Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Incremental development model

The development methodology establishes detailed discrete work products, by phases and events, and by associated activities. The computer systems development approach must be consistent with the selected SLC the most common development methodologies are the Waterfall Model, the Incremental Development Model, the Evolutionary Model, the Object Oriented approach, and the Spiral Model. Sample SLC activities and work products are detailed in Appendix E. [Pg.12]

See Concurrent Development Model, Incremental Development Model, Spiral Development Model, and System Life-Cycle Model for additional information. [Pg.126]

The most common development methodologies are the Waterfall Model, Incremental Development, Evolutionary Model, Object Oriented, and Spiral Model. [Pg.708]

Becker, S., Haase, T., Westfechtel, B. Model-based a-posteriori integration of engineering tools for incremental development processes. Software and Systems Modeling 4(2), 123-140 (2005)... [Pg.787]

Becker, S., Westfechtel, B. Uml-based definition of integration models for incremental development processes in chemical engineering. In Proceedings of the 7 International Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology (IDPT 2003), Austin, Texas, USA, SDPS (2003)... [Pg.787]

Incremental process model addresses the delivery gap. It produces the product in increments that implement the needed functionality in increments. Increments may be delivered to the customer as they are developed this is called evolutionary, or incremental, delivery. [Pg.298]

Section 5.3.1 has shown that parameter sensitivities of ARR residuals may be obtained from an incremental bond graph. The latter bond graph can be systematically developed from an initial bond graph with nominal parameters by replacing elements with parameters to be estimated by their incremental component model. Inputs into the incBG are variations of the parameters to be estimated multiplied by a power variable of the initial BG. Outputs may be parameter variations of ARR residuals. They are a weighted sum of the parameter variations and the weighting factors are just the residual sensitivity functions. [Pg.140]

In 1998, DSTO supported the Project Definition Study (PDS) (Phase 2) for Land 125 (Hobbs and Chalmers, 2003) to further refine the project scope and to develop the supporting data to allow higher-level cost-benefit tradeoffs to be made. The DSTO recommendation in 1998 was not to acquire an Integrated Soldier System, as the technology was not considered sufficiently advanced. The report proposed a preferred path for SCS development as an incremental development involving a number of model-test-model cycles in order to fully understand the requirements for an optimised soldier combat system prior to Phase 3 of the project. [Pg.23]

It should be emphasized that it is usually necessary to develop the data collection specification on an incremental basis and to utilize feedback from the system to modify the initial model relating causal factors to error types. This dynamic approach provides the best answer to the problem that no predefined error model will be applicable to every situation. [Pg.265]

Clearly, the extent of exotherm-generated temperature overshoot predicted by the Chiao and finite element models differs substantially. The finite element results were not markedly changed by refining the mesh size or the time increments, so the difference appears to be inherent in the numerical algorithms used. Such comparison is useful in further development of the codes, as it provides a means of pinpointing those model parameters or algorithms which underlie the numerical predictions. These points will be explored more fully in future work. [Pg.280]

Sensitivity to step size was thought to be likely due to an unnecessary simplification in the original development of the model. The simplification was to consider initiator concentration constant over a small time increment. When instead the initiator was allowed to vary according to the usual first order decomposition path an analytical solution for the variation of polymer concentration could still readily be obtained and was as follows ... [Pg.512]


See other pages where Incremental development model is mentioned: [Pg.214]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.1611]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.496]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.214 ]




SEARCH



Incremental

Incremental development

Incrementalism

Increments

Model developed

Model incremental

© 2024 chempedia.info