Liquid chromatography/mass background

More recently, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) have been evaluated as possible alternative methods for carfentrazone-ethyl compounds in crop matrices. The LC/MS methods allow the chemical derivatization step for the acid metabolites to be avoided, reducing the analysis time. These new methods provide excellent sensitivity and method recovery for carfentrazone-ethyl. However, the final sample extracts, after being cleaned up extensively using three SPE cartridges, still exhibited ionization suppression due to the matrix background for the acid metabolites. Acceptable method recoveries (70-120%) of carfentrazone-ethyl metabolites have not yet been obtained. 

Guo X, Bruins AP, Covey TR (2006) Characterization of typical chemical background interferences in atmospheric pressure ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20 3145-3150... 

Windig, W. Phalp, J.M. Payne, A.W. A Noise and Background Reduction Method for Component Detection in Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, Anal. Chem. 68(20), 3602-3606 (1996). 

In modern times, most analyses are performed on an analytical instrument for, e.g., gas chromatography (GC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ultra-violet/visible (UV) or infrared (IR) spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), mass spectrometry. Each of these instruments has a limitation on the amount of an analyte that they can detect. This limitation can be expressed as the IDL, which may be defined as the smallest amount of an analyte that can be reliably detected or differentiated from the background on an instrument. 

This paper is the only one in the liquid chromatography portion of this symposium which will attempt to deal with chromatography specifically from the viewpoint of the pesticide metabolism chemist. A residue analyst knows what compound he must analyze for, and develops his method with the properties of that substance in mind. On the other hand, the pesticide metabolism chemist has a different problem. At the conclusion of the treatment, exposure, and harvest phases of a radiolabeled metabolism study, he divides his material into appropriate samples, and extracts each sample with selected solvents to obtain the radioactive materials in soluble form. Typically these extracts consist of low levels (ppm) of carbon-14 labeled metabolites in a complicated mixture of normal natural products from the plant, animal, or soil source. The identity of each metabolite is unknown, and each must be isolated from the natural background and from other labeled metabolites in sufficient quantity and in adequate purity for identification studies, usually by mass spectrometry. The situation is rather like looking for the proverbial "needle in the haystack" when one does not know the size, shape,or composition of the needle, or even how many needles there are in the stack. At this point a separation technique must be selected with certain important requirements in mind. 

---