Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface particle-solvent

There is an even distribution of solvent particles throughout the solution, even at the surface. There are fewer solvent particles at the gas-liquid interface. Evaporation takes place at this interface. Fewer solvent particles escape into the gas phase and thus the vapor pressure is lower. The higher the concentration of solute particles, the less solvent is at the interface and the lower the vapor pressure. [Pg.178]

However, before we consider the above model, let us review briefly the types of interparticle forces that can result from the presence of polymer chains at particle-solvent interfaces. [Pg.610]

Also briefly mentioned earlier is the fact that the physical properties of the interface of nanoparticles in solution/solvent or electrolytes may lead not only to colloidal behavior but also to particle-particle interaction or particle-solvent interaction. Self-supporting colloid network structures allow for the coexistence of high conductivity with mechanical stability, enabling colloidal gels to be used as electrolytes [76-78]. [Pg.87]

There is not yet a complete and definitive thermodynamic treatment of colloidal systems which includes all the parameters of importance. In particular the problem of interactions between many particles of different sizes, particle solvent interactions in the presence of an adsorbed layer, etc. Several questions remain unresolved, e.g. the question of whether surface potentials or surface charges are modified as particles approach each other [5]. As the primary effect of surfactants on suspension stability is effected through adsorption and the modification of the properties of the interface, rather than on effects on bulk... [Pg.570]

Since Equation 6.33 relates the correlation function of the fluctuating noise F (t) at temperature T with the friction coefficient C associated with the frictional dissipation of energy at the particle-solvent interface, it is referred to as the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. Therefore, the random force and the friction coefficient are not arbitrary but must satisfy Equation 6.33 at a fixed temperature of the system. [Pg.153]

The particle-beam interface (LINC) works by separating unwanted solvent molecules from wanted solute molecules in a liquid stream that has been broken down into droplets. Differential evaporation of solvent leaves a beam of solute molecules that is directed into an ion source. [Pg.80]

The particle-beam interface is used to remove solvent from a liquid stream without, at the same time, removing the solute (or substrate). [Pg.393]

A stream of a liquid solution can be broken up into a spray of fine drops from which, under the action of aligned nozzles (skimmers) and vacuum regions, the solvent is removed to leave a beam of solute molecules, ready for ionization. The collimation of the initial spray into a linearly directed assembly of droplets, which become clusters and then single molecules, gives rise to the term particle beam interface. [Pg.393]

In finite boundary conditions the solute molecule is surrounded by a finite layer of explicit solvent. The missing bulk solvent is modeled by some form of boundary potential at the vacuum/solvent interface. A host of such potentials have been proposed, from the simple spherical half-harmonic potential, which models a hydrophobic container [22], to stochastic boundary conditions [23], which surround the finite system with shells of particles obeying simplified dynamics, and finally to the Beglov and Roux spherical solvent boundary potential [24], which approximates the exact potential of mean force due to the bulk solvent by a superposition of physically motivated tenns. [Pg.100]

The dimensionahty of a system is one of its major features. Despite the fact that our surrounding space is three-dimensional, one can prepare situations that lead to an effective lowered dimension. A typical example regarding colloids is the surface between the solvent and air. One can prepare the particles to be trapped at that interface, so that they float on top of the solvent, building up a two-dimensional (2d) system. Another realization is strong confinement between parallel plates that leads to an effective 2d system. Concerning simulations, it is very convenient to simulate 2d systems, as one has fewer degrees of freedom to deal with e.g., plotting snapshots is easier in 2d than it is in 3d. So, besides their experimental realizations, 2d systems are also important from a conceptual point of view. [Pg.761]

Organic solvents are most commonly used, and encapsulating polymers include ethylcellu-lose, NC, polvvinylidene chloride, polystyrene, polycarbonate, polymethylmethacrylate, polyvinyl acetate and others. Inter facial polymerization produces a polymer such as nylon at the interface between layered solns of two precursor materials such as (in the case of a nylon) a diamine and a diacid (Refs 3 11). If the particle or drop-... [Pg.142]

One of the major problems with this type of interface, not unsurprisingly, is clogging of the pinhole. For this reason, the HPLC system has to be kept scrupulously clean with solvents being passed through narrow filters to remove any solid particles and in-line filters being incorporated to ensure that column material does not find its way into the probe. [Pg.141]

