Measurable attributes

The inherent limitations of attribute data prevent their use for preliminary statistical studies since specification values are not measured. Attribute data have only two values (conforming/nonconforming, pass/fail, go/no-go, present/absent) but they can be counted, analyzed, and the results plotted to show variation. Measurement can be based on the fraction defective, such as parts per million (PPM). While variables data follows a distribution curve, attribute data varies in steps since you can t count a fraction. There will either be zero errors or a finite number of errors. 

Mendeleev s genius lay in recognizing that just as It was the element in the abstract sense that survived intact in the course of compound formation, so atomic weight was the only quantity that survived in measurable amounts. He therefore took the step of associating these two features an element was to be characterized by its atomic weight. In a sense an abstract element had acquired a single measurable attribute that would remain unchanged... 

If we consider the possibility that among the numerous measurable attributes that human beings possess there may be many which are not mathematically correlated, we are confronted with an idea which is opposed to the basic dichotomy of normal and abnormal mentioned above. If 0.95 of the population is normal with respect to one... 

Acceptance Criteria/Rationale. The acceptance criteria for each measurable attribute (which can be lifted from the specification document) is important and should always be shared. Likewise, it is recommended that a rationale be provided for each criteria. For example, why must the final product moisture content be 70-80% What if it is 83% The reasoning is that it is better to consider this question before being asked by FDA during an audit, thereby avoiding a situation in which the answer provided may not be the best. 

Keeney and Raiffa (1976, pp. 66-130) describe several ways of how to construct such value functions. If no directly measurable attributes exist for an objective, a scale that maps verbal descriptions with a numerical value indicating the decision maker s strength of preference has to be defined. The MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique) procedure offers a pairwise comparison approach to support constructing such a scale (cf. Bana e Costa et al. 2005). 

Despite its importance in ecosystem C fluxes, soil respiration has limitations as a constraint on SOM turnover, for two main reasons. First, it is difficult to partition soil respiration into its two sources (1) decomposition of SOM by microbes (heterotrophic respiration) and (2) respiration from live plant roots (autotrophic respiration) (Kuzyakov, 2006). As a result, an increase in soil respiration may indicate not only an increase in SOM decomposition but also an increase in root respiration. Second, it is likely that in most soils only a small fraction of total SOM contributes to heterotrophic respiration. As a result, respiration measurements provide information about the dynamic fraction of SOM (particularly when combined with 14C measurements of respiration) but do not provide information about the large, stable pools unless they are destabilized and contribute to respiration (detectable with 14C02 respiration measurements). Attributing the sources of respiration from different SOM reservoirs, which may respond differently to climatic variables, is not... 

Availability of a well-designed and descriptive analytical plan that is appropriate given the design, level of measurement, attributes of variables, and underlying statistical assumptions. 

Statistical analysis, as applied to production or other processes in which quantities of materials are continuously being tested or measured, is known as quality control. In this statistical method, some measurable attribute of the processed material is used as a criterion of the quality of the product. Random samples are drawn from the production line in succeeding time intervals, and the means of small groups of these samples are compared with some standard. Statistical methods, particularly the t-test, provide a method of determining when the measured mean differs from the control value by an amount greater than would be expected by chance. 

Attribute data were identified from the photomicrographs of each location point in the sample, and each potential categorical variable (attribute) was recorded as present or absent. Because it was desirable to determine whether the evidence at the location points was related, the data were subjected to hierarchical clustering. The measure of dissimilarity used in the project was the number of matches among attribute measurements that two location points shared. For example, two points had a dissimilarity of 0 if they matched on all attribute measurements, and at the other extreme, the two location points had a dissimilarity of 13 (the total number of measured attributes) if they did not match on any of the measurements. Each match was weighed as equally important. In addition to this intuitive measure of... 

