Many-Electron Theoretical Models

Many-electron models give a better description of the change of electronic state induced by the electron transfer process, because they are able to account for effects involving a large set of valence electrons. However, the functions vl/3 and vj/b are then necessarily antisymmetric with respect to these electrons, so that the calculations become much more complicated than in one-electron treatments. 

To illustrate this antisymmetrizing procedure, let us derive the equivalent to expression (21) for the system represented in Fig. 3, where the donor and the acceptor are represented by the molecular orbitals cp and (p. respectively, and each bridging unit by a doubly occupied molecular orbital (p and a vacant orbital cpj. The Hamiltonian of the system is written  

Owing to the interactions between adjacent orbitals along the bridge, these charge-transfer states are mixed with Oj, and The initial and final states are then taken in the form  

The preceding many-electron formulation is useful to separate the different contributions to T b, and could be easily improved to include the whole set of valence electrons of the system. However, it is not certain that this method is the most convenient for the effective calculation of the electronic factor. Actually, in the very few many-electron calculations that have been reported in the literature, Tjb was evaluated globally. These studies are summarized below. 

Larsson and co-workers have used relation (18) to calculate Tjb for organic molecules in which two centers are bridged by saturated groups [65,66], and for mixed valence systems [67]. The stationary states /i and /2 are determined by a CNDO/S method, with extensive configuration interaction and use of semi-empirical parameters. The nuclear configuration Q where relation (18) is valid is adjusted so as to satisfy the delocalization property expressed by (17). These 

---

Much of the experimental work in chemistry deals with predicting or inferring properties of objects from measurements that are only indirectly related to the properties. For example, spectroscopic methods do not provide a measure of molecular stmcture directly, but, rather, indirecdy as a result of the effect of the relative location of atoms on the electronic environment in the molecule. That is, stmctural information is inferred from frequency shifts, band intensities, and fine stmcture. Many other types of properties are also studied by this indirect observation, eg, reactivity, elasticity, and permeabiHty, for which a priori theoretical models are unknown, imperfect, or too compHcated for practical use. Also, it is often desirable to predict a property even though that property is actually measurable. Examples are predicting the performance of a mechanical part by means of nondestmctive testing (qv) methods and predicting the biological activity of a pharmaceutical before it is synthesized. 

Our present views on the electronic structure of atoms are based on a variety of experimental results and theoretical models which are fully discussed in many elementary texts. In summary, an atom comprises a central, massive, positively charged nucleus surrounded by a more tenuous envelope of negative electrons. The nucleus is composed of neutrons ( n) and protons ([p, i.e. H ) of approximately equal mass tightly bound by the force field of mesons. The number of protons (2) is called the atomic number and this, together with the number of neutrons (A ), gives the atomic mass number of the nuclide (A = N + Z). An element consists of atoms all of which have the same number of protons (2) and this number determines the position of the element in the periodic table (H. G. J. Moseley, 191.3). Isotopes of an element all have the same value of 2 but differ in the number of neutrons in their nuclei. The charge on the electron (e ) is equal in size but opposite in sign to that of the proton and the ratio of their masses is 1/1836.1527. 

Many of the initial theoretical models used to vahdate the concept of coherent control and optimal control have been based on the interaction of the electric field of the laser light with a molecular dipole moment [43, 60, 105]. This represents just the first, or lowest, term in the expression for the interaction of an electric field with a molecule. Many of the successful optimal control experiments have used electric fields that are capable of ionizing the molecules and involve the use of electric field strengths that lead to major distortions of the molecular electronic structure. With this in mind, there has been discussion in the... 

Both theoretical and experimental evidence suggest that the precise nature of the charge carriers in conjugated polymer systems varies from material to material, and it is still a subject of debate in many cases. A discussion of the various theoretical models for the electronic structure of conjugated polymers is given below, using polyacetylene and poly(paraphenylene) as examples. More detailed information on these materials and the applicability of these theoretical models is given in subsequent sections. 

The electronic structure of the atoms. The electronic structure of the atoms of the different elements and their relation to the characteristics of the Periodic Table are based on a number of experimental data and theoretical models which are fully discussed in many elementary and advanced texts of inorganic chemistry such as Cotton et al. (1999), Greenwood and Earnshaw (1997), Huheey etal. (1997), Wells (1984). 

The reader is also referred to the innovative nonphotochemical electron transfer studies of Weaver et al. [147], These authors have been exploring dynamical solvent effects on ground state self-exchange kinetics for or-ganometallic compounds. This work has explored many aspects of solvent control on intermediate barrier electron transfer reactions, including the effect on a distribution of solvation times. The experimental C(t) data on various solvents have been incorporated into the theoretical modeling of the ground state electron transfer reactions studied by Weaver et al. [147]. 

Many-body calculations which go beyond the Hartree-Fock model can be performed in two ways, i.e. using either a variational or a perturbational procedure. There are a number of variational methods which account for correlation effects superposition-of-configurations (or configuration interaction (Cl)), random phase approximation with exchange, method of incomplete separation of variables, multi-configuration Hartree-Fock (MCHF) approach, etc. However, to date only Cl and MCHF methods and some simple versions of perturbation theory are practically exploited for theoretical studies of many-electron atoms and ions. 

The data of atomic spectroscopy are of extreme importance in revealing the nature of quantum-electrodynamical effects. For the investigation of many-electron atoms and ions, it is of great importance to combine theoretical and experimental methods. Therefore, the methods used must be universal and accurate. A number of physical characteristics of the many-electron atom (e.g., a complete set of quantum numbers) may be found only on the basis of theoretical considerations. In many cases the mathematical modelling of physical objects and processes using modern computers may successfully replace the corresponding experiments. In this book we shall describe the contemporary state of the theory of many-electron atoms and ions, the peculiarities of their structure and spectra as well as the processes of their interaction with radiation, and some applications. 

The development of design guidelines for molecules with large second hyperpolarizability, 7, is more difficult because of uncertainty in whether few or many state models are appropriate [24-28]. Some effects, such as saturation of 7 with chain length, can be addressed with one-electron hamiltonians, but more reliable many-electron calculations (already available for (3) are just beginning to access large 7 materials [24,35-38]. Theoretical and experimental work in this area should hold some interesting surprises. 

The first ionization potential refers to the most weakly bound electron of the neutral molecule in the dilute gaseous phase, i.e. the energy liberated by removing an electron from the highest occupied orbital. Several experimental methods are available for measuring these for molecules and theoretical models can be set up so as to correlate them. Other ionization potentials may similarly be observed if, instead, an electron from an inner orbital is removed from the neutral molecule. Thus a molecule will have as many ionization potentials as occupied orbitals. 

---