Intermolecular potential, dependence

These are expressed in terms of scalar products between the unit axis system vectors on sites 1 and 2 (on different molecules) and the unit vector 6. from site 1 to 2. The S functions that can have nonzero coefficients in the intermolecular potential depend on the symmetry of the site. This table includes the first few terms that would appear in the expansion of the atom-atom potential for linear molecules. The second set illustrate the types of additional functions that can occur for sites with other than symmetry. These additional terms happen to be those required to describe the anisotropy of the repulsion between the N atom in pyridine (with Zj in the direction of the conventional lone pair on the nitrogen and yj perpendicular to the ring) and the H atom in methanol (with Z2 along the O—H bond and X2 in the COH plane, with C in the direction of positive X2). The important S functions reflect the different symmetries of the two molecules.Note that coefficients of S functions with values of k of opposite sign are always related so that purely real combinations of S functions appear in the intermolecular potential. 

In this case, the intermolecular potential depends only on the separation Rab of the two reagents and takes the very simple form ... 

Realistic intermolecular potentials depend not only on the separation of the two colliding molecules but also on their relative orientation. We will have much to say on the steric aspects of the interaction because molecular recognition and biological selectivity depend on it. 

In a force-displacement curve, the tip and sample surfaces are brought close to one another, and interact via an attractive potential. This potential is governed by intermolecular and surface forces [18] and contains both attractive and repulsive terms. How well the shape of the measured force-displacement curve reproduces the true potential depends largely on the cantilever spring constant and tip radius. If the spring constant is very low (typical), the tip will experience a mechanical instability when the interaction force gradient (dF/dD) exceeds the... 

The empirical potentials for the molecules were obtained on the assumption of single attraction centers. This assumption is probably good for H2, fair for CH4 and N2, and very poor for Cl2. Even for molecules such as CH4 which are relatively spherical in shape, the fact that some atoms are near the outer surface rather than the center has an important effect. The closest interatomic distances are emphasized by the i 6 dependence of the potential. This point has been considered by several authors who worked out examples showing the net intermolecular potential for several models. 

Fig. 7.2. The radial dependence of the anisotropic part of the intermolecular potential (a) variation of height of the librational barrier in any diametrical cross-section of the cage and its rectangular approximation (b) the corresponding rectangular approximation of F(r) separation between the region of libration and that of free rotation inside the cage.

F, is related to the distance dependence of the potential energy, p, by F = —dEp/dr. How does the intermolecular force depend on separation for a typical intermolecular interaction that varies as 1/r6 ... 

In order to be able to evaluate the radial part in all point of space and to adapt the AOM to the SIBFA intermolecular potential, we have introduced an exponential dependence of the radial overlap following a procedure introduced by Woodley et al. [54] ... 

The model presented here develops these ideas and introduces features which make the calculation of mixture properties simple. For a polar fluid with approximately central dispersion forces together with a strong angle dependent electrostatic force we may separate the intermolecular potential into two parts so that the virial coefficients, B, C, D, etc. of the fluid can be written as the sum of two terms. The first terms B°, C°, D°, etc, arise from dispersion forces and may include a contribution arising from the permanent dipole of the molecule. The second terms contain equilibrium constants K2, K, K, etc. which describe the formation... 

Both inter- and intramolecular [5 + 2] cycloaddition modes have been utilized in the synthesis of natural products. Successful intermolecular cycloaddition depends on making an appropriate selection of solvent, supporting electrolyte, oxidation potential, and current density. This is nicely illustrated in Schemes 23 to 25. For example, in methanol the controlled potential oxidation of phenol (101) affords a high yield (87%) of (102), the adduct wherein methanol has intercepted the reactive intermediate [51]. In contrast, a constant current electrolysis conducted in acetonitrile rather than methanol, led to an 83% yield of quinone (103). 

The molecular approach, adopted throughout this book, starts from the statistical mechanical formulation of the problem. The interaction free energies are identified as correlation functions in the probability sense. As such, there is no reason to assume that these correlations are either short-range or additive. The main difference between direct and indirect correlations is that the former depend only on the interactions between the ligands. The latter depend on the maimer in which ligands affect the partition function of the adsorbent molecule (and, in general, of the solvent as well). The argument is essentially the same as that for the difference between the intermolecular potential and the potential of the mean force in liquids. 

First, we need to elaborate on the concept of the radius or diameter of the molecules involved in the binding process. Real molecules do not have well-defined boundaries as do geometrical objects such as spheres or cubes. Nevertheless, one can assign to each molecule an effective radius. This assignment depends on the form of the intermolecular potential function between any pair of real particles. 

To find /[p, u, ] for any given p, t/ , E, (functions of (x) or of (t, x)) we must find the corresponding canonical-like S. In the vestigial force case, pEare related to S only through/(or F), since inter-molecular dependences due to intermolecular potentials are absent at this level of approximation. It is an easy exercise in information theory to show that of all S having the same /, the product... 

