Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Random phase approximation with

Many-body calculations which go beyond the Hartree-Fock model can be performed in two ways, i.e. using either a variational or a perturbational procedure. There are a number of variational methods which account for correlation effects superposition-of-configurations (or configuration interaction (Cl)), random phase approximation with exchange, method of incomplete separation of variables, multi-configuration Hartree-Fock (MCHF) approach, etc. However, to date only Cl and MCHF methods and some simple versions of perturbation theory are practically exploited for theoretical studies of many-electron atoms and ions. [Pg.16]

To account for the interchannel coupling, or, which is the same, electron correlation in calculations of photoionization parameters, various many-body theories exist. In this paper, following Refs. [20,29,30,33], the focus is on results obtained in the framework of both the nonrelativistic random phase approximation with exchange (RPAE) [55] and its relativistic analogy the relativistic random phase approximation (RRPA) [56]. RPAE makes use of a nonrelativistic HF approximation as the zero-order approximation. RRPA is based upon the relativistic Dirac HF approximation as the zero-order basis, so that relativistic effects are included not as perturbations but explicitly. Both RPAE and RRPA implicitly sum up certain electron-electron perturbations, including the interelectron interaction between electrons from... [Pg.23]

Wendin, G. The random phase approximation with exchange. In Photoionization and other probes of many-electron interactions. Wuilleumier, F. (ed.), pp. 61-84. NATO Advanced Study Institute Series. New York Plenum Press 1976... [Pg.117]

An important advantage of hrst method is the possibility of using different expressions for the atomic potential, and the calculations can be done not only for a purely Coulomb interaction, but in the multiconhguration interaction approximation, the Hartree-Fock-Dirac approximation, and the relativistic random phase approximation with exchange effects. The most exact relativistic calculations were done in [12] for the polarizability of the ground state of a helium-like atom. [Pg.757]

Local random phase approximation with projected oscillator orbitals... [Pg.99]

During this same period theoretical techniques which can account for electron correlations have been developed and refined. Many calculations have been carried out using many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), R-matrix theory,6 the random phase approximation with exchange (RPAE), and other related techniques. This article will focus on nonrelativistic calculations since relativistic calculations such as the RRPA will be covered in the article by W, Johnson in this volume. [Pg.305]

Saue and Jensen used linear response theory within the random phase approximation (RPA) at the Dirac level to obtain static and dynamic dipole polarizabilities for Cu2, Ag2 and Au2 [167]. The isotropic static dipole polarizability shows a similar anomaly compared with atomic gold, that is, Saue and Jensen obtained (nonrelativ-istic values in parentheses) 14.2 for Cu2 (15.1 A ), 17.3 A for Ag2 (20.5 A ), and 12.1 A for Au2 (20.2 A ). They also pointed out that relativistic and nonrelativistic dispersion curves do not resemble one another for Auz [167]. We briefly mention that Au2 is metastable at 5 eV with respect to 2 Au with a barrier to dissociation of 0.3 eV [168, 169]. [Pg.198]

In order to calculate in the framework of Random Phase Approximation the intensity 1(6) of scattering at angle 6 of the incident radiation with wavelength X. recourse should be made to the formula [31]... [Pg.164]

In the self-consistent field linear response method [25,46,48] also known as random phase approximation (RPA) [49] or first order polarization propagator approximation [25,46], which is equivalent to the coupled Hartree-Fock theory [50], the reference state is approximated by the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field wavefunction < scf) and the set of operators /i j consists of single excitation and de-excitation operators with respect to orbital rotation operators [51],... [Pg.474]

The vertical IPs of CO deserve special attention because carbon monoxide is a reference compound for the application of photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) to the study of adsorption of gases on metallic surfaces. Hence, the IP of free CO is well-known and has been very accurately measured [62]. A number of very efficient theoretical methods specially devoted to the calculation of ionization energies can be found in the literature. Most of these are related to the so-called random phase approximation (RPA) [63]. The most common formulations result in the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster (EOM-CC) equations [59] and the one-particle Green s function equations [64,65] or similar formalisms [65,66]. These are powerful ways of dealing with IP calculations because the ionization energies are directly obtained as roots of the equations, and the repolarization or relaxation of the MOs upon ionization is implicitly taken into account [59]. In the present work we remain close to the Cl procedures so that a separate calculation is required for each state of the cation and of the ground state of the neutral to obtain the IP values. [Pg.93]

In the 1950s, many basic nuclear properties and phenomena were qualitatively understood in terms of single-particle and/or collective degrees of freedom. A hot topic was the study of collective excitations of nuclei such as giant dipole resonance or shape vibrations, and the state-of-the-art method was the nuclear shell model plus random phase approximation (RPA). With improved experimental precision and theoretical ambitions in the 1960s, the nuclear many-body problem was born. The importance of the ground-state correlations for the transition amplitudes to excited states was recognized. [Pg.14]

We presented fully self-consistent separable random-phase-approximation (SRPA) method for description of linear dynamics of different finite Fermi-systems. The method is very general, physically transparent, convenient for the analysis and treatment of the results. SRPA drastically simplifies the calculations. It allows to get a high numerical accuracy with a minimal computational effort. The method is especially effective for systems with a number of particles 10 — 10, where quantum-shell effects in the spectra and responses are significant. In such systems, the familiar macroscopic methods are too rough while the full-scale microscopic methods are too expensive. SRPA seems to be here the best compromise between quality of the results and the computational effort. As the most involved methods, SRPA describes the Landau damping, one of the most important characteristics of the collective motion. SRPA results can be obtained in terms of both separate RPA states and the strength function (linear response to external fields). [Pg.147]

In a model in which a random phase approximation would be valid, all pv would vanish. It is therefore appropriate to consider pv as expressing the correlations in the system while p0 refers to the vacuum of correlations, We shall illustrate the theory with the example of an atom in interaction with a radiation field. (For more details, see Henin.12) Then the quantum-mechanical version of Eq. (7) is ... [Pg.22]


See other pages where Random phase approximation with is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.1416]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.62]   


SEARCH



Phase approximation

Random phase

Random phase approximation with photoionization

Relativistic random phase approximation , with

© 2024 chempedia.info