Interfacial tension surfactant-polymer flooding

It was observed that the formulations consisting of ethoxylated sulfonates and petroleum sulfonates are relatively insensitive to divalent cations. The results show that a minimum in coalescence rate, interfacial tension, surfactant loss, apparent viscosity and a maximum in oil recovery are observed at the optimal salinity of the system. The flattening rate of an oil drop in a surfactant formulation increases strikingly in the presence of alcohol. It appears that the addition of alcohol promotes the mass transfer of surfactant from the aqueous phase to the interface. The addition of alcohol also promotes the coalescence of oil drops, presumably due to a decrease in the interfacial viscosity. Some novel concepts such as surfactant-polymer incompatibility, injection of an oil bank and demulsification to promote oil recovery have been discussed for surfactant flooding processes. 

Because of the cost and the time factors involved, oil displacement studies are always preceded by certain test tube screening procedures. Specifically, the interfacial tension (IFT) of less than 0.01 dyne/cm is recognized to be the necessary but not the sufficient criterion for selection of a surfactant system. Many investigators (10-15) have shown that ultralow IFT of less than 0.001 dyne/cm can be achieved with less than 0.1 wt. % surfactant solution. Since this low surfactant concentration system is several hundred times more dilute than the ones used in a typical surfactant-polymer flooding process, the economics dictates that the oil displacement by such low surfactant concentration solution should be explored. Moreover, it should be established that the... 

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is a collective term for various methods of increasing oil recoveries that have been developed since about 1970. Up until about 1980, the use of surfactants in EOR was more or less synonymous with "micellar/polymer" flooding, in which surfactants are used to decrease the interfacial tension between "oil" and "water" from 10 dyne/cm to < 0.01 dyne/cm. 

Micellar-polymer flooding and alkali-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding are discussed in terms of emulsion behavior and interfacial properties. Oil entrapment mechanisms are reviewed, followed by the role of capillary number in oil mobilization. Principles of micellar-polymer flooding such as phase behavior, solubilization parameter, salinity requirement diagrams, and process design are used to introduce the ASP process. The improvements in ""classicaV alkaline flooding that have resulted in the ASP process are discussed. The ASP process is then further examined by discussion of surfactant mixing rules, phase behavior, and dynamic interfacial tension. 

Micellar-polymer flooding relies on the injection of a surfactant solution to lower interfacial tension to ultralow levels, on the order of 10 mN/m. The resulting increase in capillary number allows the recovery of residual oil from porous media. The term micellar is used because the concentrations of injected surfactant solutions are always above their critical micelle concentration. That is, they are always above the concentration at which micelles form. 

FIGURE 9.3 Interfacial tensions and solubilization parameters for microemulsions in a system containing a synthetic petroleum sulfonate, an alcohol cosurfactant, a mixture of refined oils, and NaCl brine. (From Reed, R.L. and Healy, R.N., in Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding, Shah, D.O. and Schechter, R.S., Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1977. With permission.)... 

Morgan J.C., Schechter, R.S. and Wade, W.H. (1977) Recent advances in the study of low interfacial tensions. In D.O. Shah and R.S. Schechter (eds), Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding. Academic Press, New York, pp. 101-118. 

Several micellar-polymer flooding models as applied to the EOR are discussed in [237]. It is noted that the co-solvent ordinarily used in this process considerably influences not only the microemulsion stabilisation, but also the removal of impurities in the pores of the medium. The idea of using an alkali in micellar-polymer flooding is discussed in [238] in detail. The alkali effect on the main oil components was studied aromatic hydrocarbons, saturated and unsaturated compounds, light and heavy resin compounds and asphaltenes. It is demonstrated that at pH 12 surfactants formed from resins allow to achieve an interfacial tension value close to zero. For asphaltenes, such results are achieved at pH 14. In the system alkali solution (concentration between 1300 to 9000 ppm)/crude oil at 1 1 volume ratio a zone of spontaneous emulsification appears, which is only possible at ultra-low interfacial tensions. 

The salinity of poljmier solution can influence four major parameters of surfactant-pol)mi r flooding process, namely, interfacial tension, mobility control, surfactant loss and phase behavior. When polymer solution of various salinities are equilibrated with surfactant solution in oil, the formation of lower, middle and upper phase microemulsion has been observed (1) similar to the effect of increasing connate water salinity (2,3). In general, there is an optimal salinity (2) which produces minimum interfacial tension and maximal oil recovery (1,4). On the basis of interfacial tension alone, the salinity of polymer solution should then be designed at or near the optimal salinity of the preceding surfactant formulation. 

Fig. 7. Surfactant concentration in oil and brine, partition coefficient and interfacial tension of effluent fluids of soluble oil flooding in Berea cores containing high concentration of CaCl2. The salinity shock design of polymer solution (i.e. two pol3rmer slugs) was used.

This causes an increase in the microemulsion/brine interfacial tension. In a core flood this may lead to trapping of a microemulsion phase and thus to high surfactant losses. Polymer may also cause a drastic increase in the viscosity of the microemulsion (perhaps a non-equilibrium effect), which is an additional factor hampering the displacement efficiency and thus increasing surfactant loss. 

Cmc values are important in virtually all of the petroleum industry surfactant applications. For example, a number of improved or enhanced oil recovery processes involve the use of surfactants including micellar, alkali/surfactant/polymer (A/S/P) and gas (hydrocarbon, N2, CO2 or steam) flooding. In these processes, surfactant must usually be present at a concentration higher than the cmc because the greatest effect of the surfactant, whether in interfacial tension lowering [30] or in promoting foam stability [3J], is achieved when a significant concentration of micelles is present. The cmc is also of interest because at concentrations... 

Surfactants and polymers are the principal components used in chemical flooding. The surfactant lowers the interfacial tension (IFT) between the reservoir oil and the injected water, while the polymer will create favourable viscosity conditions and good mobility control for the surfactant slug. The oil is then displaced by the viscous forces acting on the oil by the flowing water. For this reason, chemical flooding is also denoted as ... 

Recently, Wellington and Richardson [J5] presented an interesting paper discussing the mechanism of low surfactant concentration enhanced water flood. The surfactant system consisted of alkyl-PO-EO glyceryl sulfonate with small amounts of an ethoxylated cationic surfactant to control phase behavior, interfacial activity, and surfactant loss. The surfactant systems had the ability to reduce their cloud point and interfacial tension when diluted, which was regarded as very useful for an effective flood performance. A surfactant concentration of about 0.4% removed essentially all the residual oil from sand packs in just over f PV with a surfactant loss of less than O.f PV. Mobility control by polymer was strongly required for good displacement and sweep efficiency and to reduce surfactant loss. 

---