Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Li-graphite electrodes

In the following four examples, we demonstrate how the behavior of Li-graphite electrodes can be attenuated by relatively small changes in the solution composition, which modify their surface chemistry. [Pg.121]

Graphite electrodes do not behave reversibly in ester solutions, such as methyl formate or BL. By addition of CO2 to these systems, Li-graphite electrodes behave reversibly and are very stable in these solutions because their surface films become dominated by Li2C03. ... [Pg.121]

Li graphite electrodes depends on a rapid precipitation of cohesive and adhesive surface films, the particles morphology plays an important role. The smoother the edge planes of the graphite particles, through which Li is inserted, so the precipitation of passivating surface films by solution reactions may be faster and more efficient. [Pg.124]

Whereas the electrochemical decomposition of propylene carbonate (PC) on graphite electrodes at potentials between 1 and 0.8 V vs. Li/Li was already reported in 1970 [140], it took about four years to find out that this reaction is accompanied by a partially reversible electrochemical intercalation of solvated lithium ions, Li (solv)y, into the graphite host [64], In general, the intercalation of Li (and other alkali-metal) ions from electrolytes with organic donor solvents into fairly crystalline graphitic carbons quite often yields solvated (ternary) lithiated graphites, Li r(solv)yC 1 (Fig. 8) [7,24,26,65,66,141-146],... [Pg.394]

Lithium carbonate and hydrocarbon were identified in XPS spectra of graphite electrodes after the first cycle in LiPF6/EC-DMC electrolyte [104]. Electrochemical QCMB experiments in LiAsF6/EC-DEC solution [99] clearly indicated the formation of a surface film at about 1.5 V vs. (Li/Li+). However the values of mass accumulation per mole of electrons transferred (m.p.e), calculated for the surface species, were smaller than those of the expected surface compounds (mainly (CF OCC Li ). This was attributed to the low stability of the SEI and its partial dissolution. [Pg.441]

There is no question that the development and commercialization of lithium ion batteries in recent years is one of the most important successes of modem electrochemistiy. Recent commercial systems for power sources show high energy density, improved rate capabilities and extended cycle life. The major components in most of the commercial Li-ion batteries are graphite electrodes, LiCo02 cathodes and electrolyte solutions based on mixtures of alkyl carbonate solvents, and LiPF6 as the salt.1 The electrodes for these batteries always have a composite structure that includes a metallic current collector (usually copper or aluminum foil/grid for the anode and cathode, respectively), the active mass comprises micrometric size particles and a polymeric binder. [Pg.216]

Figure 1 provides several electrochemical windows of important, relevant processes, including the reduction of alkyl carbonates, ethers, Li insertion into graphite, and Li metal deposition. Recent studies revealed two major failure mechanisms of graphite electrodes in repeated Li insertion/ deinsertion processes 21... [Pg.217]

When the electrolyte solutions are not too reactive, as in the case of ethereal solutions, there is no massive formation of protective surface films at potentials above Li intercalation potential, and most of the solvent reduction processes may occur at potentials lower than 0.3 V vs. Li/Li+. Hence, the passivation of the electrodes is not sufficient to prevent cointercalation of solvent molecules. This leads to an exfoliation of the graphite particles into amorphous dust (expholiated graphene planes). This scenario is demonstrated in Figure 2a as the reduction of the 002 diffraction peak21 of the graphite electrode, polarized cathodically in an ethereal solution. [Pg.217]

In the case of solutions based on a solvent such as propylene carbonate (PC), the failure of graphite electrodes is attributed by some researches to the exfoliation of the graphite particles due to cointercalation of PC molecules with the Li ions.14,22 The difference between ethylene carbonate (EC) and PC in this respect may, according to this approach, be attributed to the higher ability of PC molecules to solvate Li ions.23 Hence, cointercalation of PC molecules takes place because their desolvation from Li ions, which migrate from solution phase to the intercalation sites in the graphite,... [Pg.217]

Both carbon materials were tested for their initial electrochemical performance in the 2-electrode electrochemical cells with Li metal as a counter electrode. Our findings have shown that with both types of carbon materials, achieving near theoretical reversible capacity upon Li+ deintercalation was possible. Thus, in a typical half cell environment (a CR2016 type coin cell with graphite and Li metal electrodes, a 1M LiPF6,... [Pg.335]

Q. Deng, B. Li, and S. Dong, Self-gelatinizable copolymer immobilized glucose biosensor based on Prussian Blue modified graphite electrode. Analyst 123, 1995-1999 (1998). [Pg.462]


See other pages where Li-graphite electrodes is mentioned: [Pg.227]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.90]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.209 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.209 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.209 ]




SEARCH



Graphite electrode

Graphitic Electrodes

Li electrodes

© 2024 chempedia.info