Computable Quantities

However, many successful chemical models exist that do not necessarily have obvious connections with quantum mechanics. Typically, these models were developed based on intuitive concepts, i.e., their forms were determined inductively. In principle, any successful model must ultimately find its basis in quantum mechanics, and indeed a posteriori derivations have illustrated this point in select instances, but often the form of a good model is more readily grasped when rationalized on the basis of intuitive chemical concepts rather than on the basis of quantum mechanics (the latter being desperately non-intuitive at first blush). 

we shall leave quantum mechanics largely unreviewed in the next two chapters of this text, focusing instead on the intuitive basis for classical models falling under the heading of molecular mechanics . Later in the text, we shall see how some of the fundamental approximations used in molecular mechanics can be justified in terms of well-defined approximations to more complete quantum mechanical theories. 

What predictions can be made by the computational chemist In principle, if one can measure it, one can predict it. In practice, some properties are more amenable to accurate computation than others. There is thus some utility in categorizing the various properties most typically studied by computational chemists. 

---

This computed quantity is also sometimes synonymously referred to as the total dissociation energy IDg). 

Finally, we show that the second-order coupling between direct tunneling transitions is subdominant to the already computed quantities. Consider an interaction of the form yy l,-2 )(2,l + H.C. If one repeats simple-mindedly the steps leading to Eq. (75), one obtains the following simple expression for the free energy correction due to interaction between the underlying structural transitions ... 

Once we have the smoothed values of the state variables, we can proceed and compute 22. All these computed quantities (rji, r 2, linear least squares regression. In Figure 7.1 the original data and their smoothed values are shown for 3 different values of the smoothing parameter "s" required by CSSMH. An one percent (1%) standard... 

The macroscopic property of interest, e.g., heat of vaporization, is represented in terms of some subset of the computed quantities on the right side of Eq. (3.7). The latter are measures of various aspects of a molecule s interactive behavior, with all but surface area being defined in terms of the electrostatic potential computed on the molecular surface. Vs max and Fs min, the most positive and most negative values of V(r) on the surface, are site-specific they indicate the tendencies and most favorable locations for nucleophilic and electrophilic interactions. In contrast, II, a ot and v are statistically-based global quantities, which are defined in terms of the entire molecular surface. II is a measure of local polarity, °fot indicates the degree of variability of the potential on the surface, and v is a measure of the electrostatic balance between the positive and negative regions of V(r) (Murray et al. 1994 Murray and Politzer 1994). 

A or As). It is necessary to first establish a reliable experimental database for the property of interest, and then to fit it, by means of a statistical analysis code, to (usually) three or four of the quantities, appropriately selected, as computed for the molecules in the database. If the interaction involves multicomponent systems, as does solvation, then only one component may vary. For example, a relationship could be developed for a series of solutes in a particular solvent, or a given solute in different solvents. In doing so, we have always sought to use as few of the computed quantities as is consistent with a good correlation, since they can provide insight into the physical factors that are involved in the interaction this becomes obscured if many terms are involved. 

VSjmax and Vs,mm are site-specific, in that they refer to a particular point on the surface. (In rare instances, we have also used Vmm, the overall most negative value of the electrostatic potential in the three-dimensional space of the molecule Vmn is also site-specific.) The remaining quantities in Eq. (9) are termed global, since they reflect either all or an important portion of the molecular surface. It should be emphasized that on no occasion have we used more than six computed quantities in representing a property three or four is typical. It should also be noted that the specific value of p(r) chosen to define the molecular surface is not critical, as long as it corresponds to an outer contour we have shown that p(r) = 0.0015 or 0.002 au would be equally effective.35,38 (The numerical coefficients of the computed quantities would of course be somewhat different, but the correlation would not be significantly affected.)... 

The preceding is meant to be merely a representative calculation of am. If instead a lens is interposed between source and entrance slit, am will obey a different expression. The essential point is that om is a computable quantity, whatever the setup. 

The difference between the computed quantities for the molecule and its constituent atoms is then added to the experimental quantity associated with the atoms to determine the final dieoretical value. 

At this point it is useful to discuss how we can best quantify any errors in our calculations. Let us suppose we have a computed quantity i = l,n for each of n molecules or properties, and a set of reference results Ff, i = l,n. These may be obtained from reliable experiments or highly accurate calculations the source is not important for our reasoning. A popular approach to estimating uncertainty in results is by using the root-mean-squaxe (RMS) error... 

The most widely computed quantity by DMC approaches is the total energy. Following are a couple of findings that provide insight on the capability of the DMC method. 

FIGURE 8. General Interaction Properties Function (GIPF)72, with physical interpretations for the respective computed quantities... 

Deciding where to stop is therefore almost completely a matter for the judgement of the user of a method. He must himself determine convergence conditions which are sufficient for his needs. These conditions must not be so slack that he stops too far from a minimum nor so strong that he wastes time computing quantities made up mostly of rounding and truncation errors. 

In general, the solution of system [50a] requires 0(n3) operations, and the multiplication in [50b] demands 0(n2) work however, the updating context of these problems can be used to formulate recursive lower-cost solutions in terms of previously computed quantities. Such formulas may update the factors of the previously decomposed matrix, or use an iteration process based on the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formula6 for (B + uvT)-1 in combination with a recursive process suggested by Matthies and Strang.124 The second procedure [50b] is generally preferred in large-scale applications, as it is computationally more economical. 

An essential rule is that descriptors should be calculated by the same level of theory for all molecules in a given data set. Trends in computed quantities have a chance to be consistent within a given computational method but not across different methods. For example, AMI and MNDO atomic charge values may differ but within the framework of either method the relative order of numerical values may be similar. 

While gas phase work on the h5q5erpolarizability of small molecules has been relatively free of problems concerned with the definitions of measured quantities and their formal relationship to computed quantities, the same cannot be said about solution studies of rather larger organic species. It is the latter that possess the very large nonlinear response functions that are of greatest interest. The prototype system for such studies has been 4-nitroaniline (pNA) and this review is mainly concerned with the relation between the measurements, in vacuo and in solution, of the hyperpolarizabilities of pNA and the closely related molecule, MNA (2-methyl, 4-nitroaniline) to ab initio and DFT calculations of these quantities. 

To a solution of 100 g tropine in 2 kg glacial acetic acid, which is warmed up continuously to 60 to 70°, one adds dropwise in the solution of 48 g chromic acid in 50 g water and 250 g glacial acetic acid under steady agitating by means of turbine. After registering the oxidant the solution short time is warmed up to 100° and separated with an excess of caustic soda in concentrated aqueous solution. From the alkaline liquid the tropinone is extracted with ether. Tropinone is obtained by evaporation of ether. The yield amounts to over 80 percent the computed quantity. Source Willstatter 1896... 

---