Impurity analysis detection limit

Volatile impurities, eg, F2, HF, CIF, and CI2, in halogen fluoride compounds are most easily deterrnined by gas chromatography (109—111). The use of Ftoroplast adsorbents to determine certain volatile impurities to a detection limit of 0.01% has been described (112—114). Free halogen and haHde concentrations can be deterrnined by wet chemical analysis of hydrolyzed halogen fluoride compounds. 

In summary, CL can provide contactless and nondestructive analysis of a wide range of electronic properties of a variety of luminescent materials. Spatial resolution of less than 1 pm in the CL-SEM mode and detection limits of impurity concentrations down to 10 at/cm can be attained. CL depth profiling can be performed by varying the range of electron penetration that depends on the electron-beam energy the excitation depth can be varied from about 10 nm to several pm for electron-beam energies ranging between about 1 keV and 40 keV. 

The term direct TXRF refers to surface impurity analysis with no surface preparation, as described above, achieving detection Umits of 10 °—10 cm for heavy-metal atoms on the silicon surface. The increasit complexity of integrated circuits fabricated from silicon wafers will demand even greater surfrce purity in the future, with accordingly better detection limits in analytical techniques. Detection limits of less than 10 cm can be achieved, for example, for Fe, using a preconcentration technique known as Vapor Phase Decomposition (VPD). 

Atomic absorption spectroscopy of VPD solutions (VPD-AAS) and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) offer similar detection limits for metallic impurities with silicon substrates. The main advantage of TXRF, compared to VPD-AAS, is its multielement capability AAS is a sequential technique that requires a specific lamp to detect each element. Furthermore, the problem of blank values is of little importance with TXRF because no handling of the analytical solution is involved. On the other hand, adequately sensitive detection of sodium is possible only by using VPD-AAS. INAA is basically a bulk analysis technique, while TXRF is sensitive only to the surface. In addition, TXRF is fast, with an typical analysis time of 1000 s turn-around times for INAA are on the order of weeks. Gallium arsenide surfaces can be analyzed neither by AAS nor by INAA. 

The detection of impurities or surface layers (e.g., oxides) on thick specimens is a special situation. Although the X-ray production and absorption assumptions used for thin specimens apply, the X-ray spectra are complicated by the background and characteristic X rays generated in the thick specimen. Consequently, the absolute detection limits are not as good as those given above for thin specimens. However, the detection limits compare very favorably with other surface analysis techniques, and the results can be quantified easily. To date there has not been any systematic study of the detection limits for elements on surfaces however, representative studies have shown that detectable surface concentrations for carbon and... 

It is important to emphasize that GDMS provides an essentially complete elemental impurity survey to very low detection limits in a timely, cost effective manner. Although this level of analysis requires long signal integration times, the Ga measurement requires only a few hours to obtain an accurate, confirmed analysis to 7N levels. Except for the presence of rather high In in the Ga, the remaining impurities are at sub ppmw levels. Detection limits in the Ga are clearly adequate for 7N qualification. 

Figure 4.41. Trend analysis over 12 batches of a bulk chemical. The sieve analysis shows that over time crystals larger than 250 /urn were reduced from a weight contribution in the range of a few percent of the total to about 1% in favor of smaller sizes. Impurity C appears to follow the trend given by the lead compound for the competing side reaction 1. The very low moisture found for sample 3 could be due to a laboratory error because during drying one would expect ethanol to be driven off before water. Methanol is always below the detection limit.

The principal advantages of SIMS, in both its static and dynamic forms, are its surface sensitivity and its very low detection limits for impurities. Only a very small proportion of the detected ions come from the second or lower layers of the materials being analysed. With regard to quantitative analysis, Yickerman (in Yickerman,... 

For confirmatory assay, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is becoming more frequently used in the analysis of OTC owing to its high sensitivity and ability. Electrospray ionization (ESI) [55-57] and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) [41] methods combined with tandem mass spectrometry are favored because of their higher sensitivity and better reproducibility. Hamscher et al. [58] developed a method for the determination of persistent TC residues in soil fertilized with manure by HPLC tandem mass spectrometry, MS-MS, and confirmation by MS-MS-MS. Zhu et al. [59] developed an LC-tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of common tetracyclines in water. The detection limit for oxytetracycline was 0.21 pg/L. Lykkeberg et al. [60] used LC-MS/MS for determination of oxytetracycline and its impurities EOTC, TC, ETC, ADOTC, oc-AOTC, and /i-AOTC. 

There are many examples of ELIS As used for detecting host cell impurities in the literature. Pauly et al.12 developed an ELISA to detect impurities in erythropoietin that had a detection limit of around 0.05 ng/ml. SDS polyacrylamide gel and Western blot analysis were used to confirm the spectrum of proteins detected and to demonstrate the specificity of the antibody preparation. Anicetti et al.14 describe an assay for the detection of E. coli proteins in recombinant DNA-derived human growth hormone. Whitmire and Eaton15 report on an immuno-ligand assay for quantitation of process-specific E. coli host cell contaminant proteins in a recombinant bovine somatotropin. 

NMR is a remarkably flexible technique that can be effectively used to address many analytical issues in the development of biopharmaceutical products. Although it is already more than 50 years old, NMR is still underutilized in the biopharmaceutical industry for solving process-related analytical problems. In this chapter, we have described many simple and useful NMR applications for biopharmaceutical process development and validation. In particular, quantitative NMR analysis is perhaps the most important application. It is suitable for quantitating small organic molecules with a detection limit of 1 to 10 p.g/ml. In general, only simple one-dimensional NMR experiments are required for quantitative analysis. The other important application of NMR in biopharmaceutical development is the structural characterization of molecules that are product related (e.g., carbohydrates and peptide fragments) or process related (e.g., impurities and buffer components). However, structural studies typically require sophisticated multidimensional NMR experiments. 

Actinide metal samples are characterized by chemical and structure analysis. Multielement analysis by spark source mass spectrometry (SSMS) or inductively coupled argon plasma (ICAP) emission spectroscopy have lowered the detection limit for metallic impurities by 10 within the last two decades. The analysis of O, N, H by vacuum fusion requires large sample, but does not distinguish between bulk and surface of the material. Advanced techniques for surface analysis are being adapted for investigation of radioactive samples (Fig. 11) ... 

---