Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ligands block copolymers

The polymerization of 2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate, DEAEMA, was studied under different conditions. It was shown that the best system providing narrow molecular weight distribution polymers involved the use of p-toluenesulfonyl chloride/CuCl/HMTETA as the initiator/catalyst/ligand at 60 °C in methanol [72]. Taking advantage of these results, well-defined PDEAEMA-fr-PfBuMA block copolymers were obtained. The synthesis was successful when either fBuMA or DEAEMA was polymerized first. Poor results with bimodal distributions were obtained when CuBr was used as the catalyst. This behavior was attributed to the poor blocking efficiency of PDEAEMA-Br and the incomplete functionalization of the macroinitiator. [Pg.44]

A general strategy developed for the synthesis of supramolecular block copolymers involves the preparation of macromolecular chains end-capped with a 2,2 6/,2//-terpyridine ligand which can be selectively complexed with RUCI3. Under these conditions only the mono-complex between the ter-pyridine group and Ru(III) is formed. Subsequent reaction with another 2,2 6/,2"-terpyridine terminated polymer under reductive conditions for the transformation of Ru(III) to Ru(II) leads to the formation of supramolecular block copolymers. Using this methodology the copolymer with PEO and PS blocks was prepared (Scheme 42) [ 107]. [Pg.58]

PPO-b-PDEAEMA block copolymers were prepared using a PPO macroinitiator, synthesized as previously described. The copolymerization was performed in methanol at 55 °C using CuCl as the catalyst and HMTETA as the ligand [127]. The yield was quantitative and the molecular weight distribution equal to 1.20. [Pg.70]

ARGET ATRP has been successfully applied for polymerization of methyl methacrylate, ft-butyl acrylate and styrene in the presence of Sn(EH)2 (10 mol% vs. alkyl halide initiator or 0.07 mol% vs. monomer) [164,165]. For all monomers, polymerizations were well controlled using between 10 and 50 ppm of copper complexes with highly active TPMA and Me6TREN ligands. ARGET ATRP has also been utilized in the synthesis of block copolymers (poly(n-butyl acrylate)— -polystyrene and polystyrene-Z -poly(n-butyl acrylate) [164,165] and grafting... [Pg.245]

Another possible strategy towards colloids stabilized by micellar systems is the use of nonamphiphibc block copolymers containing metal binding ligands in only one of the blocks. For example, a poly(styrene)-fc ock-poly(m-vinyltriphenylphosphine) (PS-b-PPH) was examined with respect to its colloid formation properties (Fig. 6.5) [46]. [Pg.285]

A second approach that should allow for catalyst recycling is based on amphiphilic block copolymers, where the catalyst is covalently bound to the hydrophobic block. The groups of G. Oehme in Rostock and O. Nuyken in Munich are working on such systems that are sometimes described as metallosurfactants. The appending polymers without the catalyst are called macroligands or amphiphihzed ligands [4, 50]. [Pg.286]

Much research has already been devoted in the past couple of years to (i) the immobilization of ATRP active metal catalysts on various supports to allow for catalyst separation and reycycling and (ii) ATRP experiments in pure water as the solvent of choice [62]. A strategy to combine these two demands with an amphiphilic block polymer has recently been presented. Two types of polymeric macroligands where the ligand was covalently linked to the amphiphilic poly(2-oxazo-line)s were prepared. In the case of ruthenium, the triphenylphosphine-functiona-lized poly(2-oxazoline)s described in section 6.2.3.2 were used, whereas in the case of copper as metal, 2,2 -bipyridine functionalized block copolymers were prepared via living cationic polymerization [63] of 2-methyl-2-oxazoline and a bipyridine-functionalized monomer as shown in Scheme 6.8. [Pg.292]

Both methods require that the polymerization of the first monomer not be carried to completion, usually 90% conversion is the maximum conversion, because the extent of normal bimolecular termination increases as the monomer concentration decreases. This would result in loss of polymer chains with halogen end groups and a corresponding loss of the ability to propagate when the second monomer is added. The final product would he a block copolymer contaminated with homopolymer A. Similarly, the isolated macroinitiator method requires isolation of RA X prior to complete conversion so that there is a minimum loss of functional groups for initiation. Loss of functionality is also minimized by adjusting the choice and amount of the components of the reaction system (activator, deactivator, ligand, solvent) and other reaction conditions (concentration, temperature) to minimize normal termination. [Pg.322]

To understand whether the preorganization in a block copolymer assembly indeed provides any advantages in presenting multivalent hgand copies, one could envision the presentation of a single copy of a specific ligand at the hydrophilic chain terminus... [Pg.21]

This finding is a significant improvement over aqueous ROMP systems using aqueous ROMP catalysts. The propagating species in these reactions is stable. The synthesis of water-soluble block copolymers can be achieved via sequential monomer addition. The polymerization is not of living type in the absence of acid. In addition to eliminating hydroxide ions, which would cause catalyst decomposition, the catalyst activity is also enhanced by the protonation of the phosphine ligands. Remarkably, the acids do not react with the ruthenium alkylidene bond. [Pg.13]


See other pages where Ligands block copolymers is mentioned: [Pg.316]    [Pg.946]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.1555]    [Pg.1588]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.846 , Pg.847 ]




SEARCH



Ligand Ligands, blocking

© 2024 chempedia.info