Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Kernel Selection

There are four commonly used kernel functions  [Pg.58]

If the data set is linear or nearly linear one, the linear kernel should be tried at first for computation, because a linear kernel usually exhibits better generalization ability. For nonlinear data set, the Gaussian kernel and polynomial kernel should be tried in computation at first [75 39 88]. [Pg.59]

Feature Selection Using Support Vector Machine [Pg.60]

Significance and Difficulty of Feature Selection in Chemical Data Processing [Pg.60]

Feature selection is one of the most important steps in chemical data processing. In many cases, the accuracy of feature selection is the decisive factor for the successful solution of practical problems by chemical data processing. [Pg.60]


Niculescu, S. P., Kaiser, K. L. E., and Schuurmann, G. (1998) Influence of data preprocessing and kernel selection on probabilistic neural network modeling of the acute toxicity of chemicals to the fathead minnow and Vibrio fischeri bacteria. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 33, 153-165. [Pg.365]

M. C. Jones, J.S. Marron and S.J. Sheather, Progress in datarbased bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation, Comput. Statist. 11 (1996), 337-381. [Pg.223]

Cocoa butter substitutes and equivalents differ greatly with respect to their method of manufacture, source of fats, and functionaHty they are produced by several physical and chemical processes (17,18). Cocoa butter substitutes are produced from lauric acid fats such as coconut, palm, and palm kernel oils by fractionation and hydrogenation from domestic fats such as soy, com, and cotton seed oils by selective hydrogenation or from palm kernel stearines by fractionation. Cocoa butter equivalents can be produced from palm kernel oil and other specialty fats such as shea and ilHpe by fractional crystallization from glycerol and selected fatty acids by direct chemical synthesis or from edible beef tallow by acetone crystallization. [Pg.93]

In the presence of air, the roots, coleoptile, mesocotyl, endosperm, scutellum, and anther wall of maize synthesise a tissue-specific spectrum of polypeptides. The scutellum and endosperm of the immature kernel synthesise many or all of the ANPs constitutively, along with many other proteins under aerobic conditions. Under anaerobic conditions all of the above organs selectively synthesise only the ANPs. Moreover, except for a few characteristic qualitative and quantitative differences, the patterns of anaerobic protein synthesis in these diverse organs are remarkably similar (Okimoto et al., 1980). On the other hand, maize leaves, which have emerged from the coleoptile, do not incorporate labelled amino acids under anaerobic conditions and do not survive even a brief exposure to anaerobiosis (Okimoto et al., 1980). [Pg.168]

The formulation in terms of binary kernels presents another advantage indeed, in the series (71) the selection rules (63) never impose k = 0. The terms k = 0 of Eq. (71) are not reducible and give negligible contributions to dbinary kernel is therefore irreducible. [Pg.344]

When n > 2, one can draw the reducible contributions made up of sequences of binary kernels and where states k = 0 between these kernels exist. Thus, the class associated with the skeleton of Fig. 3b contains a state k = 0 and contributes, not to Eq. (56), but to Eq. (70). In the following we shall need the relation which expresses Yg,- n) as the difference between ) and the ensemble of reducible contributions to (70) (of the type of Fig. 3b for n = 3, for example). It is necessary for us now to study systematically the points k = 0 of Eq. (70) so as to extract the reducible contributions. A study of the selection rules will permit us to solve this problem. We shall associate the appearance of the points k = 0 with the structure of the skeletons that we have introduced we shall see that the reduci-bility will be a dynamical translation of certain topological properties of the equilibrium clusters. [Pg.345]

The most important parameter choices for SVMs (Section 5.6) are the specification of the kernel function and the parameter y controlling the priority of the size constraint of the slack variables (see Section 5.6). We selected RBFs for the kernel because they are fast to compute. Figure 5.27 shows the misclassification errors for varying values of y by using the evaluation scheme described above for k-NN classification. The choice of y = 0.1 is optimal, and it leads to a test error of 0.34. [Pg.252]

Cho JH et al (2004) Gene selection and classification from microarray data using kernel machine. FEBS Lett 571 93-98. doi 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.087S001457 9304008142 (pii)... [Pg.471]

The ALLOC method with Kernel probability functions has a feature selection procedure based on prediction rates. This selection method has been used for miik >s5) and wine > data, and it has been compared with feature selection by SELECT and SLDA. Coomans et al. suggested the use of the loss matrix for a better evaluation of the relative importance of prediction errors. [Pg.135]

Tollner, E.W. and Hung, Y.C. 1992. Low resolution pulse magnetic resonance for measuring moisture in selected grains and kernels. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 53 195-208. [Pg.27]

Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a classification and regression method developed by Vapnik.30 In support vector regression (SVR), the input variables are first mapped into a higher dimensional feature space by the use of a kernel function, and then a linear model is constructed in this feature space. The kernel functions often used in SVM include linear, polynomial, radial basis function (RBF), and sigmoid function. The generalization performance of SVM depends on the selection of several internal parameters of the algorithm (C and e), the type of kernel, and the parameters of the kernel.31... [Pg.325]

Since most mycotoxins in agricultural materials are usually contained in a very small proportion of individual seeds or kernels the most practical and effective method of reducing the mycotoxin content of the whole commodity is to remove the contaminated seeds or kernels mechanically (West and Bullerman, 1991). Various techniques have been devised, based on colour and visual appearance of decay or damage to separate out contaminated seed etc. This may be manual or by more advanced electronic instrumental selection. [Pg.255]

Species and/or cultivar differences are also observed in other starch properties and in the properties of isolated amylose and amylopectin. To illustrate, purified amylose samples have been shown to differ in (3-amylolysis limit and average DP.64,67,124 Purified amylopectin samples have also been shown to differ in (3-amylolysis limit, average length of unit chains and viscosity.64,66 67 124,125 Campbell et al.121 observed a range of amylose content from 22.5% to 28.1% in 26 maize inbreds selected for maturity, kernel characteristics and pedigree. Starches from these non-mutant genotypes also differed in thermal properties (DSC), paste viscosities and gel strengths. [Pg.31]

Table 3.3 Mature kernel phenotype of normal and selected single, double, triple, and quadruple recessive maize genotypes ... Table 3.3 Mature kernel phenotype of normal and selected single, double, triple, and quadruple recessive maize genotypes ...
Dudley JW, Lambert RJ, Alexander DE. In Dudley JW, ed. Seventy Generations of Selection for Oil and Protein Concentration in the Maize Kernel Crop Science Society of America, Special Publication 1974 181-212. [Pg.432]

Here n Is the refractive Index of the medium and X Is the wavelength of Incident light In a vacuum. We modified Provencher program to call a subroutine which would supply values of (l (a)/a ) for the kernel of the Integral. The Initial solution Is that with little or no regularization. A chosen solution where the Increase In the objective function over the Initial solution could about 50% of the time be due to experimental noise and about 50% of the time be due to oversmoothing, Is selected by a statistical criterion (4,5). [Pg.108]

Often, calibration of natural products and materials is a desirable goal. In these kinds of assays, it is usually not feasible to control the composition of calibration and validation standards. Some well-known examples include the determination of protein, starch, and moisture in whole-wheat kernels and the determination of gasoline octane number by NIR spectroscopy. In cases such as these, sets of randomly selected samples must be obtained and analyzed by reference methods. [Pg.113]


See other pages where Kernel Selection is mentioned: [Pg.300]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.1112]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.249]   


SEARCH



Kernel function selection

© 2024 chempedia.info