Lost time system

Emphasis for prevention will be on changing individual behavior by symbolic or tangible rewards based on statistical evidence from the data collection system. "Hard" performance indicators such as lost time incidents will therefore be preferred to "softer" data such as near-miss reports. Accident prevention will also emphasize motivational campaigns designed to enhance the awareness of hazards and adherence to rules. If a severe accident occurs, it is likely that disciplinary sanctions will be applied. 

Finally, let us underline an important feedback loop starting at the real-time system and ending at the tool preparation station, which contains the real-time tool status, wear, and part priority information. These data are often useful to those people and/or system software systems that deal with the generation of the production rule base. It is also a very useful data set for FMS designers, since a lot of data which would previously have been lost will be saved in this way. 

The desire to predict the future often leads to collecting a large amount of information based on the hope that something useful will be obtained and noticed. The NASA Space Shuttle program was collecting six hundred metrics a month before the loss of Columbia. Companies often collect data on occupational safety, such as days without a lost time accident, and they assume that these data reflect on system safety [17], which of course it does not. Not only is this misuse of data potentially misleading, but collecting information that may not be indicative of real risk diverts limited resources and attention from more effective risk-reduction efforts. 

A system operates for 5,000 hours and then fails. The repair takes 100 hours to complete. Hence, the availability of the item is (4900/5000) or 98.0%. Management decides that they would like the availability figure to rise to 99.0%. There are two ways of doing this. The first option is to increase run times to 10,000 hours while maintaining the same 100-hour lost time for repairs. The second option is to reduce the repair time from 100 hours to 50 hours. Both approaches generate 99.0% availability. In practice, it may often turn out that it is much easier to improve repair times than to increase run times between failures. 

If the probability of a failure can be calculated as something less than one (i.e., 100%), then it follows that the probability of success is equal to one minus the probability of failure. In a previous example, the probability of experiencing a lost-time injury was calculated at. 02. The probability of having no lost-time injuries is equal to 1 —. 02, or. 98 (a 98% chance that no lost time injuries will occur). This ability to provide management with projected failure AND success rates for a given operation, task, system, and so on, demonstrates the advantage of using probability theory in system or project analysis. 

In conclusion, solvent instability or unique solvent properties may result in situations where the sample, solvent, column, or system integrity may be jeopardized. An understanding of the solvent and its potential chemical reactivities will save the chromatographer hours of lost time and avoid inaccurate or incorrect results. 

When it comes to eye injuries, immediate treatment is the best defense against long-term vision loss and lost time at work. Employers that choose the proper eyewash fluid and delivery system can not only reduce the severity of eye injuries but also the direct and indirect costs related to them. 

The Business Results through Health and Safety Guidebook, a work of Canadian Manufacturers Exporters—Ontario Division and the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board issued in 2001 demonstrates the business case for workplace health and safety and reflects the experience of Ontario businesses. The publication says The average workplace lost time injury in Ontario costs over 59,000. The average lost time workers compensation claim cost is over 11,771. Note If you round up 11,771 to 11,800, you will find that a 4-to-l multiplier was used to get to 59,000. The 4-to-l ratio is recommended in the Guidebook within a cost computation system for employers to use.)... 

The accident investigation should be used to generate recommendations but should also be used to generate safety awareness. The investigation report or a summary should therefore be circulated locally to relevant people and, when appropriate, summaries circulated throughout the organization. The accident does not need to have resulted in a three-day lost time injury for this system to be used. 

DOD is committed to keeping workers safe from preventable injuries, and has embraced the safety and health management system approach through its participation in OSHA s Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP). The leaders of our armed forces understand that employees are critical to mission readiness, and recognize the link between lost time injuries and illnesses and lost productivity. 

Figure 2.6.11 shows data from an organisation using the self-assessment system outlined above. Graphs of this sort can demonstrate correlations between lost time accident levels and self-assessment scores. A manager who takes the right actions in a structured approach to health and safety should produce an improved accident performance. 

It was suggested that various data banks in Sweden could be a useful source of data. In particular those operated by the Swedish Labour Inspection Service at Vasteras and ASEA the robot manufacturers were identified as possible sources of data. Contact has been made with both and a visit was made by two members of WGl to negotiate access to the data. The data in these banks is structured to provide statistics on lost time accidents at the work place and mainly provided Information on the extent of injury and time lost rather than full details of the system involved and the real cause. 

---