Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Intermolecular potential, effect

Effective collision cross sections are related to the reduced matrix elements of the linearized collision operator It and incorporate all of the information about the binary molecular interactions, and therefore, about the intermolecular potential. Effective collision cross sections represent the collisional coupling between microscopic tensor polarizations which depend in general upon the reduced peculiar velocity C and the rotational angular momentum j. The meaning of the indices p, p q, q s, s and t, t is the same as already introduced for the basis tensors In the two-flux approach only cross sections of equal rank in velocity (p = p ) and zero rank in angular momentum (q = q = 0) enter die description of the traditional transport properties. Such cross sections are defined by... [Pg.35]

The empirical potentials for the molecules were obtained on the assumption of single attraction centers. This assumption is probably good for H2, fair for CH4 and N2, and very poor for Cl2. Even for molecules such as CH4 which are relatively spherical in shape, the fact that some atoms are near the outer surface rather than the center has an important effect. The closest interatomic distances are emphasized by the i 6 dependence of the potential. This point has been considered by several authors who worked out examples showing the net intermolecular potential for several models. [Pg.73]

In view of the complications of the intermolecular potential (as compared to the interatomic potential of the rare gas atoms) the comparisons for molecules in Tables II, III, and IV should be judged with caution. The apparent discrepancies from the theories for single atoms can be misleading. An example is the calculation for CH4 on the Slater-Kirkwood theory where Table IV shows the absurd value of 24 for the effective number of electrons. Pitzer and Catalano32 have applied the Slater-Kirkwood equation to the intermolecular potential of CH4 by addition of all the individual atom interactions and, with N = 4 for carbon and 1 for hydrogen, obtained agreement within 5 per cent for the London energy at the potential minimum. [Pg.74]

COARSE-GRAINED INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIALS DERIVED FROM THE EFFECTIVE FRAGMENT POTENTIAL APPLICATION TO WATER, BENZENE, AND CARBON TETRACHLORIDE... [Pg.197]

The effective potentials described in this chapter, on the other hand, are suited to relatively weak intermolecular quantum effects and require only a slight additional computational overhead - more terms in the potential - relative to routine classical simulations. Therefore, systems with tens of thousands of atoms can readily be modeled. This makes possible the large-scale simulation of biomolecule solvation with... [Pg.418]

Jorgensen and col. extended their TIPS (Transferable Intermolecular Potentials for Simulations) [120- 122] to several organic liquids. More recently, they developed a new generation of "effective" potentials, which received the denomination of OPLS (Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations) [123-127], The standard OPLS philosophy can be summarized in the following three points 1) to keep the form of the potentials simply and easy to evaluate, 2) to include as few new parameters as possible, 3) to produce structural and thermodynamic properties in reasonable accord with experiment. [Pg.157]

This Chapter has outlined several different approaches to the computational determination of solution properties. Two of these address solute-solvent interactions directly, either treating the effects of individual solvent molecules upon the solute explicitly or by means of a reaction field due to a continuum model of the solvent. The other procedures establish correlations between properties of interest and certain features of the solute and/or solvent molecules. There are empirical elements in all of these methods, even the seemingly more rigorous ones, such as the parameters in the molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo intermolecular potentials, Eqs. (16) and (17), or in the continuum model s Gcavitation and Gvdw, Eqs. (40) and (41), etc. [Pg.73]

These results shown in Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate the similarity of the effects of short-range forces on the properties of nonelectrolytes and concentrated electrolytes. One finds both positive and negative deviations from ideality and these effects may be ascribed to the difference between the intermolecular potential energy of attraction of unlike species to the mean of the corresponding potentials for pairs of like molecules. Previous discussion of these systems has focused on the hydration of the positive ion as the dominant effect, but we see in Figure 1 that... [Pg.454]

Another attempt to find solute geometries without explicitly including solvent molecules in the calculations is due to Sinanoglu 245,246). jn a recent paper he proposed a C-potential" effective for molecules in solution, which is derived from the potential surface of a naked solute molecule by inclusion of additive solvation terms obtainable from simple macroscopic properties of the pure liquid solvent. This method is an extension of an earlier formalism applicable to intermolecular potentials between solvated molecules 247,248). [Pg.102]

