Immunoassay separation procedures

The methylxanthines can be determined in foods and biological systems by the chromatographic methods of TLC, GC, HPLC, or CE. Ultraviolet spectroscopy following a separation procedure can also be used. More recently, immunoassay methods have been developed. There is no single best method the analyst must balance the features of each assay with the final requirements for data precision and reproducibility. 

Mild conjugation reactions have been used in an enzyme-linked immunoassay for detecting cephalexin residues in milk, hen tissues, and eggs. The assay was a double-antibody separation procedure based on use of a rabbit antiserum... 

Heterogenous fluorescence immunoassays can be carried out with the aid of the same separation procedures used in radioimmunoassay. The more expedient homogenous fluorescence immunoassays require quenching, enhancement, polarization, or shifting of the fluorescence of the label upon binding of the labeled analyte to its antibody. Occasionally, a second antibody, directed at the anti analyte antibody, will be used in a double-antibody method to precipitate the bound labeled and unlabeled analyte or to alter the optical properties of the label in such a way as to make the analysis more sensitive. 

The main advantage of a homogeneous immunoassay, compared to a heterogeneous immunoassay, is the absence of a separation step. This translates into a simpler procedure and easier automation. However, homogeneous assays are typically less sensitive and more susceptible to sample interferences which are removed in a separation step. 

The analytical response generated by an immunoassay is caused by the interaction of the analyte with the antibody. Although immunoassays have greater specificity than many other analytical procedures, they are also subject to significant interference problems. Interference is defined as any alteration in the assay signal different from the signal produced by the assay under standard conditions. Specific (cross-reactivity) and nonspecific (matrix) interferences may be major sources of immunoassay error and should be controlled to the greatest extent possible. Because of their different impacts on analyses, different approaches to minimize matrix effects and antibody cross-reactivity will be discussed separately. 

It may be important to consider the variability of the matrix due to the physiological nature of the sample. In the case of LC-M/MS-based procedures, appropriate steps should be taken to ensure the lack of matrix effects throughout application of the method, especially if the nature of the matrix changes from the matrix used during method validation. For Microbiological and immunoassay, if separation is used prior to assay for study samples but not for standards, it is important to establish recovery and use it in determining results. In this case, possible approaches to assess efficiency and reproducibility of recovery are ... 

Like in RILAs, an advantage of fluorescence detection is the possibility of developing homogeneous FILAs using direct or indirect (competitive or displacement) approaches. The fluorescence polarization immunoassay (PFIA) and their homolog fluorescence polarization immuno-like assay (PFILA) are two of the most widely used procedures in homogeneous fluoroassays. Both are based on the principle that fluorescence polarization gives a direct measure of the bound/free ratio of the labeled analyte (tracer) without the need for their separation [23, 28]. 

The term homogeneous immunoassay may be defined as an immunoassay in which the extent of the antigen-antibody reaction can be determined without physical separation of the free and bound forms. This term is usually used for immunoassays such as enzyme and fluorescence immunoassays in which labeled substances (markers) are used. It does not include immunoassay systems such as nephelometry in which no labeled substances are used. Homogeneous immunoassays are widely used as routine tests because the procedures involved are simple. The principle of homogeneous immunoassay is based on changes in signals of the indicators by the antigen-antibody reaction (N5, U2). 

Cross-reactivity (e.g. due to metabolites) can only be eliminated by collecting appropriate fractions from HPLC separations or applying solid phase extractions (SPE) preceeding the immunoassay procedure. 

A sandwich assay for HCG using GOD as label is also described (309). The procedure is based on an amperometric enzyme immunoassay with an electrode-immobilized antibody. The antibody electrode (activated glassy carbon) is used both to separate the assay and to monitor the activity of the bound enzyme label. Two monoclonal antibodies directed against different antigenic sites are used ... 

Antigens, haptens, and antibodies radiolabeled with or are commonly used as tracers in immunoassay. These nuclides can be introduced directly into functional groups normally present in proteins and other macromolecules or into suitable derivatives that can be synthesized by a variety of chemical procedures. The most widely used iodination methods have been direct chemical or enzymic substitution of hydrogen in tyrosine or related groups using chloramine-T or lactoperoxidase, respectively. These methods are described in separate chapters in this volume. 

A word of caution is necessary. Given the success of HPLC, it is easy to think that HPLC is always the best and most appropriate method of analysing most compounds in most samples. The good analyst must choose the best solution to each analytical problem basing the choice on the nature of the analyte, the level of accuracy and precision required, the expected numbers of samples as well as the facilities and expertise available. There is little purpose in spending months to develop a very precise assay when the sample collection procedure is imprecise or using HPLC to measure compounds more appropriately measured by an immunoassay. Even given that a problem requires a separation mode, HPLC is not always the most appropriate method for example a number of samples may be run in parallel by TLC if only qualitative information is required. 

Separation-free, homogeneous immunoassay protocols offer several advantages in comparison to heterogeneous methods. Because no separation is involved, the number of procedural steps is decreased, which decreases the time required per assay. Additionally, because the physical transfer step is avoided, potential sample loss related to this step is eliminated. Drugs with low molecular weights (amphetamines, digoxin) are commonly measured by separation-free homogeneous immunoassay protocols. ... 

Different animals immunized with the same conjugate can produce antibodies that may differ in affinities, titer, and specificities. Such differences are apparent with antibodies studied by the more classical physical chemical procedures. For a particular immunoassay, each antiserum from an individual animal must be characterized separately to select those that have the proper affinities and specificities. A single animal (e.g., a rabbit) can furnish antisera for many thousand determinations depending upon the titer of the antisera, the affinities of the antibodies and the individual immunoassay procedure used. 

The parent compounds and the metabolites have very low aqueous, solubility. They have proven difficult to extract from some matrices the current method for ivermectin involves some 41 concentration and clean-up steps preceding HPLC (8). A Merck method for recovering abamectin residues from strawberries and formation of fluorescent derivatives for HPLC analysis has 18 separate steps (9). A recently published two-step solid-phase recovery procedure for ivermectin from serum indicates that it is possible to combine an abbreviated concentration and cleanup method with a sensitive and specific detection system in this case, liquid chromatography (10). An immunoassay for avermectins that could be interfaced with simplified residue recovery protocols is a promising solution to the intensifying demands on regulatory agencies to monitor these compounds. 

---