Finite Systems

Geometry optimizations allowed adsorbates and the central fottr Pt atoms of the first layer to optimize completely while keeping all other Pt-Pt distances fixed to the bulk crystal value of 2.775 A. By doing so, we minimized tmphysical border effects to reproduce the (semi-)irrfinite Pt(lll) surface. This model includes major surface relaxation effects, which were significant for some adsorbates. 

---

The set of microstates of a finite system in quantum statistical mechanics is a finite, discrete denumerable set of quantum states each characterized by an appropriate collection of quantum numbers. In classical statistical mechanics, the set of microstates fonn a continuous (and therefore infinite) set of points in f space (also called phase space). 

For both first-order and continuous phase transitions, finite size shifts the transition and rounds it in some way. The shift for first-order transitions arises, crudely, because the chemical potential, like most other properties, has a finite-size correction p(A)-p(oo) C (l/A). An approximate expression for this was derived by Siepmann et al [134]. Therefore, the line of intersection of two chemical potential surfaces Pj(T,P) and pjj T,P) will shift, in general, by an amount 0 IN). The rounding is expected because the partition fiinction only has singularities (and hence produces discontinuous or divergent properties) in tlie limit i—>oo otherwise, it is analytic, so for finite Vthe discontinuities must be smoothed out in some way. The shift for continuous transitions arises because the transition happens when L for the finite system, but when i oo m the infinite system. The rounding happens for the same reason as it does for first-order phase transitions whatever the nature of the divergence in thennodynamic properties (described, typically, by critical exponents) it will be limited by the finite size of the system. 

Jena P, Khanna S N and Rao B K (eds) 1992 Physics and Chemistry of Finite Systems From Ciusters to Crystais (Boston Kiuwer)... 

Note [240] that the phase in Eq. (13) is gauge independent. Based on the above mentioned heuristic conjecture (but fully justified, to our mind, in the light of our rigorous results), Resta noted that Within a finite system two alternative descriptions [in temis of the squared modulus of the wave function, or in temis of its phase] are equivalent [247]. 

In finite boundary conditions the solute molecule is surrounded by a finite layer of explicit solvent. The missing bulk solvent is modeled by some form of boundary potential at the vacuum/solvent interface. A host of such potentials have been proposed, from the simple spherical half-harmonic potential, which models a hydrophobic container [22], to stochastic boundary conditions [23], which surround the finite system with shells of particles obeying simplified dynamics, and finally to the Beglov and Roux spherical solvent boundary potential [24], which approximates the exact potential of mean force due to the bulk solvent by a superposition of physically motivated tenns. 

In his early survey of computer experiments in materials science , Beeler (1970), in the book chapter already cited, divides such experiments into four categories. One is the Monte Carlo approach. The second is the dynamic approach (today usually named molecular dynamics), in which a finite system of N particles (usually atoms) is treated by setting up 3A equations of motion which are coupled through an assumed two-body potential, and the set of 3A differential equations is then solved numerically on a computer to give the space trajectories and velocities of all particles as function of successive time steps. The third is what Beeler called the variational approach, used to establish equilibrium configurations of atoms in (for instance) a crystal dislocation and also to establish what happens to the atoms when the defect moves each atom is moved in turn, one at a time, in a self-consistent iterative process, until the total energy of the system is minimised. The fourth category of computer experiment is what Beeler called a pattern development... 

All the above scaling relations have one common origin in the behavior of the correlation length of statistical fluctuations, in a finite system [140,141]. Namely, the most specific feature of the second-order transition is the divergence of at the transition point, as is described by Eq. (22). In the finite system, the development of long-wavelength fluctuations is suppressed by the system size limitation can be, at the most, of the same order as L. Taking this into account, we find from Eqs. (22) and (26) that... 

The nodes of Gc represent specific global states, ai, in C, and tliere is a directed link from to aj if and only if = dj. Since there are a finite number of possible states, all finite systems must enter cycles - wherein a fixed subset of configurations is repeatedly visited - in a time t <. We represent these subsets - or attracting... 

