Liquid solvent supercritical compared

Reaction schemes exploiting supercritical fluid diffusivities. The dif-fusivity of a dilute solute in a supercritical fluid, somewhat removed from the critical point, is typically an order of magnitude greater than in liquid solvents at comparable temperatures. Thus, radical initiators under supercritical fluid conditions are able to escape more readily from solvent cages, and the rate coefficient for the initiation process is markedly increased. Processes propagated by free radicals, such as polymerisation, are rate enhanced for this reason, as are enzymatic reactions. 

Initiator decomposition studies of AIBN in supercritical C02 carried out by DeSimone et al. showed that there is kinetic deviation from the traditionally studied solvent systems.16 These studies indicated a measurable decrease in the thermal decomposition of AIBN in supercritical C02 over decomposition rates measured in benzene. Kirkwood correlation plots indicate that the slower rates in supercritical C02 emanate from the overall lower dielectric constant (e) of C02 relative to that ofbenzene. Similar studies have shown an analogous trend in the decomposition kinetics ofperfluoroalkyl acyl peroxides in liquid and supercritical C02.17 Rate decreases of as much as 30% have been seen compared to decomposition measured in 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane. These studies also served to show that while initiator decomposition is in general slower in supercritical C02, overall initiation is more efficient. Uv-visual studies incorporating radical scavengers concluded that primary geminate radicals formed during thermal decomposition in supercritical C02 are not hindered to the same extent by cage effects as are those in traditional solvents such as benzene. This effect noted in AIBN decomposition in C02 is ascribed to the substantially lower viscosity of supercritical C02 compared to that ofbenzene.18... 

Thermomorphic solvent systems are at a relatively yoimg stage of development. Compared to ionic liquids or supercritical CO2 there is much less experience available. Large-scale applications are unknown at present. There are a lot of options for the future but these will depend on further research in the area. 

A third example can be taken from analytical chemistry. Absorption and resonance Raman spectra of phenol blue were measured in liquid and supercritical solvents to determine the solvent dependence of absorption bandwidth and spectral shifts. Good correlation between absorption peak shift and resonance Raman bands and between Raman bands and bandwidth of C-N stretching mode were observed while anomalous solvent effect on the absorption bandwidth occnrred in liquid solvents. Large band-widths of absorption and resonance Raman spectra were seen in supercritical solvents as compared to liquid solvents. This was dne to the small refractive indices of the supercritical solvents. The large refractive index of the liqnid solvents only make the absorption peak shifts withont broadening the absorption spectra (Yamaguchi et al., 1997). 

Decontamination of soils using supercritical fluids is an attractive process compared to extraction with liquid solvents because no toxic residue is left in the remediated soil and, in contrast to thermal desorption, the soils are not burned. In particular, typical industrial wastes such as PAHs, PCBs, and fuels can be removed easily [7 to 21]. The main applications are in preparation for analytical purposes, where supercritical fluid extraction acts as a concentration step which is much faster and cheaper than solvent-extraction. The main parameters for successful extraction are the water content of the soil, the type of soil, and the contaminating substances, the available particle-size distribution, and the content of plant material, which can act as adsorbent material and therefore prolong the extraction time. For industrial regeneration, further the amount of soil to be treated has to taken into account, because there exists, so far, no possibility of continuous input and output of solid material for high pressure extraction plants, so that the process has to be run discontinuously. 

As shown in Figure 1.2, the solvent strength of supercritical carbon dioxide approaches that of hydrocarbons or halocarbons. As a solvent, C02 is often compared to fluorinated solvents. In general, most nonpolar molecules are soluble in C02, while most polar compounds and polymers are insoluble (Hyatt, 1984). High vapor pressure fluids (e.g., acetone, methanol, ethers), many vinyl monomers (e.g., acrylates, styrenics, and olefins), free-radical initiators (e.g., azo- and peroxy-based initiators), and fluorocarbons are soluble in liquid and supercritical C02. Water and highly ionic compounds, however, are fairly insoluble in C02 (King et al., 1992 Lowry and Erickson, 1927). Only two classes of polymers, siloxane-based polymers and amorphous fluoropolymers, are soluble in C02 at relatively mild conditions (T < 100 °C and P < 350 bar) (DeSimone et al., 1992, 1994 McHugh and Krukonis, 1994). 