Equation IV.3 suggests that there is some function of the system that has an extremum at equilibrium. In other words, we might be able to find some expression determined by the parameters describing the system whose derivative is zero at equilibrium. If so, the abstract statement that the entropy of the universe is a maximum at equilibrium could then be replaced by a statement referring only to measurable attributes of the system—easily measurable ones, we hope. 

No measurements attributable to (3) appear to have been made. 

The design of health surveys, consisting of scales measuring attributes of a person or a population s health, are supported by underlying theory known as psychometric theory.Health status scales development can also be viewed as a unique application of the design and theory that support the creation of educational measurements (e.g.. Standardized Achievement Tests). A person who studies these theories and conducts research or measurement of... 

Structure is an average structure which is taken up by molecular systems as they pass from reactant to product it cannot be studied in the same way as for a molecule because it is not a discrete species and cannot be isolated even in principle (see Chapter 1). It is impossible to measure attributes of the transition structure in the same way that can be done for regular collections of molecules. Since the transition state can be considered as if it were an equilibrium state it is possible to define its effective charges in the same way as those just considered for reactant and product molecules in equilibrium reactions. Equation (28) has rate constants for breakdown of the transition state species (represented as J ) forward kf) and return kf) which are essentially invariant because they register the collapse of the transition structure. These rate constants are independent of substituent changes and are therefore associated with zero P values. The equilibrium constants for formation of the transition state kfk and for its breakdown to products kjk f vary only according to changes in k and A , . 

Figure 1. Plot of log Ks4(Al(OH)3) versus the reciprocal of absolute temperature, in which solubility measurements attributed to gibbsite are compared. The experimental precision of the solubility measurements produces a maximum 2a uncertainty of < 0.1 in log Ks4 and < 4K in temperature.

Quality and quantity of any crop determine its price in the market place. Although quantity is readily measurable, quantity in units of weight or volume, quality is a less readily measurable attribute. Quality pertains to the characteristics of the commodity and varies somewhat according to the perceptions of different individuals. Nevertheless, grades and standards can and have been established for numerous products to describe their quality characteristics. Many current grades and standards including those for peanut crops, are not as useful as they could be, because they do not accurately de.scribe the essential quality characteristics of the product concerned ( ). 

Ravden and Johnson (1989) evaluate usabihty of human computer interfaces. They identify nine top-level attributes visual clarity, consistency, compatibility, informative feedback, explicitness, appropriate functionality, flexibility and control, error prevention and correction, and user guidance and support. They disaggregate each into a number of more measurable attributes. These attributes can be used as part of a standard multiple-attribute evaluation. 

Continuing the characterization of materials by measurable attributes, the ignitibility of single substances exposed to air or other gases will be described, as well as the behavior of fuel-oxidizer mixtures under various conditions leading to initiation—heat, static ela -tricity, impact, and friction. Destructive influences, especially of moisture and other external factors comprising the broad field of surveillance and surveillance testing, will be described. 

Here, the first question seems to be the easiest to answer. It is, however, not possible to directly measure the reliability of a system. This has to be derived as an indirect measure from some directly measurable attributes of the software system. To derive the indirect measures of reliability from the directly measurable attributes, software reliability models are used. Examples of directly measurable attributes are the time between failures and the number of failures in a certain time period (see Fig. 11). 

FIGURE 11 The reliability can be derived from directly measurable attributes via a software reliability model. 

Generally, n test objects are given withp measured attributes and for some of them it is not known, which group they belong to (in dependence on the chosen model). Let the measured attributes he represented by the / -dimensional random vectors Xi,..., X and the classification of the /-th object let he expressed by the random variable Yi, which takes the value 0 or 1 according to its group membership. Let such a random vector he marked X and random variable Y for a new object that should be classify in terms of the generated decision rule. 

The next step involves defining the benefits and costs involved from the perspective of each stakeholder. These benefits and costs define the attributes of interest to the stakeholders. Usually, a hierarchy of benefits and costs emerges with more abstract concepts at the top (e.g., viability, acceptability, and validity), and concrete measurable attributes at the bottom. 

---