Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Macroscopic polarization behavior

Polarized Light Screen (PLS). The PLS technique (23,24) was used extensively to obtain Immediate information about the macroscopic phase behavior of solutions. Diffuse light is transmitted through a polarizer and an analyzer. The sample is placed between the two polarizers, and system behavior is observed as shown in Figure 1. [Pg.226]

Pyro- and Piezoelectric Properties The electric field application on a ferroelectric nanoceramic/polymer composite creates a macroscopic polarization in the sample, responsible for the piezo- and pyroelectricity of the composite. It is possible to induce ferroelectric behavior in an inert matrix [Huang et al., 2004] or to improve the piezo-and pyroelectricity of polymers. Lam and Chan [2005] studied the influence of lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate (PMN-PT) particles on the ferroelectric properties of a PVDF-TrFE matrix. The piezoelectric and pyroelectric coefficients were measured in the electrical field direction. The Curie point of PVDF-TrFE and PMN-PT is around 105 and 120°C, respectively. Different polarization procedures are possible. As the signs of piezoelectric coefficients of ceramic and copolymer are opposite, the poling conditions modify the piezoelectric properties of the sample. In all cases, the increase in the longitudinal piezoelectric strain coefficient, 33, with ceramic phase poled) at < / = 0.4, the piezoelectric coefficient increases up to 15 pC/N. The decrease in da for parallel polarization is due primarily to the increase in piezoelectric activity of the ceramic phase with the volume fraction of PMN-PT. The maximum piezoelectric coefficient was obtained for antiparallel polarization, and at < / = 0.4 of PMN-PT, it reached 30pC/N. [Pg.543]

This area of research has seen an explosion of interest in recent years and has been well reviewed by others [39 1]. This extra element in the assembly of these mesogens is responsible for a number of interesting polar properties in this class of materials [42], As shown in Figure 4(b), the oxo-metal compounds provide a dipole moment to many of these mesogens. This allows them to transfer their oxygen atoms between members of the stack to switch the macroscopic polarity [42], Some have shown ferroelectric behavior [42] that is possibly due to the inability to pack opposing dipoles in a hexagonal lattice [43]. [Pg.574]

The purpose of this Chapter is to describe the dielectric properties of liquid crystals, and relate them to the relevant molecular properties. In order to do this, account must be taken of the orientational order of liquid crystal molecules, their number density and any interactions between molecules which influence molecular properties. Dielectric properties measure the response of a charge-free system to an applied electric field, and are a probe of molecular polarizability and dipole moment. Interactions between dipoles are of long range, and cannot be discounted in the molecular interpretation of the dielectric properties of condensed fluids, and so the theories for these properties are more complicated than for magnetic or optical properties. The dielectric behavior of liquid crystals reflects the collective response of mesogens as well as their molecular properties, and there is a coupling between the macroscopic polarization and the molecular response through the internal electric field. Consequently, the molecular description of the dielectric properties of liquid crystals phases requires the specification of the internal electric field in anisotropic media which is difficult. [Pg.264]

This behavior is also known in the solid state, e.g., in the chiral structure NaN02, and the order is called helicoidal antiferroelectric. A shorter useful name is helielec-tric. The helielectric smectic C has zero macroscopic polarization (like an antiferroelectric), no hysteresis, no threshold, and no bistability. However, by an artifice it can be turned into a structure with very different properties. This is illustrated in Fig. 16. If the smectic layers are made perpendicular to the confining glassplates, there is no boundary condition compatible with the... [Pg.1562]

This article has investigated the potential of cross-linked polyamides for tribological applications. Results have shown a significant influence of the structural properties decrease in crystallinity, cross-linking particularly within quasi-amorphous or less crystalline ranges and the formation of a three-dimensional network. This shows up in the macroscopic material behavior increased insolubility, increased elastic modulus, particularly in the glass transition region, increased stiffness, brittleness, reduced creep and an increase in surface polarity. [Pg.1583]

