Lattice microscopic

This approximation, known as Vegard s laM>, accurately describes the average lattice constant (but not the microscopic stmcture ) of most ternary compounds. However, the expression for the gap must be modified by the inclusion of a quadratic tenn... 

A crystal is a solid with a periodic lattice of microscopic components. This arrangement of atoms is determined primarily by X-ray structure analysis. The smallest unit, called the unit cell, defines the complete crystal, including its symmetry. Characteristic crystallographic 3D structures are available in the fields of inorganic, organic, and organometallic compounds, macromolecules, such as proteins and nucleic adds. 

Figure 19.2 shows, at a microscopic level, what is going on. Atoms diffuse from the grain boundary which must form at each neck (since the particles which meet there have different orientations), and deposit in the pore, tending to fill it up. The atoms move by grain boundary diffusion (helped a little by lattice diffusion, which tends to be slower). The reduction in surface area drives the process, and the rate of diffusion controls its rate. This immediately tells us the two most important things we need to know about solid state sintering ... 

Most microscopic theories of adsorption and desorption are based on the lattice gas model. One assumes that the surface of a sohd can be divided into two-dimensional cells, labelled i, for which one introduces microscopic variables Hi = 1 or 0, depending on whether cell i is occupied by an adsorbed gas particle or not. (The connection with magnetic systems is made by a transformation to spin variables cr, = 2n, — 1.) In its simplest form a lattice gas model is restricted to the submonolayer regime and to gas-solid systems in which the surface structure and the adsorption sites do not change as a function of coverage. To introduce the dynamics of the system one writes down a model Hamiltonian which, for the simplest system of a one-component adsorbate with one adsorption site per unit cell, is... 

If it cannot be guaranteed that the adsorbate remains in local equilibrium during its time evolution, then a set of macroscopic variables is not sufficient and an approach based on nonequihbrium statistical mechanics involving time-dependent distribution functions must be invoked. The kinetic lattice gas model is an example of such a theory [56]. It is derived from a Markovian master equation, but is not totally microscopic in that it is based on a phenomenological Hamiltonian. We demonstrate this approach... 

The fact that detailed balance provides only half the number of constraints to fix the unknown coefficients in the transition probabilities is not really surprising considering that, if it would fix them all, then the static (lattice gas) Hamiltonian would dictate the kind of kinetics possible in the system. Again, this cannot be so because this Hamiltonian does not include the energy exchange dynamics between adsorbate and substrate. As a result, any functional relation between the A and D coefficients in (44) must be postulated ad hoc (or calculated from a microscopic Hamiltonian that accounts for couphng of the adsorbate to the lattice or electronic degrees of freedom of the substrate). Several scenarios have been discussed in the literature [57]. 

Even though the basic idea of the Widom model is certainly very appealing, the fact that it ignores the possibihty that oil/water interfaces are not saturated with amphiphiles is a disadvantage in some respect. The influence of the amphiphiles on interfacial properties cannot be studied in principle in particular, the reduction of the interfacial tension cannot be calculated. In a sense, the Widom model is not only the first microscopic lattice model, but also the first random interface model configurations are described entirely by the conformations of their amphiphilic sheets. 

The function / incorporates the screening effect of the surfactant, and is the surfactant density. The exponent x can be derived from the observation that the total interface area at late times should be proportional to p. In two dimensions, this implies R t) oc 1/ps and hence x = /n. The scaling form (20) was found to describe consistently data from Langevin simulations of systems with conserved order parameter (with n = 1/3) [217], systems which evolve according to hydrodynamic equations (with n = 1/2) [218], and also data from molecular dynamics of a microscopic off-lattice model (with n= 1/2) [155]. The data collapse has not been quite as good in Langevin simulations which include thermal noise [218]. 

In the CHS model only nearest neighbors interact, and the interactions between amphiphiles in the simplest version of the model are neglected. In the case of the oil-water symmetry only two parameters characterize the interactions b is the strength of the water-water (oil-oil) interaction, and c describes the interaction between water (oil) and an amphiphile. The interaction between amphiphiles and ordinary molecules is proportional to a scalar product between the orientation of the amphiphile and the distance between the particles. In Ref. 15 the CHS model is generalized, and M orientations of amphiphiles uniformly distributed over the sphere are considered, with M oo. Every lattice site is occupied either by an oil, water, or surfactant particle in an orientation ujf, there are thus 2 + M microscopic states at every lattice site. The microscopic density of the state i is p.(r) = 1(0) if the site r is (is not) occupied by the state i. We denote the sum and the difference of microscopic oil and water densities by and 2 respectively and the density of surfactant at a point r and an orientation by p (r) = p r,U(). The microscopic densities assume the values = 1,0, = 1,0 and 2 = ill 0- In close-packing case the total density of surfactant ps(r) is related to by p = Ylf Pi = 1 - i i. The Hamiltonian of this model has the following form [15]... 

