Interferences substances

Interferences—substances that exist simultaneously with ozone and alter the response of the measurement method. 

For soil or solid waste samples, an accurately weighted amount of sample is treated with methanol. A small portion of the methanol extract (usually between 10 and 100 mL, depending on the expected level of analytes concentrations in the sample and the presence of matrix interference substances) is injected into 5 mL of laboratory reagent-grade water taken in the purging vessel which is then purged with an inert gas. Analytes adsorbed over the trap are desorbed by heating and transported to the GC column. 

The ability to detect a substance in the laboratory under clean, controlled conditions is insufhcient to determine whether a detection device is useful. The units need to be tested in the field with common potential interference substances such as engine exhaust, burning fuels, and other burning materials such as common clothing and building materials. Such tests reveal potential problems under real-world operational conditions. Table 3.14 lists potential field interference substances tested. 

Even if a particular detector has CWA detection and identification ability, its usefulness is severely diminished if it shows a similar response to too many other substances. Table 3.15 lists common potential interference substances to be tested. Others can be added as necessary. 

The second phase includes testing the device in various temperature and humidity conditions. Successful completion would then lead to additional testing with potential interference substances both outdoors in the field and in the controlled laboratory environment. Given successful results in the second phase, the testing should then be expanded to cover other agents and other features of the device. 

Since SMBG and POC systems may use different enzymes, mediators, materials, and measurement methods, it comes as no surprise that the claim ranges with regard to operating temperature, humidity, hematocrit, interference substances, and shelf-life are unique to each particular system. When comparing performance between systems, one should keep in mind these characteristics in order to make a clear one-to-one comparison of performance. 

The flame can become unstable if too large an amount of sample is introduced or if the sample contains substances that can interfere with the basic operation of the plasma. For example, water vapor, air, and hydrogen all lead to instability of the plasma flame if their concentrations are too high. 

Inhibitors and retarders differ in the extent to which they interfere with polymerization, and not in their essential activity. An inhibitor is defined as a substance which blocks polymerization completely until it is either removed or consumed. Thus failure to totally eliminate an inhibitor from purified monomer will result in an induction period in which the inhibitor is first converted to an inert form before polymerization can begin. A retarder is less efficient and merely slows down the polymerization process by competing for radicals. 

Polyacrylamide, whether charged or not, can be detected by reactions of the amide group (67,68) however, a number of substances can interfere with the determination. If the molecular weight is high enough, flocculation of a standard slurry of clay or other substrate is a sensitive method for detecting low levels of polyacrylamide (69). Once polymers are adsorbed on a surface, many of these methods caimot be used. One exception is the use of a labeled polymer. 

Because they are weak acids or bases, the iadicators may affect the pH of the sample, especially ia the case of a poorly buffered solution. Variations in the ionic strength or solvent composition, or both, also can produce large uncertainties in pH measurements, presumably caused by changes in the equihbria of the indicator species. Specific chemical reactions also may occur between solutes in the sample and the indicator species to produce appreciable pH errors. Examples of such interferences include binding of the indicator forms by proteins and colloidal substances and direct reaction with sample components, eg, oxidising agents and heavy-metal ions. 

The sense of smell is rapidly fatigued. Fatigue for one odor does not affect the perception of other dissimUar odors, but wUl interfere with the perception of similar odors. Two or more odorous substances may cancel each other out this compensation means that two odorous substances smelled together may be inodorous. 

Ozone can be analyzed by titrimetry, direct and colorimetric spectrometry, amperometry, oxidation—reduction potential (ORP), chemiluminescence, calorimetry, thermal conductivity, and isothermal pressure change on decomposition. The last three methods ate not frequently employed. Proper measurement of ozone in water requites an awareness of its reactivity, instabiUty, volatility, and the potential effect of interfering substances. To eliminate interferences, ozone sometimes is sparged out of solution by using an inert gas for analysis in the gas phase or on reabsorption in a clean solution. Historically, the most common analytical procedure has been the iodometric method in which gaseous ozone is absorbed by aqueous KI. 

Because of the time and expense involved, biological assays are used primarily for research purposes. The first chemical method for assaying L-ascorbic acid was the titration with 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol solution (76). This method is not appHcable in the presence of a variety of interfering substances, eg, reduced metal ions, sulfites, tannins, or colored dyes. This 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol method and other chemical and physiochemical methods are based on the reducing character of L-ascorbic acid (77). Colorimetric reactions with metal ions as weU as other redox systems, eg, potassium hexacyanoferrate(III), methylene blue, chloramine, etc, have been used for the assay, but they are unspecific because of interferences from a large number of reducing substances contained in foods and natural products (78). These methods have been used extensively in fish research (79). A specific photometric method for the assay of vitamin C in biological samples is based on the oxidation of ascorbic acid to dehydroascorbic acid with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (80). In the microfluorometric method, ascorbic acid is oxidized to dehydroascorbic acid in the presence of charcoal. The oxidized form is reacted with o-phenylenediamine to produce a fluorescent compound that is detected with an excitation maximum of ca 350 nm and an emission maximum of ca 430 nm (81). 

Following this procedure urea can be determined with a linear calibration graph from 0.143 p.g-ml To 1.43 p.g-ml and a detection limit of 0.04 p.g-ml based on 3o criterion. Results show precision, as well as a satisfactory analytical recovery. The selectivity of the kinetic method itself is improved due to the great specificity that urease has for urea. There were no significant interferences in urea determination among the various substances tested. Method was applied for the determination of urea in semm. 

The method was validated in accordance to the guidelines of the international conference on harmonization (ICH). Data with respect to accuracy, within- and between run precision, recovery, detection and quantitation limits were reported and found to be within the accepted international criteria. Neither endogeneous substances nor the commonly used dmgs were found to interfere with the retention times of the analytes. Standard solutions of the dmg and quality control preparations at high and low level concentrations were demonstrated to be stable at room temperature and/or -20°C for long and short periods of time. 

Critical factors. The basic cause of incomplete fusion is failure to elevate the temperature of the base metal, or of the previously deposited weld metal, to the melting point. In addition, failure to flux metal oxides or other foreign substances adhering to metal surfaces properly may interfere with proper fusion. 

The important question, then, is not whether a substance is pure but whether a given sample is sufficiently pure for some intended purpose. That is, are the contaminants likely to interfere in the process or measurement that is to be studied. By suitable manipulation it is often possible to reduce levels of impurities to acceptable limits, but absolute purity is an ideal which, no matter how closely approached, can never be attained. A negative physical or chemical test indicates only that the amount of an impurity in a substance lies below a certain sensitivity level no test can demonstrate that a specified impurity is entirely al ent. 

---