Infinite Lattices Although cyclic behavior is certain to occur under even class c3 rules for finite systems, it is a rare occurrence for truly infinite systems cycles occur only with exceptional initial conditions. For a finite sized initial seed, fox example, the pattern either quickly dies or grows progressively larger with time. Most infinite seeds lead only to complex acyclic patterns. Under the special condition that the initial state is periodic with period m , however, the evolution of the infinite system will be the same as that of the finite CA of size N = m-, in this case, cycles of length << 2 can occur. 

Infinite Systems The ultimate fate of infinite systems, in the infinite time limit, is quite different from their finite cousins. In particular, the fate of infinite systems does not depend on the initial density of cr = 1 sites. In the thermodynamic limit, there will always exist, with probability one, some convex cluster large enough to grow without limit. As f -4 oo, the system thus tends to p —r 1 for all nonzero initial densities. What was the critical density for finite systems, pc, now becomes a spinodal point separating an unstable phase for cr = 0 sites for p > pc from a metastable phase in which cr = 0 and cr = 1 sites coexist. For systems in the metastable phase, even the smallest perturbation can induce a cluster that will grow forever. 

As we shall see immediately, this condition, together with the linearity of the neuronal excitations in the threshold condition, allows us to determine a finite system s fate almost entirely) analytically. 

It is important to understand that critical behavior can only exist in the thermodynamic limit that is, only in the limit as the size of the system N —> = oo. Were we to examine the analytical behavior of any observables (internal energy, specific heat, etc) for a finite system, we would generally find no evidence of any phase transitions. Since, on physical grounds, we expect the free energy to be proportional to the size of the system, we can compute the free energy per site f H, T) (compare to equation 7.3)... 

Note that the critical behavior just described holds true strictly only in the thermodynamic limit i.c. only when the number of sites N oo. The above results are in fact obtained by extrapolating from finite system calculations. Kinzel... 

In the case of a finite system described by a finite basis set the spectrum of G E) and WIE) are discrete andG (E) has isolated real poles (31,99). As a result, the solution for the propagator consists in the diagonalization of the WfE) matrix... 

Figure 2.9.3 shows typical maps [31] recorded with proton spin density diffusometry in a model object fabricated based on a computer generated percolation cluster (for descriptions of the so-called percolation theory see Refs. [6, 32, 33]).The pore space model is a two-dimensional site percolation cluster sites on a square lattice were occupied with a probability p (also called porosity ). Neighboring occupied sites are thought to be connected by a pore. With increasing p, clusters of neighboring occupied sites, that is pore networks, begin to form. At a critical probability pc, the so-called percolation threshold, an infinite cluster appears. On a finite system, the infinite cluster connects opposite sides of the lattice, so that transport across the pore network becomes possible. For two-dimensional site percolation clusters on a square lattice, pc was numerically found to be 0.592746 [6]. 

P is an empirical parameter that was determined to 0.0042 by a least-squares fit to the exactly known exchange energies of the rare gas atoms He through Rn. In addition to the sum rules, this functional was designed to recover the exchange energy density asymptotically far from a finite system. 

Weighted-Density Exchange and Local-Density Coulomb Correlation Energy Functionals for Finite Systems—Applications to Atoms. Phys. Rev. A 48, 4197. 

Fig. 2.2. Average electrostatic potential mc at the position of the methane-like Lennard-Jones particle Me as a function of its charge q. mc contains corrections for the finite system size. Results are shown from Monte Carlo simulations using Ewald summation with N = 256 (plus) and N = 128 (cross) as well as GRF calculations with N = 256 water molecules (square). Statistical errors are smaller than the size of the symbols. Also included are linear tits to the data with q < 0 and q > 0 (solid lines). The fit to the tanh-weighted model of two Gaussian distributions is shown with a dashed line. Reproduced with permission of the American Chemical Society...

For periodic systems special care must be taken, because it is not possible to define properly a vector potential for a constant magnetic field in an infinite system. In finite systems, however, this problem does not exist, and a given magnetic field B can be described by a vector potential ... 

Blaizot, J.-P. and Ripka, G. Quantum theory of finite systems, The MIT Press, Cambridge,Massachusetts, 1986... 

By differentiating with respect to the number of electrons, the preceding equations presuppose that one can compute the energy (Equation 18.5) and the density (Equation 18.7) for systems with noninteger numbers of electrons. But how Every real and finite system has an integer number of electrons. 

---