Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Microscope Components

Generally, a high resonance frequency is desirable so that a number of oscillations takes place at each image point, even during rapid scanning. [Pg.98]

The other cantilever property is the quality factor, Q, a measure of cantilever damping. This is inversely proportional to the damping factor. It is also the ratio of the resonance frequency cOo to the full frequency width at half maximum of the resonance, defined in terms of energy. [Pg.98]

In contact mode AFM, k might range from 0.01 to 1.0 N/m for intermittent contact mode AFM (IC-AFM), often called tapping mode AFM (TMAFM), it ranges from 3 N/m to 500N/m. [Pg.98]

For modes like IC-AFM where the cantilever is oscillating, there are two other properties that are important, in addition to the spring constant. One is the resonance frequency of the [Pg.98]

In terms of amplitude, A is the frequency range where the amplitude is greater than 1/ of the value at resonance. [Pg.98]


A crystal is a solid with a periodic lattice of microscopic components. This arrangement of atoms is determined primarily by X-ray structure analysis. The smallest unit, called the unit cell, defines the complete crystal, including its symmetry. Characteristic crystallographic 3D structures are available in the fields of inorganic, organic, and organometallic compounds, macromolecules, such as proteins and nucleic adds. [Pg.258]

When microscopists began to look at the tissues of living forms they already had in their minds a view of matter as an aggregate of more or less uniform microscopic components. It is therefore understandable that when they saw everywhere agglomerations of more or less spherical halations, they concluded that these optical illusions were the fundamental subunits of animate matter, and when they actually saw cells they had no idea what they were (Harris, 1999, p. 39-... [Pg.86]

Fig. 1. Comparisons of the wide-field, flying spot, pinhole detector, and pinhole confocal microscopes. Components include an excitation light source (V), an excitation filter (E), a dichromatic mirror (DM), an emission barrier filter (B), an objective lens (n), a detector (D), and a pinhole (P). Fig. 1. Comparisons of the wide-field, flying spot, pinhole detector, and pinhole confocal microscopes. Components include an excitation light source (V), an excitation filter (E), a dichromatic mirror (DM), an emission barrier filter (B), an objective lens (n), a detector (D), and a pinhole (P).
FIGURE 4.1 The setup of the nonlinear multicontrast microscope. Microscope components are defined in the figure legend. See text for detailed description of the setup. [Pg.81]

The above discussion is sufficient to indicate that a promising start has now been made in the understanding of the transport properties of composite polymer membranes when the microscopic component domains are well defined and do not interact appreaciably with one another or with the penetrant. [Pg.118]

In this chapter a new technique for the IR spectroscopic analysis of individual microscopic components in coals is described. This method combines new procedures for preparing uncontaminated thin section specimens of coal with a sensitive IR microspectrophotometer which has recently become commercially available. Details of this new technique are discussed and some representative spectra are described. [Pg.55]

The process of image formation in aTEM can be described by combining several principles of physics and must be interpreted in the context of the physical design of the microscope. To this end, the general design and function of the microscope components will be combined with the necessary theoretical considerations in the brief description that follows. Voluminous literature exists that describes the TEM in greater detail, and the reader is referred to two texts for more comprehensive information (4, 5). [Pg.76]

Although there is notoriously no unanimous agreement on what the supervenience relationship is, the most popular view is that supervenience is a relationship of asymmetric dependence. Two macroscopic systems which have been constructed from identical microscopic components are assumed to show identical macroscopic properties, whereas the observation of identical macroscopic properties in any two systems need not necessarily imply identity at the microscopic level. In simpler terms, the phenomena we study in some secondary science are thought to be ontologically dependent upon relationships at the primary level whereas macroscopic identity need not imply microscopic identity. [Pg.17]

As an example to contextualise the supervenience argument, Scerri McIntyre (1997) consider the property of smell. If two chemical compounds were synthesised out of elementary particles in an identical manner, they would share the same smell. Similarly the supervenience argument would entail that if two compounds share the same macroscopic property of smell, we could not necessarily infer that the microscopic components from which the compounds are formed would be identical. Such scenarios can be explored by biochemists and neurophysiologists but whatever the outcome, the question of supervenience of chemistry on physics will depend on empirical facts and not on philosophical considerations. [Pg.17]

Rate events are fluctuations and statistical averaging requires a large number of them. If the time scale of averaging is long compared with the amplification of the fluctuations, symmetry breaking occms and one enantiomer dominates. This view is in line with mathematical analysis which shows that macroscopic behavior derived from collective dynamics of microscopic components cannot be modeled using spatially continuous density functions. One needs to take into account the actual individual/discrete character of the microscopic components of the system. [Pg.373]

Smell is a rather curious property in that its perception is thought to arise from a lock-and-key mechanism, whereby a certain molecular shape will trigger a particular smell receptor, and thus produce the sensation of a particular odor. Seen in this way, it would seem that two vastly different molecules which share the same molecular side-chain (which is required to trigger a certain smell receptor) would do so irrespective of the structure of the rest of the molecule. This view would suggest that the same smell might indeed result from different molecules having different microscopic components... [Pg.38]

Figure 3.11 Schematic of an optical tweezer setup. It consists of an optical video microscope (components within dotted line) and the components needed for the laser trap. The laser beam is widened by a beam expander and coupled into the microscope bya dichroic mirror. The beam is focused on a diffraction limited spot by the high numerical aperture objective to form... Figure 3.11 Schematic of an optical tweezer setup. It consists of an optical video microscope (components within dotted line) and the components needed for the laser trap. The laser beam is widened by a beam expander and coupled into the microscope bya dichroic mirror. The beam is focused on a diffraction limited spot by the high numerical aperture objective to form...

See other pages where Microscope Components is mentioned: [Pg.606]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.125]   


SEARCH



Basic components of a simple optical microscope

Chemical components microscopic

Scanning confocal microscopes components

Scanning electron microscope components

Secondary electron microscope components

Transmission electron microscope components

© 2024 chempedia.info