Mass-balance constraints

The constraints considered in the mathematical formulation are divided into two modules. The first deals with the mass balance constraints and the second with the sequencing and scheduling constraints. The mass balance constraints for the case where there is no central storage are slightly different to those for the case where there is. The mass balances for each are described in the mass balance module below. The sequencing and scheduling module will be described, for both cases, in a subsequent section. The nomenclature for all the sets, variables and parameters can be found in the nomenclature list. 

6 Wastewater Minimisation in Multipurpose Batch Plants Multiple Contaminants 

The outlet concentration of each contaminant c in unit j cannot exceed its maximum limit as stated in constraints (6.6). Constraints (6.7) ensures that the total water into a unit j does not exceed the maximum allowable for the operation in unit j. Constraints (6.8) restricts the mass of water recycled into the unit j to the maximum allowable water for the operation in unit j. Constraints (6.9) stipulates that the inlet concentration for contaminant c into unit j cannot exceed its upper limit. 

The maximum amount of water used by a unit is determined using constraints (6.10). This amount is used as the limit in constraints (6.8) and (6.9). In a multiple contaminant system there exists a limiting component for each operation in each unit. The limiting component is the component that requires the largest amount of water to remove the required mass load and still comply with the maximum inlet and outlet concentrations. For a certain operation in a certain unit there could exist multiple limiting components, however, the amount of water required by each will be the same. It is important to note that when the maximum amount of water is used, the concentration of the non-limiting components will be below their respective maxima. 

The above mass balance constraints suffice for the case where there is no intermediate storage available for wastewater. The mass balance constraints necessary for the case where there is a central storage vessel available for wastewater are presented in the following section. 

The traditional modeling approach in biochemistry is differential equation-based enzyme kinetics. Consequently, the majority of this book so far has been devoted to kinetic modeling. Many examples demonstrate the power and feasibility of kinetic modeling applied to a few enzymatic reactions at a time. It remains to be demonstrated, however, that that approach can be effectively scaled up to an in vivo system of hundreds of reactions and species with thousands of parameters [194], More importantly, it is clear that the kinetic approach is not yet feasible for many large systems simply because the necessary kinetic information is not yet available. 

---

Mass Balance Constraints. Erom the schematic diagram of a continuous crystallizer shown ia Eigure 11, the foUowiag mass balance on solute can be constmcted ... 

Mass Balance Constraints Including Central Storage... 

Mass balance constraints (6.1), (6.3) and (6.5) need to be reformulated to account for the water from storage. The water into a unit in this case is not only comprised of freshwater and directly recycled/reused water, but also water from storage. This... 

The mass balance constraints given above would suffice if the process were continuous. However, due to the fact that the processes dealt with are batch processes, additional constraints are required to capture the discontinuous nature of the process. This implies that the time related constraints are necessary. 

Apart from the mass balances associated with water, one also has to consider a product mass balance. Constraint (7.11) states that the amount of product leaving a unit is the amount of raw material that entered the unit less the total contaminant mass load transferred to the water stream. 

The constraints that comprise the mathematical formulation are presented in two modules. The first deals with the mass balance constraints and the second the scheduling constraints. 

The first constraints that are dealt with in the zero effluent scheduling formulation are the unit mass balance constraints. These constraints account for the movement of mass between the various units and storage vessels. 

The synthesis model is based on the zero effluent scheduling formulation with the addition of design specific constraints. The scheduling constraints used in the synthesis formulation are identical to those used in the scheduling formulation and the mass balance constraints are virtually identical except for a few minor changes in the limiting capacities, amount of water and amount of product. These changes will be discussed below. 

The first minor change to the mass balance constraints from the scheduling formulation is found in constraint (8.2), which defines the size of a batch. In the synthesis formulation, the batch size is determined by the optimal size of the processing unit. Due to this being a variable, constraint (8.2) is reformulated to reflect this and is given in constraint (8.59). The nonlinearity present in constraint (8.59) is linearised exactly using Glover transformation (1975) as presented in Chapter 4. 

The mathematical formulation comprises of a number of mass balance constraints and scheduling constraints. The derivation of each of the constraints in the formulation is done considering a superstructure depicting the processes concerned. The sets, variables and parameters used in this chapter are all described in the nomenclature list. 

Mass balance constraints are derived around each processing unit and the central storage vessel. The mass balance constraints around a processing unit are presented... 

Mass Balance Constraints for a Processing Unit Operating in Inherent... 

The mass balance constraints around the central storage vessel are given in constraints (9.17), (9.18), (9.19), (9.20), (9.21), (9.22), (9.23) and (9.24). These constraints are very similar to those presented by Majozi (2005) and will therefore not be discussed in great detail. 

The linear mass balance constraints that represent the process are ... 

Alternatively, we may assume that there exists some (but possibly limited) knowledge about the typical concentrations involved. For each metabolite, we can then specify an interval St < S1- <. S ) that defines a physiologically feasible range of the respective concentration. Furthermore, the steady-state flux vector v° is subject to the mass-balance constraint Nv° = 0, leaving only r — rank(N) independent reaction rates. Again, an interval v(. < v9 < v+ can be specified for all independent reaction rates, defining a physiologically admissible flux space. 

Leitch, C.H.B. Lentz, D.R. 1994. The gresen approach to mass balance constraints of alteration systems methods, pitfalls, examples. In Lentz, D.R., ed) Alteration and Alteration processes associated with Ore-forming systems. Geological Association of Canada, Short Course Notes, 11, 161-192. Lentz, D.R. 1995. Preliminary evaluation of six in-house rock geochemical standards from the Bathurst Camp, New Brunswick. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Minerals and Energy Division, Miscellaneous Report 18, p. 81-89. 

Elucidation of the origin of sulfur in volcanic systems is complicated by the fact that next to SO2, significant amounts of H2S, sulfate and elemental sulfur can also be present. The bulk sulfur isotope composition must be calculated using mass balance constraints. The principal sulfur gas in equilibrium with basaltic melts at low pressure and high temperature is SO2. With decreasing temperature and/or increasing... 

---