Laws of interaction

Returning to the energy of interaction between two molecules as a function of distance, we see that the energy at large distances decreases as 1/r until r reaches the value a. At r cr, the energy becomes infinitely positive this is shown by the vertical line in Fig. 26.6(a). This form of the interaction energy results from the supposition that the molecules are hard spheres of diameter cr. 

This form of the interaction law is called the Lennard-Jones potential. In practice the law is most easily handled if n = 12 it is then called a 6-12 potential. The shape of the Lennard-Jones potential is shown in Fig. 26.6(b). 

In Section 26.1 it was shown that the boiling point is a qualitative measure of the interaction energy between the molecules of the substance. Three contributions make up the interaction energy  

The orientation effect, produced by the mutual action of the permanent dipole moments of the molecules  

The distortion effect, produced by the interaction of an induced dipole moment of one molecule with the permanent dipole moment of another molecule  

---

Molecular dynamics consists of the brute-force solution of Newton s equations of motion. It is necessary to encode in the program the potential energy and force law of interaction between molecules the equations of motion are solved numerically, by finite difference techniques. The system evolution corresponds closely to what happens in real life and allows us to calculate dynamical properties, as well as thennodynamic and structural fiinctions. For a range of molecular models, packaged routines are available, either connnercially or tlirough the academic conmuinity. 

During the next decades after the appearance of the Volta pile and of different other versions of batteries, fundamental laws of electrodynamics and electromagnetism were formulated based on experiments carried out with electric current supplied by batteries Ampere s law of interaction between electrical currents (1820), Ohm s law of proportionality between current and voltage (1827), the laws of electromagnetic induction (Faraday, 1831), Joule s law of the thermal effect of electric current, and many others. 

He describes molecular populations mathematically in the way physicists calculate classical dynamic systems. Very exact dynamic equations are devised, while the laws of interaction are left very general. This leads to a general theory of molecular systems, which makes it possible to define what is understood by the origin of metabolism (Dyson, 1999). 

This last property is verified for certain laws of interaction. It is neither general nor necessary to obtain results of the same type as those which we shall present. In the following discussion Eq. (39) will be considered as a sufficient condition for the equations of evolution which we shall write down to be valid. 

Later, considering the problem from a macroscopic point of view, H. Casi-mir and D. Polder (Netherlands, 1948), and E. M. Lifshitz (1954), obtained a different, more rapid law of interaction decay. Only recently L. P. Pitaevskii showed that the contradiction does not indicate an error Ya.B. studied an extreme case of large Debye radius, and this case is realizable in principle. 

The hydrogen atom is the simplest one in existence, and the only one for which essentially exact theoretical calculations can be made on the basis of the fairly well confirmed Coulomb law of interaction and the Dirac equation for the electron. Such refinements as the motion of the proton and the magnetic interaction with the spin of the proton are taken into account in rather approximate fashion. Nevertheless, the experimental situation at present is such that the observed spectrum of the hydrogen atom does not provide a very critical test either of the theory or of the Coulomb law of interaction between point charges. A critical test would be obtained from a measurement of the fine structure of the n = 2 quantum state. 

The important feature of such an equation of state is that it contains only quantities which can be obtained from the law of interaction, and enables the properties of liquids to be calculated from well defined molecular constants. 

The model of a liquid developed in 6 of chap. XII can be applied to the present problem. Just as in (12.59) we assume that the law of interaction between a molecule i and a molecule j is of the form... 

No exact expression for ( )coiiision has been obtained since the nature of the interaction between the colliding molecules is not known in sufficient details. We resort to assume by hypothesis some laws of interaction which are validated comparing the overall results with experimental data. 

Thus in the preceding pages we have made continual use of the laws of interaction of charged particles, and of their response to the influence of external fields and light rays. The most important resxdt, that the mass of an atom is almost wholly concentrated in a very small nucleus, while its volume, and its physical and chemical properties, are determined by a comparatively loose surrounding structure of electrons, we have assumed without proof. This proof we must now supply. First, however, we must look a little more deeply into the laws of the electromagnetic field. 

Everything in the cosmos has a history. The old dichotomy between the historical sciences (like geology, paleontology and evolutionary biology) and the (for want of a better term) functional sciences (like physics and chemistry—some would call them the real sciences ) was always supposed to be that fields like physics study dynamic processes and discover immutable laws of interaction among particles composing the cosmos—while the historical sciences study, well, history— the supposed outcome of such interactions over time. 

Prom a practical point of view these last facts are very bad news indeed we have seen earlier in some detail the problems associated with the calculation of the large numbers of electron-repulsion integrals when a molecular wavefunction is expanded in terms of a basis set. If this calculation is to be complicated by a space-dependent law of interaction and three-body interactions then it will become prohibitively expensive in computing resources. 

The traditional specification of a molecule in classical chemistry is in terms of atoms joined by bonds, and this accounts for the central fact of chemistry that the generic molecular formula is associated with the occurrence of isomers. Such an approach does not provide a useful basis for a physical theory since we do not know the general laws of interaction between atoms. Instead a more abstract description in terms of the particle constituents of a molecule, electrons and nuclei, is employed. We shall confine the discussion to the nonrelativistic level of theory with this proviso the interactions between electrons and nuclei are assumed to be fully specified by Coulomb s law, and this makes possible the explicit formulation of a molecular Hamiltonian. This so-called Coulomb Hamiltonian will be given explicitly (O Eq. 2.1) in the next section it forms the starting point of the chapter. 

The physical content of this relation is most clearly imderstood when using a specific law of interaction such as the (6-12) law and reduced quantities for each of the three interactions SAA(f), SAsi ), sB(r). As our one-dimensional model can certainly not give any reliable information about effects of differences in sizes, we simply take the diameters fif in the (6-12) law as equal (cf. 2.7.1). We may use (6.3.13)-(6.3.15) and write (6.4.5) in the form... 

In Eulerian particle modeling, the particles are considered as a continuous fluid, just like the gas. This fluid interpenetrates with the gas in the cyclone, and interacts with it, in accordance with the known laws of interaction, for instance, Stokes law. Transport equations, which are coupled through the interaction terms, are solved for both fluid and particle phases. 

As the London forces are essentially of electric origin, a certain time is necessary for their propagation and it can be expected that a more complete treatment, taking account of relativistic effects, may change the laws of interaction If indeed the correspondence picture of the previous subsection is followed more closely, it would be... 

---