It is clear that intermolecular force and induced dipole function arise from the same physical mechanisms, electron exchange and dispersion. Since at the time neither intermolecular potentials nor the overlap-induced dipole moments were known very dependably, direct tests of the assumptions of a proportionality of force and dipole moment were not possible. However, since the assumption was both plausible and successful, it was widely accepted, even after it was made clear that for an explanation of... 

The close coupled scheme is described on pp. 306 through 308. Specifically, the intermolecular potential of H2-H2 is given by an expression like Eq. 6.39 [354, 358] the potential matrix elements are computed according to Eq. 6.45ff. The dipole function is given by Eq. 4.18. Vibration, i.e., the dependences on the H2 vibrational quantum numbers vu will be suppressed here so that the formalism describes the rototranslational band only. For like pairs, the angular part of the wavefunction, Eq. 6.42, must be symmetrized, according to Eq. 6.47. 

All of the transport properties from the Chapman-Enskog theory depend on 2 collision integrals that describe the interactions between molecules. The values of the collision integrals themselves, discussed next, vary depending on the specified intermolecular potential (e.g., a hard-sphere potential or Lennard-Jones potential). However, the forms of the transport coefficients written in terms of the collision integrals, as in Eqs. 12.87 and 12.89, do not depend on the particular interaction potential function. 

For more complex vector-field potentials depending on the relative orientation as well as the separation of the two particles, the corresponding vector expression is F = — V V, where V = (d/dx, d/dy, d/dz) is the gradient operator. Such vectorial aspects of intermolecular forces are obviously important for real molecules of nonspherical shape.]... 

One source of information on intermolecular potentials is gas phase virial coefficient and viscosity data. The usual procedure is to postulate some two-body potential involving 2 or 3 parameters and then to determine these parameters by fitting the experimental data. Unfortunately, this data for carbon monoxide and nitrogen can be adequately represented by spherically symmetric potentials such as the Lennard-Jones (6-12) potential.48 That is, this data is not very sensitive to the orientational-dependent forces between two carbon monoxide or nitrogen molecules. These forces actually exist, however, and are responsible for the behavior of the correlation functions and - In the gas phase, where orientational forces are relatively unimportant, these functions resemble those in Figure 6. On the other hand, in the liquid these functions behave quite differently and resemble those in Figures 7 and 8. 

One of the simplest orientational-dependent potentials that has been used for polar molecules is the Stockmayer potential.48 It consists of a spherically symmetric Lennard-Jones potential plus a term representing the interaction between two point dipoles. This latter term contains the orientational dependence. Carbon monoxide and nitrogen both have permanent quadrupole moments. Therefore, an obvious generalization of Stockmayer potential is a Lennard-Jones potential plus terms involving quadrupole-quadrupole, dipole-dipole interactions. That is, the orientational part of the potential is derived from a multipole expansion of the electrostatic interaction between the charge distributions on two different molecules and only permanent (not induced) multipoles are considered. Further, the expansion is truncated at the quadrupole-quadrupole term. In all of the simulations discussed here, we have used potentials of this type. The components of the intermolecular potentials we considered are given by ... 

The intermolecular potential consists of the sum of Eqs.(176) and (177). This simulation was done for 216 and 512 molecules. However, only the autocorrelation functions from the 512 molecules case are discussed here. The small dipole moment of carbon monoxide makes the orientational part of this potential so weak that molecules rotate essentially freely, despite the fact that this calculation was done at a liquid density. The results for the Stockmayer simulation serve the purpose of providing a framework for contrasting results from more realistic, stronger angular-dependent potentials. 

The intermolecular potential consists of the sum of Eqs. (176), (177), (178), and (179). This simulation was done for 216 and 512 molecules but again only the autocorrelation functions for 512 molecules are discussed here. This potential is the strongest angular dependent potential we considered. The results from this potential indicate that it is slightly stronger than that in real liquid carbon monoxide. For example the mean square torque/TV2), for this simulation is 36 x 10-28 (dyne-cm)2 51 and the experimental value is 21 x 10-28 (dyne-cm)2. If this potential is taken seriously, then it should be pointed out that this small discrepancy in torques could be easily removed by using a smaller quadrupole moment. This would be a well justified step since experimental quadrupole moments for carbon monoxide range from 0.5 x 10-26 to 2.43 x 10-26 esu.49... 

Tanczos35 has extended the theory (for V-T and V-V transfer) to polyatomic molecules, and a detailed comparison with experiment was recently given by Stretton33. Considering each surface atom, energy transfer depends on how the intermolecular potential varies with the oscillation of the atom. In deriving the result for the diatomic molecule from the harmonic-oscillator wave functions, we substituted... 

---