Losses trace analysis

Volatile analytes. As residue analysis is also trace analysis in the lower ppm (mg kg ) to ppb ( ug kg ) range, concentration steps usually involve evaporation of solvents (sometimes with traces of water present) to near dryness. The volatility of analytes can be deduced from their elution temperatures in GC, and thus whenever an analyte elutes from a nonpolar GC phase of film thickness <0.25 qm below approximately 150 °C, losses due to co-evaporation during concentration by the rotary evaporator or by a stream of nitrogen need to be avoided. 

Splitless Trace analysis (ppb) possible Cold trapping and solvent effects provide sharp peaks More complex than split Limited to temperature programming Several parameters to optimize Loss of low-volatility, labile analytes... 

The following examples illustrate the range of apphcations of LC/MS for trace analysis of explosives ESI-LC/MS/MS-CID fragmentation processes of a series of nitroaromatic, nitramine and nitrate ester explosives were studied in the negative-ion mode using daughter-ion, parent-ion and neutral loss scans [14]. Table 1 shows the CID daughter ions in ESI-MS/MS of TNT. 

For liquids and solid samples, the obvious concentration techniques familiar to all chemists are extraction, evaporation of the matrix, distillation, and precipitation. For trace analysis, extraction and/or evaporation of the matrix are generally the only two of these techniques likely to avoid severe losses of the component sought. 

Trace analysis has its special hazards for the unwary. The most important of these are loss of material in the analytical process and contamination by outside sources. Everyone realizes that trace constituents can be lost from samples, but few are aware of the many ways in which this can occur. For example, phosphate has been observed to disappear mysteriously from water samples in polyethylene bottles (10). Nitric acid, used to clean plastic vials, has been observed to convert these surfaces to ion exchangers, which readily take up as much as 10 12 moles per sq. cm. of trace metals (16). Lead nitrate solutions unless made distinctly acidic, plate out much of the lead on the walls of glass bottles. While everyone realizes that formation of a precipitate is liable to carry out trace constituents either by adsorption or occlusion, it is not as well-known that vanishingly small amounts of precipitates—amounts likely to be overlooked on casual observation—may also do this. The fly-ash and soot, which seem to be inescapable components of city air,... 

The few articles currently available regarding trace analysis without preconcentration, use in general the graphite furnace technique [102,120, 138] with sample sizes of the order of microliters, and deal with the elements Sb [47, 83], Pb and Bi [48-50], As, Sb, Bi, Sn, Cd, Pb [10, 57, 116] as well as Al, Cr, Sn [6, 62], Co, and Mg [104]. Alkaline earths can be determined directly with the flame method [122, 147], Further techniques of atomic absorption by flame use concentration methods, for example for the determination of small concentrations of tin [17], Te [26], Co, Pb, and Bi [104], and W [106]. From the analytical viewpoint, it is only useful to remove the iron matrix. The extraction of the elements to be determined from the matrix always carries with it the danger of losses and therefore results showing concentrations that are too low. 

Column efficiency can affect S/N measurements therefore analysts should account for both the type and the age of the column when determining the LOD. The maintenance status of chromatographic components (e.g., detectors and injectors) will also affect the ability to measure limits.In trace analysis, the LOD is greatly influenced by the recovery of the compound adsorption to glassware, instability or volatility, incomplete reaction (during derivatization), and poor laboratory technique are some of the causes of sample loss during analysis. 

The belief that the isolation of macrocomponents from solution as sparingly soluble compounds is inadmissible in trace analysis, because of the considerable losses of traces caused by adsorption, is not necessarily true if the precipitation is done in acid medium. This has been confirmed in the following examples. 

It is possible to produce artificial matrix materials [12]. Such materials can be prepared on a mass basis by weighing all components both to mimic the matrix composition and the content of trace elements or trace organic substances. The materials could help to have matrix materials available for which the exact contents and composition are known. As a consequence it would be, in theory, possible to certify them on a mass basis and validate methods with highly traceable materials. In organic trace analysis this would circumvent the unknown extraction step. In reality, this is much more difficult to achieve than can be expected. The real matrix composition of many materials is unknown — in particular for environment samples. The physico-chemical status of the various substances depends on the history of the material. Therefore, various natural samples of expected similar composition are different in behaviour. In addition, when preparing mixtures of solid components, losses cannot be excluded and unfortunately are not quantifiable. Attempts have been made where losses were demonstrated but not quantified [12]. Therefore, materials certified for matrix composition and analyte content on a mass basis do not yet exist or are not of real use for method validation by routine laboratories. They may be of interest for laboratories active in the field of fundamental research in chemical metrology where smaller quantities of material are handled. 

MS has always been seen as one of the most conclusive techniques for positive identification of organic compounds. The availability, since the beginning of the 1980s, of benchtop GC-MS systems based on quadrupole mass analyzers (GC-Q-MS) made such an analytical tool extremely popular also for routine applications. However, when GC-Q-MS is operated in the full scan mode, limits of detection (LODs) are too high, especially in trace analysis, and its use is seldom restricted to a confirmation technique.When the selected ion monitoring mode (SIM) is employed, the sensitivity is dramatically enhanced. On the other hand, SIM implies the detection of specific analytes with the consequent loss of all other information. 

---