Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Impact assessment method

Bovea MD, Gallardo A (2006) The influence of impact assessment methods on materials selection for eco-design. Mater Des 27(3) 209-215... [Pg.21]

Cooper, J. A. Watson, J. G., Jr. "Review of Air Particulate Source Impact Assessment Methods", This Symposium. [Pg.72]

Presented as an overview of the State of Oregon s unique approach to particulate control strategy development, this review was prepared to provide those responsible for airshed management with new information on source impact assessment methods. (This material is available in the form of an audio-visual program suitable for presentation before public, regulatory or private Interest groups). [Pg.107]

Seller, L. E. Canter, L. W. "Summary of Selected Ground Water Quality Impact Assessment Methods" NCGWR Report No. 80-3, National Center for Ground Water Research Norman, Oklahoma, 1980, pp. 1-142. [Pg.160]

There is really very little consistency across these environmental impact assessment methods except that the Swedish and Dutch systems rate cadmium the battery metal with the most adverse effects, while the Tellus and Ecoscarcity Methods rate mercury the most adverse battery metal. Zinc, manganese, nickel and even lead have relatively low effects except in the U.S. EPA system, which however is the one system which is most closely tied to actual quantitative assessments of enviromnental and human health toxicological end points. What is very surprising is the relatively low impact values for mercury in the Swedish and Dutch schemes given the general worldwide concern for mercury. [Pg.25]

Environmental impact assessment methods for textiles and clothing... [Pg.149]

Goedkoop, M.J., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Stmijs, J., VanZebn, R., 2008. ReCiPe 2008, A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint LeveL first ed. Report I Characterisation 6 January 2009. Retrieved from http //www.lda-recipe.net. [Pg.189]

Brent, A.C., Hietkamp, S., 2003. Comparative evaluation of bfe cycle impact assessment methods with a South African case study. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8, 27-38. [Pg.250]

To cover a wider spectrum of potential environmental impacts, several indicators from different impact assessment methods were employed, as implemented in Simapro v8.0.2 global warming potential over 100 years (GWPioo) (IPCC, 2006), renewable and nonrenewable cumulative energy demand (CED) [v 1.08] (Hischier et al., 2010), ecotoxicity [USEtox vl.03] (Rosenbaum et al., 2008), agricultural land occupation (ALO) and freshwater eutrophication (EE) [ReCIPe v.1.09] (Goedkoop et al., 2013). [Pg.259]

Hischier, R., Weidema, B., Althaus, H., Bauer, C., Doka, G., Dones, R., Frischknecht, R., HeUweg, S., Humbert, S., Jungbluth, N., Kollner, T., Loerincik, Y., Margni, M., Nemecek, T., 2010. Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Ecoinvent Report No. 3. St. GaUen. http //www.ecoinvent.org/support/old-doc/rep/ (accessed October 2014). [Pg.272]

In this smdy the Simapro software and the ReCiPe endpoint impact assessment model were used, but other software (e.g. GaBi) and other impact assessment methods (e.g, CML 2002 Impact 2002+) are suitable for composites. [Pg.311]

Hertwich, E.G., Pease, W.S., McKone, T.E., 1998. Evaluating toxic impact assessment methods what works best Environmental Science and Technology 32, A138—A144. [Pg.320]

Impact categories and impact assessment method 3.3.1 Functional Unit... [Pg.420]

Goedkoop MJ, De Schryver A (2009) Fossil resoiuce. Chapter 13. In Goedkoop M, Heijimgs R, Huijbregts MAJ, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008 a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Report I characterisation, 1st edn. Retrieved from http //www.lcia-recipe.net (accessed 20 August 2013)... [Pg.468]

Life-cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling, http //lime3.jimdo.com/... [Pg.248]

Table 11.1 Classification of Environmental Impact Assessment Methods... Table 11.1 Classification of Environmental Impact Assessment Methods...
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, et al. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.0. Dubendorf Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories 2007. [Pg.272]

This study used the PROSUITE endpoint impact assessment method in which all impacts are categorized into five main impacts, including impact on human health, impact on social being, impact on prosperity, impact on natural environment, and impact on exhaustible resources. These impacts are then combined with normalization and weighting to obtain a single sustainability score (see the section Methodologies for Assessing Life Cycle Sustainability). [Pg.339]


See other pages where Impact assessment method is mentioned: [Pg.49]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.72]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.339 ]




SEARCH



Impact method

Method assessment

© 2024 chempedia.info