The wide variety of possible solvent-solute interactions requires that any scale used to quantify solvent properties will be complex. Unfortunately, no universally accepted scale of solvating power has been devised. It does not seem reasonable to develop an entirely new scale for supercritical fluid solvents, especially since it is desirable to compare the solvent behavior of supercritical fluids with that of liquid solvents. 

Solvatochromic data, specifically absorption or transition energies (E s), have been obtained for the dye phenol blue in supercritical fluids as a function of both temperature and pressure. These data will be used to compare the "solvent strength" of these fluids with liquid solvents. He will use the terms "solvent strength" and "Et" synonymously in this paper such that they include the magnitude of the polarizability/volume as well as the dipole moment. The "solvent strength" has been characterized by the spectroscopic solvatochromic parameter, E, for numerous liquid solvents (9 JU, J7,JJ3). 

The first system we consider is the solute iodine in liquid and supercritical xenon (1). In this case there is clearly no IVR, and presumably the predominant pathway involves transfer of energy from the excited iodine vibration to translations of both the solute and solvent. We introduce a breathing sphere model of the solute, and with this model calculate the required classical time-correlation function analytically (2). Information about solute-solvent structure is obtained from integral equation theories. In this case the issue of the quantum correction factor is not really important because the iodine vibrational frequency is comparable to thermal energies and so the system is nearly classical. 

Supercritical fluid extraction(SFE) combined with five types of bioassay tests is extensively applied to explore some bioactive substances from thirty types of natural resources available in Korean peninsula. To evaluate comparatively the economic viability of the SFE, organic liquid solvent extraction(LSE) with n-hexane, chloroform and methanol was also performed. To characterize the extracts, GC and HPLC are employed. Also, the column chromatography is used to isolate some target compounds from the total extracts. For all the samples, the optimum SFE condition for each sample which gives maximum yield and cytotoxicity were discussed. 

With the use of solvatochromic probes, other non-specific forces (dispersion, dipole-induced dipole, and dipole-dipole) and specific acid-base forces have been explored in SCF solvents. In an effort to compare liquid and supercritical carbon dioxide, Hyatt(ll) measured UV-visible spectra of several solvatochromic probes. There was little difference between the Ex in the liquid and SCF states however, the data can not be interpreted fully since the density and the pressure were not given at the supercritical condition. The results indicated that the... 

In addition to density, diffusivity of the supercritical fluids is higher than that of liquid solvents, and can be easily varied. For typical conditions, diffusivity in supercritical fluids is of the order of lO cm /sec as compared to 10 for gases and 10 for liquids. Typical viscosity of supercritical fluids is of the order of 10 g/cm/sec, similar to that of gases, and about 100-fold lower than that of liquids. High diffusivity and low viscosity provide rapid equilibration of the fluid to the mixture to be extracted, hence extraction can be achieved close to the thermodynamic limits. However, the main extraction benefit of supercritical fluids is their adjustable density that provides adjustable solvent strength. The compounds of choice can be dissolved/extracted in the supercritical fluid at high pressure and then this fluid mixture is carried to another vessel where simple lowering of the pressure... 

As stated in the introduction, the variable solvent power of a supercritical fluid is a nearly linear function of the density of the fluid. It is instructive to compare this way of selecting a solvent power to the more familiar operation used with ordinary liquid solvents. Figure 2 is a schematic of solute solubility as a function of solvent power where the solvent power ranges from that of non-polar hexane to polar water a multitude of solvents lies in between, only a few of which are shown. Consider a hypo-... 

They were the calculation of the Hildebrand solubility parameter as a function of density using tabulated thermodynamic data for carbon dioxide and Raman spectroscopy of test solutes dissolved in supercritical carbon dioxide compared to liquid solvents to evaluate solvent-solute interactions. The results of these recent approaches indicated that while the maximum solvent power of carbon dioxide is similar to that of hexane, probably somewhat higher, there is some solvent-solute interaction not found with hexane as the solvent. The limiting solvent power of carbon dioxide is resolved by choosing the alternative of a supercritical fluid mixture as the mobile phase. The component added to the supercritical fluid to increase its solvent power and/or to alter the chromatograph column is referred to as the "modifier."... 

