Interface barrier

Note that in the framework of purely diffusional considerations any diffusing atoms are assumed to be available for any growing compound layer. In other words, the existence of any interface barriers to prevent diffusion of appropriate atoms is not recognised. From this viewpoint, it would be more logical to compare the diffusion coefficients of aluminium, as the more mobile component, in all the titanium aluminides. In such a case, the absence of most aluminide layers becomes quite unexplainable. It is highly unlikely that the diffusion coefficients of aluminium in different titanium aluminides are so different as to exclude the formation, say, of the TiAl2 layer. 

In general, a large serial resistance and an over-small parallel resistance (shunt) tend to reduce the FF. Strategies for reducing the serial resistivity by improving the quality of the Ohmic contact will be discussed. The insertion of very thin polar layers like LiF have been shown to reduce the interface barrier at the cathode in bulk heterojunction solar cells, if they are evaporated between the photoactive material and an A1 electrode [93,94]. 

There is another model of interface barriers, due to Mott, which is rarely used in semiconductors but might be relevant to CPs in some cases since it assumes that the depletion of free carriers in the semiconductor surface region is due to the absence of acceptors (or donors) in that region [236]. In a CP this would correspond to chemical compensation or destruction of the dopants unintentionally present, which give the CP its conductivity. 

The mechanism of charge transfer across the interface barrier layer is different for lowly doped and heavily doped p-type silicon. For lowly p-type doped silicon the process is by thermal emission of holes to go over the barrier layer while it is by Zener tunneling for heavily doped materials [11, 37]. For ra-Si the conduction band processes depend on doping density and on illumination intensity. For heavily... 

Figure I. (a) Experimental arrangement for the measurement of freezing potentials (10 K, resistor not in circuit) and currents (10 K. resistor shunting the phases), V = electrometer C = recorder, (b) Electric analog of the system in the shunt case, Rb = interface barrier resistance = external shunt resistance Rj = ice resistance Ri = solution resistance Rm = ice metal interface resistance c = interface charge separation...

However, in the real MO interface, a common vacuum level is not achieved in most cases. An interface dipole layer can be formed between the metal and the organic. As a result, the vacuum level becomes discontinuous at the interface. So there will be an abrupt change (A) right across the interface, which was observed experimentally [34,35]. As shown in Figure 3.3b, the interface barriers have to be modified ... 

Note that the sign of A is negative in Figure 6.1b. The equations obviously depict that the interface barrier heights for holes and electrons would be underestimated or overestimated if the A is not considered. However, it is difficult to quantitatively predict the magnitude of the A and thereby the interface barrier heights from the well-known bulk values. 

The electronegativity model has been used successfully on metal/organic semiconductor interfaces, and shown to give a satisfactory description of the interface barrier formation. As electronegativity is defined only for elements it is of interest to investigate if the electronegativity model can be extended to compound electrodes such as indium tin oxide (ITO), which... 

As shown in Fig. 7.2B, pA (fpc) is the Fermi level of the metal anode (cathode). There are no electrons occupied over the Fermi level at room temperature, and the work function (W) of the metal electrode can be defined as the energy difference between vacuum level and Fermi level. While the electron affinity ( )0 and the ionization energy (Jp) are defined as the energy difference between LUMO or HOMO of organic semiconductor and vacuum level, respectively. Usually the Fermi level of the metal electrode is higher than HOMO and lower than LUMO, which leading to interface barrier (O) of anode = Jp—and cathode... 

When the ions are at the fluid/air interface they form an electric double layer [3]. Here they apply an electrostatic force on the interface, which opposes the surface tension forces and deforms the drop. If a large enough electric field is applied, these ions can actually overcome the surface tension forces and break through the liquid/ air interface barrier [4]. This is essentially what happens in an electrospray (ES), also called electrohydrodynamic spray (EHD). This phenomenon is illustrated in Fig. 32.2. 

V. J. Rao, V. S. Kulkami, Interface Barrier Height in n-GaAs(100)/Langmuir-Blodgett Film Structures, Tlzm Solid Films 1991, 198, 357-362. 

Limited perhaps by the electron tunneling distance [4] below which electrons can penetrate the metal-oxide-interface barrier without first acquiring the usual activation energy. 

Powell, R. (1970) Interface barrier energy determination from voltage... 

The difference between optical and electrochemical bandgaps arises for a number of possible reasons the exciton binding energy of the substrate [145], an interface barrier for charge injection [146, 147], conformational changes upon doping, external influence of ions/solvent in the electrochemical cell. 

Aging of MFC films results in further permeability reductions. This is due to the enhanced matrix nucleation occurring at the PE/PET interface. Barrier improvements are consistently 6 to 8 times greater for MFCs than for plain films. 

The previous model erases aU electrical fields and interfacial barriers in the mesostructure, which is viewed in effect as a homogeneous medium. However, in semiconductor mesostructures, filled with an HTM, one can also allow for the presence of an electrical field and semiconductor barrier at the internal interface ETM/HTM. The prevalence of one approach or the other, i.e., a macrohomogeneous model that only contemplates the Fermi level or the explicit presence of internal interface barriers, depends on doping densities, size of semiconductor particles or wires, and Debye length both in the semiconductor nanostructure and in the HTM [95-97]. 

Nonlinear current-voltage (I-V) characteristics can be obtained with a silicon nitride (SiNx) layer. Figure 3 shows across sectional view of a system which consists of met-al/off-stoichiometric-SiNx/ITO formed on a glass substrate. The transparent electrode (ITO) film is deposited on the lower glass and photo-etched to form a separate pixel electrode. Afterwards, a SiN layer is deposited by RF-plasma CVD (chemical vapor deposition). I-V characteristics for a conventional TFD are not completely polarity-symmetric due to differences between the upper and lower SiN interface barriers. In order to cancel these differences and to obtain symmetric I-V characteristics, the... 

---