Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Linear response theory procedure

We observe at this point that Eq. (S.S9) supplemented by Eq. (S.S8) expresses the most recent analytical result obtained to account for the effects of nonlinear excitation. Note, however, that the perturbation approach behind this equation means that it is unable to account for large deviations from linear response theory. In other words, both the intrinsically nonlinear statistics of the system under study and the intensity of the external excitation have to be assumed to be quite small. The rotational coimterpart of Eq. (S.S8) (< is replaced by the angular velocity comparison with the results obtained by applying the continued fraction procedure (CPF) (see Chapters III and IV). It has been shown that the deviation of the linear response theory from the CFP is intermediate between that predicted by Eq. (5.59) and that based on Suzuki s mean held approximation (Chapter V). (In agreement with the CFP, however, both predict that the decay of becomes slower with increases in the excitation parameter r = ( )exc/ " )eq -1.)... [Pg.258]

Helgaker et alP presented a fully analytical implementation of spin-spin coupling constants at the DFT level. They used the standard procedure for linear response theory to evaluate second-order properties of PSO, FC and SD mechanisms. Their calculation involves all four contributions of the nonrelativistic Ramsey theory. They tested three different XC functionals -LDA (local density approximation), BLYP (Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr), " and B3LYP (hybrid BLYP). All three levels of theory represent a... [Pg.130]

According to linear response theory, the procedure described is valid independent of the particular type of perturbation, e.g., sinusoidal, multi-sinus, step function, Dirac pulse, white noise, etc., provided the system meets the following conditions (Kramers, 1929 de Kronig, 1926 Van Meirhaeghe et al., 1976 Macdonald and Urquidi-Mac-donald, 1985 Urquidi-Macdonald et al., 1986). [Pg.297]

The calculation of the thermal conductivity of gas hydrate using EMD and the Green-Kubo linear response theory was repeated recently. In that work, convergences of the relevant quantities were monitored carefully as a function of the model size. Subtleties in the numerical procedures were also carefully considered. The thermal conductivity of methane hydrate was found to converge within numerical accuracy for 3 x 3 x 3 and 4x4x4 supercells. In the calculation of the heat flux vector there is an interactive term that is a pairwise summation over the forces exerted by atomic sites on one another. The species (i.e., water and methane) enthalpy correction term requires that the total enthalpy of the system is decomposed into contributions from each species. Because of the partial transformation from pairwise, real-space treatment to a reciprocal space form in Ewald electrostatics, it is necessary to recast the diffusive and interactive terms in this expression in a form amenable for use with the Ewald method using the formulation of Petravic. ... [Pg.341]

The second procedure, several aspects of which are reviewed in this paper, consists of directly computing the asymptotic value by employing newly-developed polymeric techniques which take advantage of the one-dimensional periodicity of these systems. Since the polarizability is either the linear response of the dipole moment to the field or the negative of the second-order term in the perturbation expansion of the energy as a power series in the field, several schemes can be proposed for its evaluation. Section 3 points out that several of these schemes are inconsistent with band theory summarized in Section 2. In Section 4, we present the main points of the polymeric polarization propagator approaches we have developed, and in Section 5, we describe some of their characteristics in applications to prototype systems. [Pg.97]

The extraction of a homogeneous process from a stationary Markov process is a familiar procedure in the theory of linear response. As an example take a sample of a paramagnetic material placed in a constant external magnetic field B. The magnetization Y in the direction of the field is a stationary stochastic process with a macroscopic average value and small fluctuations around it. For the moment we assume that it is a Markov process. The function Px (y) is given by the canonical distribution... [Pg.88]

Also in response theory the summation over excited states is effectively replaced by solving a system of linear equations. Spin-orbit matrix elements are obtained from linear response functions, whereas quadratic response functions can most elegantly be utilized to compute spin-forbidden radiative transition probabilities. We refrain from going into details here, because an excellent review on this subject has been published by Agren et al.118 While these authors focus on response theory and its application in the framework of Cl and multiconfiguration self-consistent field (MCSCF) procedures, an analogous scheme using coupled-cluster electronic structure methods was presented lately by Christiansen et al.124... [Pg.166]

In the following it will be outlined, how the parity violating potentials are computed within a sum-over-states approach, namely on the uncoupled Hartree-Fock (UCHF) level, and within the configuration interaction singles approach (CIS) which is equivalent to the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA), that avoids, however, the sum over intermediate states. Then a further extension is discussed, namely the random phase approximation (RPA) and an implementation along similar lines within a density functional theory (DFT) ansatz, and finally a multi-configuration linear response approach is described, which represents a systematic procedure that... [Pg.233]

The linear response methods offer a viable alternative to the Cl procedure [38]. A time-dependent (TD) perturbation theory (e.g. involving an oscillating electric field), combined with the SCF or MCSCF method is referred to as the TD-SCF (or random phase approximation, RPA) or the TD-MCSCF (or multiconfigurational linear response, MCLR), respectively. Let us consider the time development of the dipole moment (z-component for simplicity) ... [Pg.34]

