5 emphasised the effects on the boiling-point of cohesion between the parts of the liquid and the adhesion of the liquid to the vessel. He at first postulated a difference between the temperature of bubble formation ( Koch-punkt ) and the temperature at which the vapour pressure is equal to the superincumbent pressure ( Siedepunkt ), in which case the static and dynamic methods of measuring vapour pressure would not give the same results. Ramsay and Youngs showed, however, that Kahlbaum s results were due to the use of... [Pg.275]

Structure 5 is one example of a number of dipyridones that incorporate different spacer groups.Since 5 was designed to be self-complementary, it was anticipated that it would self-associate to produce a dimer of type 6. Indeed, this was shown to be so in chloroform (> 90% dimer) by means of vapour pressure osmometry. X-Ray crystallography also confirmed that the dimer persists in the solid state. The behaviour of 5 contrasts markedly with that of 7 which was designed to be complementary only in an offset manner, such that linear polymerisation might be promoted. Under the dilute conditions of measurement, vapour pressure osmometry indicated that this species remains predominantly monomeric in chloroform however. X-ray diffraction confirmed that 7 adopts the linear polymeric structure illustrated by 8 in the solid state. As anticipated, since self-association involves hydrogen bonding, both 5 and 7 were shown to exist only as monomers in the pro-tic solvent methanol. [Pg.23]

We shall now consider solutions of two substances, both of which have a measurable vapour pressure, such as mixtures of water and alcohol, or of two other volatile, miscible liquids. Let the vapour pressure of the liquid A be P , that of P be Pj, and let the vapour pressure of the solution be P. P is then... [Pg.232]

Compound Measured vapour pressure (Pa) Calculated evaporation time (s) ... [Pg.42]

Just as in 7 of chapter XX we can show that it is sufficient to know the activity coefficient of one component of a binary solution in order to calculate the activity coefficient of the other. This fact is of importance when only one of the two components has a measurable vapour pressure. [Pg.341]

The rationale for using Hg as a pathfinder element in mineral exploration is attractive. Because of its volatility, Hg is presumed to form broader halos in the hypogene environment than most elements. It is envisaged that both vapour-phase and solution transport are responsible for a wide dispersion of the element. In the secondary environment it is well known that Hg exerts a measurable vapour pressure at ambient temperatures and possesses redox properties that allow the metal to exist in the elemental state under a range of natural conditions. Therefore it has been claimed that, as a host sulphide-body weathers, it can be expected that Hg will be converted partly to the vapour state, thereby overcoming the constraint of hydromorphic or solution dispersion that applies to other target and indicator elements. Vapour-phase dispersion through permeable rock or cover would allow Hg to be detected in soil or soil gas, and perhaps as an atmospheric anomaly. [Pg.395]

The vapour pressure measurements are of very low quality as shown by the condition that the pressures measured at 1473 K vary by a factor of 18. Furthermore, the pressure expression above does not reproduce the measured vapour pressures listed in Table 2 of the paper. The pressures in this table were used by the review in a re-evaluation which yielded completely unreasonable results. The work is therefore rejected. [Pg.510]

The vapour pressure of MoSe2(cr) was studied in the temperature range 1600 to 1750 K but the decomposition products are unknown. Therefore, the measured vapour pressures cannot be used for an evaluation of thermodynamic properties. [Pg.573]

Sano [37SAN] and Auftfedic, Carel and Weigel [72AUF/CAR], reported measurements of the vapour pressure of water over Ni(N03)2 6H20(cr) as a function of temperature (Figure V-39). The measured vapour pressures differ systematically by a factor of 1.5 at similar temperatures. Sano interpreted his results in terms of the reaction ... [Pg.198]

From eqns. (77) and (78), the vapour cloud parameters n and A can be also obtained by variation of the coefficients. Fig. 49 shows the measured vapour distribution curves of aluminium obtained by evaporations with a standard commercially available 270° bent electron beam gun. A 12kW, lOkV electron beam power supply and a quartz crystal thickness and rate monitor were used [256]. At an aluminium evaporation rate of 1.8 nm s 1, the cosine exponent equals n = 2.3 with no isotropic component A = 0. With increasing rate the exponent increases and also the isotropic component appears. With rates of 10.5 and 81.4 nm s"1 the corresponding characteristic data are n = 4, A = 0.14 and n = 5.8, A = 0. 14. [Pg.201]


See other pages where Measuring vapours is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.236]   


SEARCH



Measurement of saturated vapour pressures

Measurement of the vapour pressure

Vapour permeation measurements

Vapour pressure measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info