Coulomb Hamiltonian

In this work, relativistic effects are included in the no-pah or large component only approximation [13]. The total electronic Hamiltonian is H (r R) = H (r R) + H (r R), where H (r R) is the nom-elativistic Coulomb Hamiltonian and R) is a spin-orbit Hamiltonian. The relativistic (nomelativistic) eigenstates, are eigenfunctions of R)(H (r R)). Lower (upper)... 

The first basic ingredient in our description of the electric double layer is the coulombic interaction. It seems quite natural to assume that the fields are coupled according to a coulombic Hamiltonian of the same... 

Then, there are model Hamiltonians. Effectively a model Hamiltonian includes only some effects, in order to focus on those effects. It is generally simpler than the true full Coulomb Hamiltonian, but is made that way to focus on a particular aspect, be it magnetization, Coulomb interaction, diffusion, phase transitions, etc. A good example is the set of model Hamiltonians used to describe the IETS experiment and (more generally) vibronic and vibrational effects in transport junctions. Special models are also used to deal with chirality in molecular transport junctions [42, 43], as well as optical excitation, Raman excitation [44], spin dynamics, and other aspects that go well beyond the simple transport phenomena associated with these systems. 

The solute-solvent system, from the physical point of view, is nothing but a system that can be decomposed in a determined collection of electrons and nuclei. In the many-body representation, in principle, solving the global time-dependent Schrodinger equation with appropriate boundary conditions would yield a complete description for all measurable properties [47], This equation requires a definition of the total Hamiltonian in coordinate representation H(r,X), where r is the position vector operator for all electrons in the sample, and X is the position vector operator of the nuclei. In molecular quantum mechanics, as it is used in this section, H(r,X) is the Coulomb Hamiltonian[46]. The global wave function A(r,X,t) is obtained as a solution of the equation ... 

The total Coulomb Hamiltonian can always be written as a sum of terms describing arbitrary subsystems ... 

Fig. 1. BLYP/uncDZ mean dipole polarizability of the mercury atom as a function of frequency. All values in atomic units. SR+SO refers to calculations based on the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonians, whereas SR refers to calculations in which all spin-orbit interaction has been eliminated.

Table 5. The NMR shielding constant and shielding polarizabilities of the xenon atom calculated at the Hartree-Fock level using the Drrac-Coulomb Hamiltonian (SR + SO), its spin-free version (SR) as well as the non-relativistic Levy-Leblond Hamiltonian. The shielding constant is given in ppm and shielding polarizabilities in ppm/(au field2) (1 a.u. field = 5.14220642X 10" V...

A natural generalization of Eq. (6) would be to choose the parameters in all one-electron small components of the two-electron wavefunction (30) to maximize E and then to choose the parameters in all one-electron large components to minimize E. However, in order to solve variationally the eigenvalue problem of the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, Kolakowska et al [12] advocated, on the basis of rather intuitive arguments, the following mle ... 

For the electro-nuclear model, it is the charge the only homogeneous element between electron and nuclear states. The electronic part corresponds to fermion states, each one represented by a 2-spinor and a space part. Thus, it has always been natural to use the Coulomb Hamiltonian Hc(q,Q) as an entity to work with. The operator includes the electronic kinetic energy (Ke) and all electrostatic interaction operators (Vee + VeN + Vnn)- In fact this is a key operator for describing molecular physics events [1-3]. Let us consider the electronic space problem first exact solutions exist for this problem the wavefunctions are defined as /(q) do not mix up these functions with the previous electro-nuclear wavefunctions. At this level. He and S (total electronic spin operator) commute the spin operator appears in the kinematic operator V and H commute with the total angular momentum J=L+S in the I-ffame L is the total orbital angular momentum, the system is referred to a unique origin. 

The caveat is that integration over electronic configuration space is performed first. Any physical base quantum state with respect to the Coulomb Hamiltonian is a robust species. Observe that no structural features are implied yet. Thus, separability via electronic quantum numbers is achieved although the general quantum states E(q,Q,t) are not separable. 

Consider now the equality Hoj> n Jm=8j>j. Thus, in this model, preparing the system in the ground state of the Coulomb Hamiltonian, no time evolution can be expected if we do not switch on the kinematic couplings. We take a simple case where the electron-phonon coupling is on. The matrix elements of H in this base set look like ... 

The corrections of order (Za) are just the first order matrix elements of the Breit interaction between the Coulomb-Schrodinger eigenfunctions of the Coulomb Hamiltonian Hq in (3.1). The mass dependence of the Breit interaction is known exactly, and the same is true for its matrix elements. These matrix elements and, hence, the exact mass dependence of the contributions to the energy levels of order (Za), beyond the reduced mass, were first obtained a long time ago [2]... 

If we refrain from such a restriction and consider a spin-operator-dependent Hamiltonian, such as the 4-component KS Hamiltonian or the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, the Hamiltonian does not commute with the square of the spin operator. The square of the spin operator and the Hamiltonian then do not share the same set of eigenfunctions, and hence spin is no longer a good quantum number. In this noncollinear framework we must therefore find a different solution and may define a spin density equal to the magnetization vector (32). 

From the perspective of non-relativistic quantum mechanics, a collection of electrons and atomic nuclei interact through the Coulomb Hamiltonian... 

We have already seen in Sec. 3.1 that before the Born-Oppenheimer separation of nuclear and electronic motion is made, the Coulomb Hamiltonian has very high symmetry, but that the clamped-nucleus Hamiltonian has only the spatial symmetry of the nuclear framework. That is, the Hamiltonian... 

DIRAC-COULOMB HAMILTONIAN AND TWO-COMPONENT BASIS SPINORS... 

Within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, the total electronic Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian is written as... 

The Coulombic Hamiltonian (4.1) is invariant under translations and rotations, and it is hence convenient to separate the motion of the "center of mass" % and to study the new Hamiltonian ... 

In 1929, Linus Pauling, together with Boris Podolosky, became the first person to publish the momentum representation of the eigenfunctions of a single-particle Coulombic Hamiltonian. Although he did not publish any more work on momentum space concepts, he is nonetheless a pioneer in the field of Momentum Space Quantum Chemistry. 

The use of non-relativistic basis functions in (a) requires that the SO interaction can be considered as a relatively weak perturbation of the non-relativistic Hamiltonian, which typically is the case for second- and third-row atoms and transition metals. For systems with heavier atoms, two-component relativistic electronic basis functions should be employed or the analysis should be based on the four-component Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian. 

---