First, we need to elaborate on the concept of the radius or diameter of the molecules involved in the binding process. Real molecules do not have well-defined boundaries as do geometrical objects such as spheres or cubes. Nevertheless, one can assign to each molecule an effective radius. This assignment depends on the form of the intermolecular potential function between any pair of real particles. [Pg.298]

In principle, it is a simple matter to include solvent water molecules directly in MD simulations, since appropriate intermolecular potential energy functions for water are available (1Z 37,38) one would just surround the solute molecules with a sufficient number of water molecules to approximate a bulk solution. Unfortunately, a "sufficient number of water molecules might be enormous, since many of the effects of aqueous solvation are long range or are due to entropic contributions arising from "structuring of the solvent, which may be cooperative in nature. [Pg.78]

Among the causes of inaccuracy, BSSE (van Duijneveldt et al., 1994) represents a well-known serious inconvenience for any variational computational approach to the problem. This error has a strong effect on the intermolecular potential interaction when weakly interacting systems are investigated. In hydrogen bonded systems, it is common that the BSSE is of the same order of magnitude of the interaction energy involved. [Pg.252]

The SCF-MI BSSE free method does not take into account dispersion forces, connected to electronic intermolecular correlation effects. By using the SCF-MI wave function as a starting point, however, a non orthogonal BSSE free Cl procedure can be developed. This approach was applied to compute intermolecular interactions in water dimer and trimer the resulting ab initio values were used to generate a new NCC-like potential (Niesar et al, 1990). Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water were performed and satisfactory results obtained (Raimondi et al, 1997). [Pg.265]

Surface Pressure, Potential, and Fluidity Characteristics for Various Interactions in Mixed Monolayers. It is possible to distinguish various types of interactions which occur in mixed monolayers by measuring the surface pressure, surface potential, and surface fluidity of the monolayers. Deviation from the additivity rule of molecular areas indicates either an interaction between components or the intermolecular cavity effect in mixed monolayers. [Pg.202]

Hydrocarbon-Hydrocarbon Interaction. Figure 5c shows the general characteristics of mixed monolayers in which hydrocarbon-hydrocarbon interaction occurs—e.g., trimyristin-myristic acid monolayers (16). The average area per molecule shows a deviation, whereas the surface potential per molecule follows the additivity rule. Hydrocarbon-hydrocarbon interaction also increases the cohesive force in the lipid layer and therefore reduces the fluidity of the mixed monolayer. It is evident from Figures 3a and 3c that surface fluidity is the only parameter which distinguishes an intermolecular cavity effect from hydrocarbon-hydrocarbon interaction. [Pg.205]

Employing the additivity approximation, we find dielectric response of a reorienting single dipole (of a water molecule) in an intermolecular potential well. The corresponding complex permittivity jip is found in terms of the hybrid model described in Section IV. The ionic complex permittivity A on is calculated for the above-mentioned types of one-dimensional and spatial motions of the charged particles. The effect of ions is found for low concentrated NaCl and KC1 aqueous solutions in terms of the resulting complex permittivity e p + Ae on. The calculations are made for long (Tjon x) and rather short (xion = x) ionic lifetimes. [Pg.81]

First, we emphasize importance of studies of the effect of temperature T on the wideband spectra of water. A new step could be made in terms of the composite model described in Section VII. We may try to employ the following property discovered in this section. The parameters of the model, pertinent to intermolecular-potential geometry and to cooperative motions of the H-bonded molecules, exhibit only a small dependence on T. Hopefully, this result may facilitate describing or, better, predicting by means of analytical formulas the dependence on T of the wideband spectra of water and of aqueous solutions. [Pg.82]

Recent refinements on the atom-atom potential method include the development of accurate anisotropic model intermolecular potentials from ab initio electron distributions of the molecules. The non-spherical features in these charge distributions reflect features of real molecules such as lone pair and 7t-electron density, and therefore are much more effective at representing key interactions such as hydrogen bonding. [Pg.538]


See other pages where Intermolecular potential, effect is mentioned: [Pg.392]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.321]   


SEARCH



Coarse-Grained Intermolecular Potentials Derived from the Effective Fragment Potential Application to Water, Benzene, and Carbon Tetrachloride

Effective fragment potential intermolecular interactions

Intermolecular effects

Intermolecular potential

Intermolecular potential, effect nonadditivity

Intermolecular potential, effect second virial coefficient

© 2024 chempedia.info