Personnel implementation

A well-defined and implemented personnel intervention policy, including intervention recording. 

Change Approval - All organizational (MOOC) changes shall be approved by the facility manager or documented delegate prior to implementation. Personnel changes may be approved by the supervisor and this approval can happen after the change effective date. 

We have implemented several edge and region segmentation algorithms and image enhancement techniques on an IBM personnel computer, in C++ language. 

NDT has a very important formal status. Requirements for performanee of NDT, acceptance criteria and requirements for personnel qualification are implemented in codes and standards. The NDT procedure is part of the contract. During the many years that NDT methods have been used in industry a well-established situation has evolved, enabling the use of NDT for the evaluation of welds against Good Workmanship Criteria on a routine basis, thus maintaining workmanship standards and minimising the risks of component failure. 

The National system of accreditation gives much attention to the training and qualification of NDT personnel. Significant subjective component, such as training and qualification of personnel, is present in NDT implementation and assessment of its results, thus all specialists carrying out NDT must be certified in compliance with CTBEH 473. 

Disaster Planning. Plant managers should recogni2e the possibiHty of natural and industrial emergencies and should oversee formulation of a plan of action in case of disaster. The plan should be weU documented and be made known to all personnel critical to its implementation. Practice fire and explosion drills should be carried out to make sure that all personnel, ie, employees, visitors, constmction workers, contractors, vendors, etc, are accounted for, and that the participants know what to do in a major emergency. 

Cascade control strategies are among the most popular and usehil process control strategies. Modem control systems have made thek implementation and operation both easier from the standpoint of operations personnel, and cost effective as they are implemented in software rather than hardwiring the connections. 

Implementation of process interlocks within process control systems is perfectly acceptable. Furthermore, it is also permissible (and probably advisable) that responsible operations personnel be authorized to bypass or ignore a process. Safety interlocks must be implemented within the separate safety interlock system. Bypassing or ignoring safety interlocks by operations personnel is simply not permitted. When this is necessary for ac tions such as verifying that the interlock continues to be func tional, such situations must be infrequent and incorporated into the design of the interlock. 

If procedures were revised, were the revisions reviewed and Personnel informed of the changes prior to implementation ... 

Hazard and operability study prior to implementation (repeat when in use) Updating of all operating instructions, notices, procedures Removal/isolation of obsolete plant/lines Control of changes in personnel (see training)... 

The audit team found that at Sites B and H, safety and health personnel had suflfieient authority in most eases to thoroughly implement the safety and health plans. To faeilitate safety and health eom-plianee, anyone who entered Site H, ineluding delivery personnel, was required to view a brief video that summarized the site history and remediation operations, identified the hazardous substanees monitored on site, and deseribed site evaeuation proeedures. Site B s SSAHP did not mention speeifie subeontraetors and their roles and responsibilities however, it did indieate that the prime eontraetor had oversight responsibility for all safety and health aetivities and the authority to diseontinue or modify site operations when unsafe eonditions were deteeted. 

Other sites provided general provisions for acceptable training programs but lacked the site-specific detail necessary to implement a successful program. Eor example, the contractor s plan at Site E contained a requirement that all project field personnel receive training in accordance with applicable OSHA standards, including a minimum of 40 hours of hazardous waste operations training. The plan did not contain,... 

Only personnel who have completed the training prescribed by host organization health and safety personnel shall be allowed to work on host organization projects. Some projects may require contractor certification or special training as specified in the implementing purchase order. 

Is the design team staffed with personnel possessing the necessary qualification to implement the requirements of ISO/TS 16949 ... 

The standard requires all design changes to be reviewed and approved bp authorized personnel before their implementation (including changes to proprietary designs). The standard also requires the supplier to address the impact of a design change on the systems in which the product is used, the customer assembly process, and other related products and systems. 

The standard requires all design modifications reviewed and approved bp authorized personnel before their implementation (including changes to proprietary designs). 

This requirement addresses the implementation of the improvement plan prepared to deal with problems requiring preventive action. The improvement plan should have defined who is to take the preventive action and also the extent of the action to be taken that is, only in the area where the trend was detected or over a much wider area. In initiating the action (see also Part 2 Chapter 1 under Personnel with organizational freedom) you need to carry it out in an organized manner, as follows ... 

Unless your customer has specified packaging requirements, there are several national standards that can be used to select the appropriate packaging, marking, and preservation requirements for your products. Your procedures should make provision for the selection to be made by qualified personnel at the planning stage and for the requirements thus selected to be specified in the packing instructions to ensure their implementation. 

Implementation audits could be carried out by trained line personnel supervised by an experienced quality auditor. 

To develop a safe design, it is necessary to first design and specify all equipment and systems in accordance with applicable codes and standards. Once the system is designed, a process safety shutdown system is specified to assure that potential hazards that can be detected by measuring process upsets are detected, and that appropriate safety actions (normally an automatic shutdown) are initiated. A hazards analysis is then normally undertaken to identify and mitigate potential hazards that could lead to fire, explosion, pollution, or injury to personnel and that cannot be detected as process upsets. Finally, a system of safety management is implemented to assure the system is operated and maintained in a safe manner by personnel who have received adequate training. 

At this point, it would be reasonable to consider— for planning purposes— the following broad parameters 120 staff-months, spread among a team including corporate, division, and facility personnel over an 18-month period, at the end of which we can expect to have a PSM system that has been carefully thought out and fully tested, ready for implementation throughout the company. 

For example, a facility manager may be confident that PSM policies and procedures are in place, but line personnel may indicate in the same survey that they are unaware of them—suggesting a gap that your implementation plan should address. 

---