The macroscopic property of interest, e.g., heat of vaporization, is represented in terms of some subset of the computed quantities on the right side of Eq. (3.7). The latter are measures of various aspects of a molecule s interactive behavior, with all but surface area being defined in terms of the electrostatic potential computed on the molecular surface. Vs max and Fs min, the most positive and most negative values of V(r) on the surface, are site-specific they indicate the tendencies and most favorable locations for nucleophilic and electrophilic interactions. In contrast, II, a ot and v are statistically-based global quantities, which are defined in terms of the entire molecular surface. II is a measure of local polarity, °fot indicates the degree of variability of the potential on the surface, and v is a measure of the electrostatic balance between the positive and negative regions of V(r) (Murray et al. 1994 Murray and Politzer 1994). [Pg.71]

Since P must remain normal to z and n, the polarization vector forms a helix, where P is everywhere normal to the helix axis. While locally a macroscopic dipole is present, globally this polarization averages to zero due to the presence of the SmC helix. Such a structure is sometimes termed a helical antiferroelectric. But, even with a helix of infinite pitch (i.e., no helix), which can happen in the SmC phase, bulk samples of SmC material still are not ferroelectric. A ferroelectric material must possess at least two degenerate states, or orientations of the polarization, which exist in distinct free-energy wells, and which can be interconverted by application of an electric field. In the case of a bulk SmC material with infinite pitch, all orientations of the director on the tilt cone are degenerate. In this case the polarization would simply line up parallel to an applied field oriented along any axis in the smectic layer plane, with no wells or barriers (and no hysteresis) associated with the reorientation of the polarization. While interesting, such behavior is not that of a true ferroelectric. [Pg.468]

Figure 8.20 Structure and phase sequence of prototypical bent-core mesogen NOBOW (8) are given, along with space-filling model showing one of many conformational minima obtained using MOPAC with AMI force field. With observation by Tokyo Tech group of polar EO switching for B2 smectic phases formed by mesogens of this type, banana LC field was bom. Achiral, polar C2v layer structure, with formation of macroscopic spontaneous helix in polarization field (and concomitant chiral symmetry breaking), was proposed to account for observed EO behavior. Figure 8.20 Structure and phase sequence of prototypical bent-core mesogen NOBOW (8) are given, along with space-filling model showing one of many conformational minima obtained using MOPAC with AMI force field. With observation by Tokyo Tech group of polar EO switching for B2 smectic phases formed by mesogens of this type, banana LC field was bom. Achiral, polar C2v layer structure, with formation of macroscopic spontaneous helix in polarization field (and concomitant chiral symmetry breaking), was proposed to account for observed EO behavior.
The solvation of polyatomic ions or polar neutral molecules is even more difficult to describe. There are two sources of additional problems first of all, the symmetry of the system under investigation is drastically reduced and hence the number of different configurations increases tremendously. Furthermore, the strength of the electric field is much smaller than in the case of monatomic ions with spherical symmetry and therefore the dynamic behavior of the solvation shell is even more important for a priori calculations of macroscopic properties. [Pg.11]

Let us try and understand this. As stated, Ni plating baths (as well as other acidic baths such as those of Cu and Zn) show poor throwing power. This is so because their CE values are =100% at the low and high current density values, and so macroscopic irregularities on a cathode will lead to nonuniform deposits. Alkaline baths, on the other hand, have a better macro throwing power. This is the case since, in order to remain in solution in such a bath, the metal ion, to be deposited, must be present in complex ions. These ions, in turn, encounter high concentration polarization. Also, in most complex baths the deposition potentials are amenable to hydrogen evolution, which competes with metal deposition such that CE falls as current density is increased. That kind of behavior results in a more uniform deposit on... [Pg.201]

The nonlinearity may be of microscopic or macroscopic origin. The polarization density P = Np is a product of the individual dipole moment p, which is induced by the applied electric field E, and the density of dipole moments N. The nonlinear behavior may have its origin in either p or N. [Pg.94]

As discussed below, ionic liquids often behave comparably to conventional polar organic solvents [6, 8, 10]. But the physics underlying solvation are entirely different. As noted above, ILs are characterized by considerable structural and dynamic inhomogeneity, and even simple concepts, such as the dipole moment, cannot be productively applied. We are therefore in the unusual position of needing to explain how an exotic microscopic environment produces conventional macroscopic behavior. To this end, we will review empirical characterizations of the ionic liquid environment, and then turn our attention to the underlying physics of solute-solvent interactions. [Pg.107]


See other pages where Macroscopic polarization behavior is mentioned: [Pg.268]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.1178]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.1553]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.113]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.268 ]




SEARCH



Macroscopic behavior

© 2024 chempedia.info