For the solution of measuring problems in optics and other fields of physics, there is a simple mathematical procedure (i.e., the theory of linear response) that makes use of the overall behavior of the apparatus in defined processes in order to calculate unknown complex processes from the measured function. Here we shall derive this relationship in order to define the conditions under which this desmearing procedure can be applied. We shall formulate the laws in a general manner using the variable x as in mathematics. Consider an abrupt (pulse-like) event taking place in the apparatus at x. Using the Dirac delta function d x),... [Pg.115]

The procedure shown in Fig. 7-1 describes the perturbation of a system by a signal X (0 superimposed to the steady state, which causes the system to respond by a signal of the conjugated variable y(t) (Jiittner et al., 1985). Regardless of the shape of the X (t) perturbation, linear system theory predicts that the dynamic behavior of the system is fully determined by its transient response y(t) in the time domain or by its transfer function H(s) in the frequency domain. In the time domain, the correlation between system perturbation x (t) and response y(t) is given by the convolution of both functions, jc (t)=y (t)xh (r), defined by the integral... [Pg.297]

Most generally, this problem has no analytical solution and must be solved numerieally unless the linearized form of these equations is used. A linearization procedure is allowed by using a small-amplitude perturbation NE i) so as to neglect die nonlinear terms (degree higher than one) in the Taylor expansion of S, S and /j around the mean steady state ofthe system. It is known from linear system theory that under these eonditions the response A/(t) is proportional to the perturbation NE t). The dynamie behavior of the electrode at this partieular polarization point is completely described by its eomplex impedanee Z (/ ) = A (/(b) / A/(/(b) in the frequency domain where A (/(b) and /(Jo) are the Fourier transforms of A (t) and A/(t). [Pg.104]

The regression coefficients of descriptors denote the system (combination of mobile and stationary phases) response to these interactions. These coefficients can be measured, however the procedure is time consuming and inappropriate for practical purposes. According to the linear solvent strength theory (LSST) the retention of the analyte depends on the volume fraction (cp) of the organic modifier in binary mobile phase systems ... [Pg.26]

A mixed quantum classical description of EET does not represent a unique approach. On the one hand side, as already indicated, one may solve the time-dependent Schrodinger equation responsible for the electronic states of the system and couple it to the classical nuclear dynamics. Alternatively, one may also start from the full quantum theory and derive rate equations where, in a second step, the transfer rates are transformed in a mixed description (this is the standard procedure when considering linear or nonlinear optical response functions). Such alternative ways have been already studied in discussing the linear absorbance of a CC in [9] and the computation of the Forster-rate in [10]. [Pg.40]

Reis et al. report theoretical studies of the urea250 and benzene251 crystals. Their calculations start from MP2 ab initio data for the frequency-dependent molecular response functions and include crystal internal field effects via a rigorous local-field theory. The permanent dipolar fields of the interacting molecules are also taken into account using an SCF procedure. The experimental linear susceptibility of urea is accurately reproduced while differences between theory and experiment remain for /2). Hydrogen bonding effects, which prove to be small, have been estimated from a calculation of the response functions of a linear dimer of urea. Various optoelectronic response functions have been calculated. For benzene the experimental first order susceptibility is accurately reproduced and results for third order effects are predicted. Overall results and their comparison with studies of liquid benzene show that for compact nonpolar molecules environmental effects on the susceptibilities are small. [Pg.29]

The minor disturbance or perturbation method relies on equilibrium theory too and was suggested, for example, by Reilley, Hildebrand, and Ashley (1962). As known from linear chromatography and exploited above already frequently, the retention time of the response to a small pulse injected into a column filled with pure eluent can be used to obtain the initial slope of the isotherm. This approach can be expanded to cover the whole isotherm range. For the example of a singlecomponent system the procedure is as follows (Figure 6.25) the column is equilibrated with a concentration and, once the plateau is established, a small pulse is injected at a time tstarta and a pulse of a different concentration is detected at the corresponding retention time (r a. [Pg.392]

In previous chapters, Laplace transform techniques were used to calculate transient responses from transfer functions. This chapter focuses on an alternative way to analyze dynamic systems by using frequency response analysis. Frequency response concepts and techniques play an important role in stability analysis, control system design, and robustness analysis. Historically, frequency response techniques provided the conceptual framework for early control theory and important applications in the field of communications (MacFarlane, 1979). We introduce a simplified procedure to calculate the frequency response characteristics from the transfer function of any linear process. Two concepts, the Bode and Nyquist stability criteria, are generally applicable for feedback control systems and stability analysis. Next we introduce two useful metrics for relative stability, namely gain and phase margins. These metrics indicate how close to instability a control system is. A related issue is robustness, which addresses the sensitivity of... [Pg.251]


See other pages where Linear response theory procedure is mentioned: [Pg.321]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.9144]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.1293]    [Pg.3003]    [Pg.315]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.258 ]




SEARCH



Linear response

Linear response theory

Linear theory

Linearized theory

Response theories

© 2024 chempedia.info