Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Kinetics, adsorption product formation effect

The influence of electronegative additives on the CO hydrogenation reaction corresponds mainly to a reduction in the overall catalyst activity.131 This is shown for example in Fig. 2.42 which compares the steady-state methanation activities of Ni, Co, Fe and Ru catalysts relative to their fresh, unpoisoned activities as a function of gas phase H2S concentration. The distribution of the reaction products is also affected, leading to an increase in the relative amount of higher unsaturated hydrocarbons at the expense of methane formation.6 Model kinetic studies of the effect of sulfur on the methanation reaction on Ni(lOO)132,135 and Ru(OOl)133,134 at near atmospheric pressure attribute this behavior to the inhibition effect of sulfur to the dissociative adsorption rate of hydrogen but also to the drastic decrease in the... [Pg.81]

In this section, we will present results of microldnetics simulations based on elementary reaction energy schemes deduced from quantum chemical studies. We use an adapted scheme to enable analysis of the results in terms of the values of elementary rate constants selected. For the same reason, we ignore surface concentration dependence of adsorption energies, whereas this can be readily implemented in the simulations. We are interested in general trends and especially the temperature dependence of overall reaction rates. The simulations will also provide us with information on surface concentrations. In the simulations to be presented here, we exclude product readsorption effects. Microldnetics simulations are attractive since they do not require an assumption of rate-controlling steps or equilibration. Solutions for overall rates are found by solving the complete set of PDFs with proper initial conditions. While in kinetic Monte Carlo simulations these expressions are solved using stochastic techniques, which enable formation... [Pg.564]

The kinetics and mechanism of methane combustion have been the subject of many investigations, e.g.. Refs. 43-47, because of the importance of natural gas as a potential fuel for catalytic combustors. Under conditions expected in catalytic combustors, i.e., excess oxygen, a first order in methane is generally observed [48], whercas a variety of orders has been observed for other hydrocarbons [13]. The actual mechanism appears to be quite complex and depends on the fuel used. For instance, inhibiting effects are observed for the products carbon dioxide and water in methane combustion over supported palladium catalysts [49,50]. The inhibition of methane adsorption and the formation of a surface palladium hydroxide were proposed to explain the observation. [Pg.159]

A kinetic study of the acylation of phenol with phenyl acetate was carried out in liquid phase at 160°C over HBEA zeolite samples, sulfolane or dodecane being used as solvents. The initial rates of hydroxyacetophenone (HAP) production were similar in both solvents. However the catalyst deactivation was faster in dodecane, most likely because of the faster formation of heavy reaction products such as bisphenol A derivatives. Moreover, sulfolane had a very positive effect on p-HAP formation and a negative one on o-HAP formation. To explain these observations as well as the influence of phenol and phenyl acetate concentrations on the rates of 0- and p-HAP formation it is proposed that sulfolane plays two independent roles in phenol acylation solvation of acylium ions intermediates and competition with phenyl acetate and phenol for adsorption on the acid sites. Donor substituents of phenyl acetate have a positive effect on the rate of anisole acylation, provided however there are no diffusion limitations in the zeolite pores. [Pg.91]

When y = 1 the reaction rate will be independent of oxygen concentration. It is also necessary to take into account the effect of reaction products on kinetics of the reaction. The rate of ethylene oxide formation is known to be inhibited both by ethylene oxide and C02. The measured shifts of with adsorption of these substances on silver have shown... [Pg.486]

Furthermore, modeling of the esterification reaction was attempted in the presence of silica nanoparticles during the formation of aliphatic polyester nanocomposites. From the experimental data, it was found that on increasing the Si02 content in esterification, the rate of water production decreases [47]. In addition, it was clear that the total quantity of water released does not depend on the nanoparticle concentration. This suggests that the existence of the particles does not influence the esterification reaction itself. Their main effect is to adsorb the produced water before it evaporates, altering in this way the water evaporation curve. The simplest model for this phenomenon is to assume very fast water adsorption/desorption kinetics on the Si02 particles. In this case, the evaporation kinetics must be explicitly taken into account because it is no more very fast compared to the other phenomena that occur. [Pg.98]

Each net rate in Equation 3.56 has the form of an effective resistance (i) the abundance of charge carriers available to pass the highest energy barrier is represented by the product of K values, and (ii) the mobility of these carriers is represented by the kinetic rate k. In the considered mechanism, three possible uphill steps exist, which all involve concerted proton-electron transfer processes. They correspond to adsorptive formation of OORad via Equation 3.40 with rate constant k, the intermediate step in Equation 3.42 with rate constant k, and desorptive formation of water in Equation 3.45 with rate constant k. ... [Pg.209]


See other pages where Kinetics, adsorption product formation effect is mentioned: [Pg.255]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.624]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.832]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.238]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.46 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption effect

Adsorption kinetic

Formate production

Formation kinetic

Kinetic products

Product effect

Product formation, effect

Productive adsorption

© 2024 chempedia.info