The lattice gas has been used as a model for a variety of physical and chemical systems. Its application to simple mixtures is routinely treated in textbooks on statistical mechanics, so it is natural to use it as a starting point for the modeling of liquid-liquid interfaces. In the simplest case the system contains two kinds of solvent particles that occupy positions on a lattice, and with an appropriate choice of the interaction parameters it separates into two phases. This simple version is mainly of didactical value [1], since molecular dynamics allows the study of much more realistic models of the interface between two pure liquids [2,3]. However, even with the fastest computers available today, molecular dynamics is limited to comparatively small ensembles, too small to contain more than a few ions, so that the space-charge regions cannot be included. In contrast, Monte Carlo simulations for the lattice gas can be performed with 10 to 10 particles, so that modeling of the space charge poses no problem. In addition, analytical methods such as the quasichemical approximation allow the treatment of infinite ensembles. [Pg.165]

All applications of the lattice-gas model to liquid-liquid interfaces have been based upon a three-dimensional, typically simple cubic lattice. Each lattice site is occupied by one of a variety of particles. In the simplest case the system contains two kinds of solvent molecules, and the interactions are restricted to nearest neighbors. If we label the two types of solvents molecules S and Sj, the interaction is specified by a symmetrical 2x2 matrix w, where each element specifies the interaction between two neighboring molecules of type 5, and Sj. Whether the system separates into two phases or forms a homogeneous mixture, depends on the relative strength of the cross-interaction W]2 with respect to the self-inter-action terms w, and W22, which can be expressed through the combination ... [Pg.166]

We first consider the simplest system consisting of two pure, immiscible solvents. Within the lattice-gas model the energetics of the system on a particular lattice are governed by the single parameter w [see Eq. (1)], which determines the structure of the interface and the particle profiles. The results presented in this section are for a simple cubic lattice. [Pg.169]

Monte Carlo simulation shows [8] that at a given instance the interface is rough on a molecular scale (see Fig. 2) this agrees well with results from molecular-dynamics studies performed with more realistic models [2,3]. When the particle densities are averaged parallel to the interface, i.e., over n and m, and over time, one obtains one-dimensional particle profiles/](/) and/2(l) = 1 — /](/) for the two solvents Si and S2, which are conveniently normalized to unity for a lattice that is completely filled with one species. Figure 3 shows two examples for such profiles. Note that the two solvents are to some extent soluble in each other, so that there is always a finite concentration of solvent 1 in the phase... [Pg.169]

The new phenomenon discovered in these experiments consists in different chemical activity revealed by one and the same kind of adsorbed particles in contact with one and the same kind of molecules of the medium, but at different nature of the interface either interface of a solid (ZnO film) with a polar liquid or interface of the solid with vapours of the polar liquid. This difference is caused by the fact that in the case of contact of the film with an adsorbed layer (oxygen, alkyl radicals) with a polar liquid, the solvated ion-radicals O2 chemically interact with molecules of the solvent (see Chapter 3, Section 3.4). In the case where alkyl radicals are adsorbed on ZnO film, one can assume, by analogy with the case of adsorbed oxygen, that in the process of adsorption on ZnO, simple alkyl radicals from metalloorganic complexes of the type... [Pg.264]

Routh and Russel [10] proposed a dimensionless Peclet number to gauge the balance between the two dominant processes controlling the uniformity of drying of a colloidal dispersion layer evaporation of solvent from the air interface, which serves to concentrate particles at the surface, and particle diffusion which serves to equilibrate the concentration across the depth of the layer. The Peclet number, Pe is defined for a film of initial thickness H with an evaporation rate E (units of velocity) as HE/D0, where D0 = kBT/6jT ir- the Stokes-Einstein diffusion coefficient for the particles in the colloid. Here, r is the particle radius, p is the viscosity of the continuous phase, T is the absolute temperature and kB is the Boltzmann constant. When Pe 1, evaporation dominates and particles concentrate near the surface and a skin forms, Figure 2.3.5, lower left. Conversely, when Pe l, diffusion dominates and a more uniform distribution of particles is expected, Figure 2.3.5, upper left. [Pg.97]


See other pages where Interface particle-solvent is mentioned: [Pg.128]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.2654]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.2841]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.1880]    [Pg.2060]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.765]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.997]    [Pg.998]    [Pg.384]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.128 ]




SEARCH



Solvent interfaces

Solvent particles

© 2024 chempedia.info