Conjugated variables

A further preliminary statement to this section would be that, somewhat analogously to classical physics or mechanics where positions and momenta (or velocities) are the two conjugate variables that determine the motion, moduli and phases play similar roles. But the analogy is not perfect. Indeed, early on it was questioned, apparently first by Pauli [104], whether a wave function can be constructed from the knowledge of a set of moduli alone. It was then argued by Lamb [105] that from a set of values of wave function moduli and of their rates... 

The energy q of a nuclear or electronic excited state of mean lifetime t cannot be determined exactly because of the limited time interval At available for the measurement. Instead, q can only be established with an inherent uncertainty, AE, which is given by the Heisenberg uncertainty relation in the form of the conjugate variables energy and time,... 

In this equation, we have made the replacement k = (1/2 ir)yg8 in order to introduce the Fourier conjugate variable to r. This is because formally Eq. (1.6) is a Fourier transformation. What we really want to know is the shape of the sample, p(r), which we can derive by applying the inverse Fourier transformation to the signal function ... 

The use of the electron density and the number of electrons as a set of independent variables, in contrast to the canonical set, namely, the external potential and the number of electrons, is based on a series of papers by Nalewajski [21,22]. A.C. realized that this choice is problematic because one cannot change the number of electrons while the electron density remains constant. After several attempts, he found that the energy per particle possesses the convexity properties that are required by the Legendre transformations. When the Legendre transform was performed on the energy per particle, the shape function immediately appeared as the conjugate variable to the external potential, so that the electron density was split into two pieces that can be varied independent the number of electrons and their distribution in space. 

Our starting point is a generic constmction for the extraction of work from a flow of heat (cf. Fig. 4). The auxiliary system—for example, a Brownian motor— performs work, W = Fx, against an external force F, where x is the corresponding variation of the thermodynamically conjugated variable. The system is at a temperature T and we introduce the corresponding thermodynamic force, Xi =F/T, and flux J = x (the dot referring to the time derivative). 

Equation A2.10 represents a necessary and sufficient condition for equation A2.2 to be an exact differential and is valid for any couple of conjugate variables... 

The Heisenberg-Bohr uncertainty relations given by (87) relate to the ideal case of Gaussian distributions with minimum uncertainty in the conjugated variables. In most cases and the equality turns into the habitual inequalities... 

It is, perhaps, less known that the concepts of complementarity and indeterminacy also arise naturally in the theory of Brownian motion. In fact, position and apparent velocity of a Brownian particle are complementary in the sense of Bohr they are subject to an indeterminacy relation formally similar to that of quantum mechanics, but physically of a different origin. Position and apparent velocity are not conjugate variables in the sense of mechanics. The indeterminacy is due to the statistical character of the apparent velocity, which, incidentally, obeys a non-linear (Burgers ) equation. This is discussed in part I. 

Given a set Rd of transformed intensive variables, we should naturally seek expressions for the corresponding conjugate variables R . which must satisfy... 

Note also that (11.67) determines the coefficients in (11.68) only up to a multiplicative factor, which has been chosen so that V (rather than a multiple thereof) becomes the remaining conjugate variable in (11.70). 

Let us now examine the deeper geometrical significance of (12.26). For this purpose, it is convenient to select A, B as self-conjugate variables (corresponding to orthonormal thermodynamic vectors), such as the metric eigenmodes Ex, E2 ... 

Let the prefix 5 denote the variation erf a state variable from a reference equilibrium state. Expanding the conjugate variables SD, 5 T and A(=dA) with respect to the independent variables 8E, 8S and one can obtain within a linear approximation,... 

Laplace transforms, introducing the conjugate variables rm, rn = 1,..., M (In field theory a variable of the type rfn would be addressed as a mass1.) After the Laplace transform a propagator of momentum k in the m-th polymer line yields a factor G7jF(k rm). All segment integrations are eliminated. 

We represent the phase-volume element dV in the form dT = dhdl dtp0, where h and canonically conjugated variables, (p0 is an initial instant that enters in addition to time (p in the law of motion of a dipole. Another pair of canonical variables is /, 0 we omit differential df>() in dT, since the variables we use do not depend on the azimuthal coordinate < )0. 

This shows that the natural variables of G for a one-phase nonreaction system are T, P, and n . The number of natural variables is not changed by a Legendre transform because conjugate variables are interchanged as natural variables. In contrast with the natural variables for U, the natural variables for G are two intensive properties and Ns extensive properties. These are generally much more convenient natural variables than S, V, and k j. Thus thermodynamic potentials can be defined to have the desired set of natural variables. 

Now we are in a position to generalize on the number of different thermodynamic potentials there are for a system. The number of ways to subtract products of conjugate variables, zero-at-a-time, one-at-a-time, and two-at-a-time, is 2k, where k is the number of conjugate pairs involved. In probability theory the number 2k of ways is referred to as the number of sets of k elements. For a one-phase system involving PV work but no chemical reactions, the number of natural variables is D and the number of different thermodynamic potentials is 2D. If D = 2 (as in dU = TdS — PdV), the number of different thermodynamic potentials is 22 = 4, as we have seen with U, H, A, and G. If D = 3 (as in d(7=TdS — PdL+ n da), the number of different thermodynamic potentials is 23 = 8. 

Equation 8.5-3 indicates that the number of natural variables for the system is 6, D = 6. Thus the number D of natural variables is the same for G and G, as expected, since the Legendre transform interchanges conjugate variables. The criterion for equilibrium is dG 0 at constant T,P,ncAoi, ncA(3, /icC, and The Gibbs-Duhem equations are the same as equations 8.4-8 and 8.4-9, and so the number of independent intensive variables is not changed. Equation 8.5-3 yields the same membrane equations (8.4-13 and 8.4-14) derived in the preceding section. 

In conclusion, entropy is the physical quantity that represents the capacity of distribution of energy over the energy levels of the individual constituent particles in the system. The extensive variable entropy S and the intensive variable the absolute temperature Tare conjugated variables, whose product TdS represents the heat reversibly transferred into or out of the system. In other words, the reversible transfer of heat into or out of the system is always accompanied by the transfer of entropy. 

In physics the concept is known as the property of all pairs of conjugate variables, such as position and momentum, mathematically related by Fourier transformation. The de Broglie formula that relates the momentum of matter waves to wavelength... 

---