B. Derivation of the Mesoscopic Modei from the Microscopic Lattice Modei... 

A. Ciach, J. S. Hoye, G. Stell. Microscopic model for microemulsion. II. Behavior at low temperatures and critical point. J Chem Phys 90 1222-1228, 1989. A. Ciach. Phase diagram and structure of the bicontinuous phase in a three dimensional lattice model for oil-water-surfactant mixtures. J Chem Phys 95 1399-1408, 1992. 

Crystals are sohds. Sohds, on the other hand can be crystalhne, quasi-crystal-hne, or amorphous. Sohds differ from liquids by a shear modulus different from zero so that solids can support shearing forces. Microscopically this means that there exists some long-range orientational order in the sohd. The orientation between a pair of atoms at some point in the solid and a second (arbitrary) pair of atoms at a distant point must on average remain fixed if a shear modulus should exist. Crystals have this orientational order and in addition a translational order their atoms are arranged in regular lattices. 

These apparent restrictions in size and length of simulation time of the fully quantum-mechanical methods or molecular-dynamics methods with continuous degrees of freedom in real space are the basic reason why the direct simulation of lattice models of the Ising type or of solid-on-solid type is still the most popular technique to simulate crystal growth processes. Consequently, a substantial part of this article will deal with scientific problems on those time and length scales which are simultaneously accessible by the experimental STM methods on one hand and by Monte Carlo lattice simulations on the other hand. Even these methods, however, are too microscopic to incorporate the boundary conditions from the laboratory set-up into the models in a reahstic way. Therefore one uses phenomenological models of the phase-field or sharp-interface type, and finally even finite-element methods, to treat the diffusion transport and hydrodynamic convections which control a reahstic crystal growth process from the melt on an industrial scale. 

There are cases where non-regular lattices may be of advantage [36,37]. The computational effort, however, is substantially larger, which makes the models less flexible concerning changes of boundary conditions or topological constraints. Another direction, which may be promising in the future, is the use of hybrid models, where for example local attachment kinetics are treated on a microscopic atomistic scale, while the transport properties are treated by macroscopic partial differential equations [5,6]. 

It should be realized that unlike the study of equilibrium thermodynamics for which a model is often mapped onto Ising system, elementary mechanism of atomic motion plays a deterministic role in the kinetic study. In an actual alloy system, diffusion of an atomic species is mainly driven by vacancy mechanism. The incorporation of the vacancy mechanism into PPM formalism, however, is not readily achieved, since the abundant freedom of microscopic path of atomic movement demands intractable number of variational parameters. The present study is, therefore, limited to a simple spin kinetics, known as Glauber dynamics [14] for which flipping events at fixed lattice points drive the phase transition. Hence, the present study for a spin system is regarded as a precursor to an alloy kinetics. The limitation of the model is critically examined and pointed out in the subsequent sections. 

In the PPF, the first factor Pi describes the statistical average of non-correlated spin fiip events over entire lattice points, and the second factor P2 is the conventional thermal activation factor. Hence, the product of P and P2 corresponds to the Boltzmann factor in the free energy and gives the probability that on<= of the paths specified by a set of path variables occurs. The third factor P3 characterizes the PPM. One may see the similarity with the configurational entropy term of the CVM (see eq.(5)), which gives the multiplicity, i.e. the number of equivalent states. In a similar sense, P can be viewed as the number of equivalent paths, i.e. the degrees of freedom of the microscopic evolution from one state to another. As was pointed out in the Introduction section, mathematical representation of P3 depends on the mechanism of elementary kinetics. It is noted that eqs.(8)-(10) are valid only for a spin kinetics. 

Heterogeneities associated with a metal have been classified in Table 1.1 as atomic see Fig. 1.1), microscopic (visible under an optical microscope), and macroscopic, and their effects are considered in various sections of the present work. It is relevant to observe, however, that the detailed mechanism of all aspects of corrosion, e.g. the passage of a metallic cation from the lattice to the solution, specific effects of ions and species in solution in accelerating or inhibiting corrosion or causing stress-corrosion cracking, etc. must involve a consideration of the detailed atomic structure of the metal or alloy. 

Electron diffraction investigations showed that epitaxy did indeed exist when one metal was electrodeposited on another, but that it persisted for only tens or hundreds of atomic layers beyond the interface. Thereafter the atomic structure (or lattice) of the deposit altered to one characteristic of the plating conditions. Epitaxy ceased before an electrodeposit is thick enough to see with an optic microscope, and at thicknesses well below those at which pseudomorphism is observed. 

Lattice gases are micro-level rule-based simulations of macro-level fluid behavior. Lattice-gas models provide a powerful new tool in modeling real fluid behavior ([doolenQO], [doolenQl]). The idea is to reproduce the desired macroscopic behavior of a fluid by modeling the underlying microscopic dynamics. 

---