Pharmacokinetic profile, linear

Studies of the pharmacokinetics of this deHvery system in two animal models have been reported in the Hterature. After iajection of these microspheres at three doses, leuproHde concentrations were sustained for over four weeks foUowing an initial burst (116). The results iadicated that linear pharmacokinetic profiles in absorption, distribution, metaboHsm, and excretion were achieved at doses of 3 to 15 mg/kg using the dmg loaded microspheres in once-a-month repeated injections. 

The bio availability of gabapentin is approximately 60%, 47%, 34%, 33%, and 27% following 900, 1200, 2400, 3600, and 4800 mg/day given in three divided doses, respectively. The bioavailability is not dose-proportional (as the dose is increased, bioavailability decreases). In contrast, pregabalin offers a more linear pharmacokinetic profile over gabapentin and a consistent >90% bioavailability. Pregabalin may result in a shorter course of titration and quicker response in clinical application. 

Also, if conversion of drug to active metabolite shows significant departure from linear pharmacokinetics, it is possible that small differences in the rate of absorption of the parent drug (even within the 80-125% range for log transformed data) could result in clinically significant differences in the concentration/ time profiles for the active metabolite. When reliable data indicate that this situation may exist, a requirement of quantification of active metabolites in a bioequivalency study would seem to be fully justified. 

A purely hydrophilic matrix of hypromellose prolongs the release of tramadol from Tramal long (Fig. 3) developed by Gruenenthal. The tablets have the same dimensions, resulting in an identical release profile for all dosages (100, 150, 200 mg, see Fig. 4). For a titrated effect linear pharmacokinetics on increasing doses produce dose-proportional blood levels at any time. External influences, such as pH value, mechanical stress, surface-active... 

A two-compartment open linear model has been described for the pharmacokinetic profile of cocaine after intravenous administration.14 The distribution phase after cocaine administration is rapid and the elimination half-life estimated as 31 to 82 min.14 Cone9 fitted data to a two-compartment model with bolus input and first-order elimination for the intravenous and smoked routes. For the intranasal route, data were fitted to a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. The average elimination half-life (tx 2 3) was 244 min after intravenous administration, 272 min after smoked administration, and 299 min after intranasal administration. 

In pharmaceutical research and drug development, noncompartmental analysis is normally the first and standard approach used to analyze pharmacokinetic data. The aim is to characterize the disposition of the drug in each individual, based on available concentration-time data. The assessment of pharmacokinetic parameters relies on a minimum set of assumptions, namely that drug elimination occurs exclusively from the sampling compartment, and that the drug follows linear pharmacokinetics that is, drug disposition is characterized by first-order processes (see Chapter 7). Calculations of pharmacokinetic parameters with this approach are usually based on statistical moments, namely the area under the concentration-time profile (area under the zero moment curve, AUC) and the area under the first moment curve (AUMC), as well as the terminal elimination rate constant (Xz) for extrapolation of AUC and AUMC beyond the measured data. Other pharmacokinetic parameters such as half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL), and volume of distribution (V) can then be derived. 

Pharmacokinetic profile data for GSA non-linear regression demonstration... 

Linear pharmacokinetics within the investigated rate of delivery (dose/time units) of the drug to the body, i.e., the plasma concentration-time profile, should be identical for different doses after correction for dose. The most common reason for nonlinear pharmacokinetics is dose-dependent first-pass metabolism. This phenomenon does not just occur at high doses, but has also been shown for the slow delivery rates obtained by ER formulations. 

Within this context, the range of dose levels of a chemical causing a transition from a linear to a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile comprise the pharmacokinetic threshold dose range for the chemical. The change in the relationship between the internal concentration of the toxic entity and the dose level must be taken into account when extrapolating the observed response at dose levels above the pharmacokinetic threshold to the expected response at much lower dose levels. 

Furthermore, administration of different doses of these drugs may not result in parallel plasma concentration versus time profiles expected for drugs with linear pharmacokinetics (Fig. 15.3). 

In humans, the difference is small between ivacaftor (l) s human pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles for healthy adult volunteers and patients with cystic fibrosis. The drug displays a linear pharmacokinetics with regard to both time and dosage... 

Various pharmacokinetic parameters such as CL, Vd, F%, MRT, and im can be determined using noncompartmental methods. These methods are based on the empirical determination of AUC and AUMC described above. Unlike compartmental models (see below), these calculation methods can be applied to any other models, provided that the drug follows linear pharmacokinetics. However, a limitation of the noncompartmental method is that it cannot be used for the simulation n of different plasma concentration-time profiles when there are alterations in dosing regimen or when multiple dosing regimens are used. 

The Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products [8] applied the BCS, with certain requirements, to dispense with bioequivalency tests if the active pharmaceutical ingredient is class I and the in vitro dissolution of the finished dosage form is fast [9], An active substance is considered highly soluble if the amount contained in the HDS of an IR product is dissolved in 250 ml of each of three buffers within the range of pH 1-8 at 37°C (e.g., pH 1.0, 4.6, and 6.8). There should be linear and complete absorption, which indicates HP to reduce the possibility of an IR dosage form influencing the bioavailability [8], The similarity of the dissolution profiles of the test and reference products is demonstrated in each of three buffers within the range of pH 1-8 at 37°C (e.g., pH 1.0,4.6, and 6.8). If there is rapid dissolution of the product, where at least 85% of the active substance is dissolved within 15 min, no further comparison of the test and reference is required. Further requirements include that excipients be well established and have no interaction with the pharmacokinetics of the active substance and that the method of manufacture of finished product... 

Conceptual models of percutaneous absorption which are rigidly adherent to general solutions of Pick s equation are not always applicable to in vivo conditions, primarily because such models may not always be physiologically relevant. Linear kinetic models describing percutaneous absorption in terms of mathematical compartments that have approximate physical or anatomical correlates have been proposed. In these models, the various relevant events, including cutaneous metabolism, considered to be important in the overall process of skin absorption are characterized by first-order rate constants. The rate constants associated with diffusional events in the skin are assumed to be proportional to mass transfer parameters. Constants associated with the systemic distribution and elimination processes are estimated from pharmacokinetic parameters derived from plasma concentration-time profiles obtained following intravenous administration of the penetrant. 

---