Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Kinetics surface-controlled

To appreciate the impact of SECM on the study of phase transfer kinetics, it is useful to briefly review the basic steps in reactions at solid/liquid interfaces. Processes of dissolution (growth) or desorption (adsorption), which are of interest herein, may be described in terms of some, or all, of the series of events shown in Figure 1. Although somewhat simplistic, this schematic identifies the essential elements in addressing the kinetics of interfacial processes. In one limit, when any of the surface processes in Figure 1 (e.g., the detachment of ions or molecules from an active site, surface diffusion of a species across the surface, or desorption) are slow compared to the mass transport step between the bulk solution and the interface, the reaction is kinetically surface-controlled. In the other limit, if the surface events are fast compared to mass transport, the overall process is in a mass transport-controlled regime. [Pg.521]

Characteristic of most equations for surface-controlled kinetics, as opposed to diffusion-controlled kinetics, are a number of partial pressure terms, often to high powers. When large changes in partial pressures are made, differences between the observed and the calculated reaction can easily equal a factor of 1000 or more. When diffusion-type kinetics are used, one seldom finds differences exceeding a factor of two or three. While this may not seem very accurate, comparison of the two methods is rather startling. [Pg.76]

The development and control of microstracture are critical in the processing of ceramics and cements. The chemical engineer s knowledge of reaction kinetics, surface phenomena, and transport phenomena could contribute effectively to the development of new materials. [Pg.179]

Baskaran and Santschi (1993) examined " Th from six shallow Texas estuaries. They found dissolved residence times ranged from 0.08 to 4.9 days and the total residence time ranged from 0.9 and 7.8 days. They found the Th dissolved and total water column residence times were much shorter in the summer. This was attributed to the more energetic particle resuspension rates during the summer sampling. They also observed an inverse relation between distribution coefficients and particle concentrations, implying that kinetic factors control Th distribution. Baskaran et al. (1993) and Baskaran and Santschi (2002) showed that the residence time of colloidal and particulate " Th residence time in the coastal waters are considerably lower (1.4 days) than those in the surface waters in the shelf and open ocean (9.1 days) of the Western Arctic Ocean (Baskaran et al. 2003). Based on the mass concentrations of colloidal and particulate matter, it was concluded that only a small portion of the colloidal " Th actively participates in Arctic Th cycling (Baskaran et al. 2003). [Pg.591]

Stumm, W. and R. Wollast, 1990, Coordination chemistry of weathering, kinetics of the surface-controlled dissolution of oxide minerals. Reviews of Geophysics 28, 53-69. [Pg.531]

The Kinetics of Surface Controlled Dissolution of Oxide Minerals an Introduction to Weathering... [Pg.157]

The morphology of weathered feldspar surfaces, and the nature of the clay products, contradicts the protective-surface-layer hypothesis. The presence of etch pits implies a surface-controlled reaction, rather than a diffusion (transport) controlled reaction. Furthermore, the clay coating could not be "protective" in the sense of limiting diffusion. Finally, Holdren and Berner (11) demonstrated that so-called "parabolic kinetics" of feldspar dissolution were largely due to enhanced dissolution of fine particles. None of these findings, however, addressed the question of the apparent non-stoichiometric release of alkalis, alkaline earths, silica, and aluminum. This question has been approached both directly (e.g., XPS) and indirectly (e.g., material balance from solution data). [Pg.623]

For the same A R reaction, when kinetics are controlled by adsorption of reactant A rather than by surface reaction, the Langmuir-Hinshelwood rate expression becomes equal to the following [2] ... [Pg.405]

These are shown on an Arrhenius plot (Figure 10) and exhibit an activation energy of 64 kJ/mol (+ 8%). The high activation energy and the second order dependence. Implies that surface kinetics Is controlling In the growth mechanism. [Pg.305]

Information about the kinetics of dissolution reactions is provided by Delmon (1969) and by Brown et al. (1980). Dissolution may be either diffusion (i.e., transport) or surface controlled. If diffusion controlled, i. e., if the concentration of dissolved species immediately adjacent to the surface corresponds to the equilibrium solubility (Ce) of the solid phase, the concentration, c, of the dissolved species is diffusion controlled and increases with the square root of time, t, i. e.. [Pg.324]