In the Croteau and Fogerson study, the triperpenic alcohols and sterols were derivatized into their trimethylsilyl ether derivatives using bis-trimethylsilylacetamide. The isopropanol-chloroform extract contained higher amounts of sterols and triteipenic alcohols such as p-sitosterol and amyrin compared to the SF extract. This could be due to the high polarity of the extracting liquid solvent as opposed to the supercritical fluid, and the increased volatility of the silylated sterols and triteipenic compounds relative to our fatty acid methyl esters, in addition to these compounds, the isopropanol-chloroform extract reported earlier also contained ursolic acid, a polar triteipenic acid, which was not extracted with pure CO2. 

AR occur in cashew nut shells as a fraction of other oil components like cardols, cardanols and anacardic acid. A comparative study on the extraction of cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) was presented by Shobha and Ravindranath (50). The study involved the extraction of the cashew nut shell by supercritical CO2 or pentane. The pentane extraction was carried out on 50g steamed or fresh cashew nut shells in lOOmL solvent. Supercritical CO2 extraction was performed on 300g freshly broken cashew nut shells at 25 MPa and 40 C with the CO2 flow kept at 4-5Kg/h for 17,5h with extract collection every 2.5h. The resorcinolic lipid fraction obtained by supercritical CO2 represented 82% of the equivalent obtained by pentane extraction of fresh cashew nut shells and 70% of the extraction of steamed material. Despite this appreciable variation on the ratio of the total cardols and cardanols from one mediod to other, the relative proportion of the enomers in each group was very similar (50). Generally, the extraction yield obtained by supercritical CO2 was lower (= 60%) than that obtained by the classical solvent extraction methods (50), however, the product was nearly colorless. One of the major problems in the industrial application of CNSL is the very dark brown color of the solvent extracted product. 

One of the problems with using a liquid as the extraction solvent is its removal when the extraction is finished. The most recent way to eliminate this problem is to use a supercritical gas, COj being the gas of choice at the moment. A gas in the supercritical state has solvent properties comparable to a liquid but it is less viscous, so it can penetrate the sample faster. When the extraction is complete, the pressure is released, and the gas evaporates away from the extracted components. CO2 is nonpolar so more polar compounds such as methanol are sometimes added in small amounts. This exceWeni supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) technique is described in Chapter 13. 

An alternative to liquid-solid extraction is supercritical fluid extraction (SEE) which allows the extraction of analytes from solid samples, i.e., marine sediments, to be performed faster and more efficiently since these have a lower viscosity and higher diffusivity than liquid solvents." CO2 is the most widely used supercritical fluid with or without a modifier, e.g., methanol and toluene. SFE can be combined with solid-phase trapping.Compared with Soxhlet extraction, SFE gave similar yields, but the extracts were much cleaner and it was not necessary to clean the extracts before GC analysis."" ... 

Kamat et al. dlso support this hypothesis [18]. They compared lipase-catalyzed transesterification rates in supercritical carbon dioxide, fluoroform, ethylene, ethane, propane, and sulfur hexafluoride as well as in several conventional liquid solvents of different polarities. The reaction rates increased with increasing hydrophobicity of solvent within the SCFs and also within the liquid solvent group. Because the solvent s immiscibility with water and its apolarity, by themselves, are irrelevant to enzymatic activity [8], it appears that the activity loss is the result of the enzyme losing essential water. Although SCCO2 is generally considered to be a hydrophobic solvent, it is more hydrophilic than fluoroform or hexane and capable of stripping essential water from the enzyme in an essentially nonaqueous environment. 

Nanocrystalline metal (silver and copper) and metal sulfide (silver sulfide, cadmium sulfide, and lead sulfide) particles were prepared via RESOLV (Rapid Expansion of a Supercritical Solution into a Liquid SOLVent) with water-in-carbon dioxide microemulsion as solvent for the rapid expansion. The nanoparticles were characterized using UV/vis absorption. X-ray powder diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy methods. The results of the different nanoparticles are compared and discussed in reference to those of the same nanoparticles produced via RESOLV with the use of conventional supercritical solvents. 

---