Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Target probe interaction

Arrays have been produced on filter supports, in microtiter plate wells and on glass slides coated and modified with one-, two- or 3-dimensional surface architectures as shown schematically in Figure 813 19. Glass offers a number of practical advantages, such as mechanical stability and low autofluorescence. Due to the non-porous character of glass chips, the volume of the hybridization solution can be kept to a minimum and probe-target interaction is not limited by diffusion into pores. However, three-... [Pg.486]

Optimal bromination of a DNA probe is in the range of 30-35 bases per 1,000 bases, a level which can be controlled by the amount of N-bromosuccinimide added. Over labeling can prevent specific interactions with target DNA, even if the point of initial modification is not a hydrogen bonding site. [Pg.977]

Sonicated and denatured salmon sperm DNA (or other anionic maCTomolecules) may be used to reduce nonspecific probe interaction and electrostatic forces. The latter also may be reduced with dextran sulfate. High-stringency (low-sodium) hybridization ensures that complete complementarity will characterize the probe-target hybrid. [Pg.360]

The in vitro screening approach measures direct mechanistic links between chemical interactions with key targets and the downstream effects of perturbing the related molecular pathways. By using current knowledge ofthe molecular basis of diseases, one can enrich an assay set to probe targets in key disease-related pathways and thereby develop predictive models in a more hypothesis-driven manner. [Pg.32]

For the chemometric analysis, the three-dimensional MIFs obtained from GRID are rearranged as one-dimensional vectors. In the GRID/PGA approach [6], one such vector is obtained for each MIF, and the vectors are used to build a two-dimensional X matrix, in which the rows are the probe-target interactions (the objects) and each column contains the variables that describe energetically these interactions at a given grid point. The process used to obtain the X matrix is illustrated in Fig. 3.1. [Pg.50]

A careful pretreatment is necessary to focus on the relevant variables. Often variables with low absolute values (<0.01 kcal moT ) and those with low standard deviations (<0.02-0.03kcal mol" ) are removed in order to eliminate noise. Autoscaling is not recommended, since all the data comes from the same source (GRID probe-target interaction energies) and all the data are expressed in the same units (kcalmof ). Thus, autoscaling might introduce noise in the model. [Pg.50]

The X data matrix which contains all information describing the probe-target interactions can be analyzed by PCA [29, 30]. PCA is a multivariate projection method which allows one to extract the systematic information which is contained in the data matrix and to present it in a simplified form. The original number of variables is reduced to a few factors called principal components (PCs). The result of such an analysis can then be visualized by means of two informative plots which allow a straightforward interpretation of the problem. In this way, PCA provides an understanding of similarities and dissimilarities between the different protein binding sites with respect to their interaction with potential ligands. [Pg.51]

The score matrix gives a simplified picture of the objects (probe-target interactions), represented by only a few, uncorrelated new variables (the PCs). Score plots, i.e. plots of the score vectors against each other, are a summary of the relationships between the objects and reveal the essential data patterns of the objects. Thus, objects which behave similarly have similar scores and are close in the score plot. In our context, score plots can be used to identify clusters of objects according to the different kind of targets (macromolecules) and probes (ligand chemical groups) involved. [Pg.52]

The main difference between the capture and the sandwich assays is how the label probe-target complex is immobilized on a solid phase. In capture assays, hybridization with the immobilized capture probe determines the kinetics and specificity/detectability/sensitivity characteristics of the assay. In sandwich assays, an immobilized molecule, which is not a nucleic acid (e.g., streptavidin, antibodies), serves to capture the hapten probe-target-label probe ternary complex (thus both probes need to be modified). The affinity matrix-hapten interaction thus determines the kinetics (usually 3-10 times faster than solid phase hybridization), the sensitivity and detectability... [Pg.165]

A control band showing that the sequence on the liposomes is capable of hybridizing and that the liposomes themselves are visible may be added. For simplicity of membrane preparation, we typically do not include this control band. However, if desired, prepare an equivalent volume of an unmodified probe that is complementary to the sequence on the liposomes for deposition as a control zone. Be sure that this sequence shares little complementarity with the capture probe sequence used at the capture zone. Otherwise, excess probes that are released during the blocking step can hybridize to the opposite zone and reduce the amount of probe available for interaction with target. [Pg.203]

The specificity and affinity of interactions between target molecules bound to the microarray substrate and probe molecules in solution largely determine the quality of microarray assays. The complementary base hybridization is the most efficient and reproducible target-probe interactions used in DNA microarray analysis. [Pg.530]

Grunbeck, A., Sakmar, T. P. (2013). Probing G protein-coupled receptor—Ligand interactions with targeted photoactivatable cross-hnkers. Biochemistry, 52(48), 8625—8632. http //dx.doi.Org/10.1021/bi401300y. [Pg.418]

Small molecule chemical probe Probes targeting a known interaction... [Pg.26]


See other pages where Target probe interaction is mentioned: [Pg.527]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.1430]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.5700]    [Pg.2061]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.408]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 , Pg.45 , Pg.242 ]




SEARCH



Interactance probe

Probe interactions

Target-probe hybridization interactions

Target-targeter interaction

Target—probe-enzyme interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info