This technique was proposed by Bruckenstein and co-workers [280, 281] and is useful in that the current due to the modulation of the fluid flow is essentially free of any electrode surface-controlled contributions in most cases. Thus, it can be used as an analytical tool to increase sensitivity [282]. Step changes were originally considered but this was later extended to sinusoidal hydrodynamic modulation (SHM) in the limiting current region and then to the region of mixed convective-diffusion/kinetic control [283—287]. If the modulation frequency is o, then the modulation, which is small, can be described by... [Pg.432]

The Damkohler numbers are useful measures of the characteristic transport time relative to the reaction time. If the surface Damkohler number (sometimes referred to as the CVD number see reference 7) is large, mass transfer to the surface controls the growth. For small Damkohler numbers, surface kinetics governs the deposition. Similarly, if the gas-phase Damkohler number is large, the reactor residence time is an important factor, whereas if it is small, gas-phase reactions control the deposition. [Pg.235]

We see therefore that photoactive semiconductor particles provide ideal environments for control of interfacial electron transfer. Photoinduced electron-hole pairs formed on irradiated semiconductor suspensions, as in photoelectrochemical cells, allow for reactivity control not available in homogeneous solution. This altered activity derives from controlled adsorption on a chemically manipula-ble surface, controlled potential afforded by the valence band edge positions, controlled kinetics by virtue of band bending effects, and controlled current flow by judicious choice of incident light intensity. [Pg.83]

W. Stumm and R. Wollast. Coordination chemistry of weathering Kinetics of the surface-controlled dissolution of oxide minerals, Rev. Geophys. 28 53 (1990). See also A. E. Blum and A. C. Lasaga, The role of surface speciation in the dissolution of albite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 55 2193 (1990). [Pg.132]

Follow the approach in Section 4.2 to derive a rate law for a homovalent cation exchange reaction described by Eq. 5.6 under the assumption that the kinetics are surface controlled. Compare your result with the Bunzl rate law in Eq. 5.54. (Hint Show that Eq. 4.26 generalizes to the rate law ... [Pg.220]

Modeling hydrogeochemical processes requires a detailed and accurate water analysis, as well as thermodynamic and kinetic data as input. Thermodynamic data, such as complex formation constants and solubility products, are often provided as data sets within the respective programs. However, the description of surface-controlled reactions (sorption, cation exchange, surface complexation) and kinetically controlled reactions requires additional input data. [Pg.204]

Unlike groundwater flow and transport models, thermodynamic models, in principal, do not need any calibration. However, considering surface-controlled or kinetically controlled reaction models might be subject to calibration. [Pg.204]

In surface-controlled catalyses, the rate-determining step involves the reaction on the surface of an adsorbed reactant or of a derived species. The resultant kinetics may be more or less complicated depending upon the circumstances, and treatments of various cases have been given in reviews dealing with the heterogeneous catalysis of gas reactions [9, 31, 42]. Several... [Pg.76]

In all these three types of surface-controlled catalysis, it is advisable to check the adsorption inferences reached by interpretation of the experimental kinetic law. Wherever possible, independent adsorption experiments should be carried out with the individual substances concerned. Alternatively, or in addition, infrared and preferably FTIR measurements will often reveal useful information on the presence and state of adsorbed species. [Pg.83]


See other pages where Kinetics surface-controlled is mentioned: [Pg.184]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.281]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.604 , Pg.605 ]




SEARCH



Control with Finite Surface Kinetics

Control: surfaces

Kinetic controlled

Kinetic surface-controlled

Kinetic surface-controlled

Kinetically control

Kinetically controlled

Kinetics surface versus transport control

Kinetics surface-reaction control

Kinetics surfaces

Kinetics, surface-reaction controlling

Mineral surface-controlled dissolution kinetics

Surface kinetics control

Surface kinetics control

Surface-controlled kinetics, crystal

Surface-deposition, controlled kinetic

© 2024 chempedia.info