Hydrophobic membrane filter

Other applications of filters include sterilization of venting or displacement air in tissue and microbiological culture (carbon filters and hydrophobic membrane filters) decontamination of air in mechanical ventilators (glass fibre filters) treatment of exhausted air ftom microbiological safety cabinets (HEPA filters) and the clarification and sterilization of medical gases (glass wool depth filters and hydrophobic membrane filters). 

The second important piece in the process development is the separation scheme. Several methods were suggested, such as decanting, water extraction or fractional distillation, use of hydrocyclones, hydrophobic membrane filters, etc. In the early work at EBC, many of its patents refer to facilitating catalyst separation via immobilization, although no mention is given on how activity was impacted by that immobilization. Furthermore, there were no details on how immobilization was achieved and which were the preferred means and techniques. 

Filters for use in sterile gas filtration must conform to standards similar to those mandated for sterile hquid filtration. Nondestmctive integrity tests may be apphed. The tests are performed by wetting the filter with an appropriate solvent, commonly 60/40 isopropyl alcohol/water for hydrophobic membranes, and applying air or nitrogen gas at a preset pressure. 

In this work hybrid method is suggested to determine anionic surfactants in waters. It is based on preconcentration of anionic surfactants as their ion associates with cationic dyes on the membrane filter and measurement of colour intensity by solid-phase spectrophotometry method. Effect of different basic dyes, nature and hydrophobicity of anionic surfactants, size of membrane filter pores, filtration rate on sensitivity of their determination was studied. Various cationic dyes, such as Methylene Blue, Crystal Violet, Malachite Green, Rhodamine 6G, Safranin T, Acridine Yellow were used as counter ions. The difference in reflection between the blank and the sample was significant when Crystal Violet or Rhodamine 6G or Acridine Yellow were used. 

Growth-based technologies ATP hioluminescence impedance and conductivity Hydrophobic grid membrane filter methods... 

Classic solid phase substrates used in biotesting, such as microtiter plates, membrane filters or microscope slides, have been the first supports used for NA immobilization in array fabrication [27]. Desired attributes of any DNA array substrate include (i) chemical homogeneity (ii) thermal and chemical stability (iii) ability to control surface chemical properties such as polarity or hydrophobicity (iv) ability to be activated with a wide range of chemical functionalities (v) reproducibihty of the surface modification processes involved (vi) inert with respect to enzymatic activity especially ones involved in DNA manipulation and (vii) ultra-low intrinsic fluorescence. 

Snated filter, e.g., a glass fiber mat impregnated with a mercurous salt ition and a humectant (29). Although detectabilities well below 100 pptv were obtainable, batch to batch filter performance showed marked variability and impregnated filters could not be stored over a month-long period without loss of performance. We therefore carried out the desired reaction using a diffusion scrubber air was sampled through a porous hydrophobic membrane tube while a dilute mercurous nitrate solution was circulated on the outside of the membrane tube. Mercury liberated by reaction at the gas-liquid interface in the pores is carried by the air stream to the detector. 

The traditional separation of two phases (in most cases, organic/aqueous) can be performed in a parallel manner by several methods. One possibibty is to use a robotic system with phase detection and hquid-level detection (see Section 8.3). Another method is fhe use of adsorbent packing cartridges to adsorb fhe aqueous phase (Na2SO4, MgSOr, alumina, EXtrelut ). Furthermore, a hydrophobic membrane or frit (PTFE) in a polypropylene cartridge can be used to separate a dichloromethane or chloroform phase from an aqueous phase (Fig. 1). The dichloromethane or chloroform phase can pass fhrough the frit, while the aqueous phase remains on top of fhe filter. 

In selecting a membrane material, its pH compatibility and wettability should be considered. Some hydrophobic membranes require prewetting with a low-surface-tension solvent such as alcohol, whereas cartridges containing membranes are often presterilized using gamma irradiation. Such filter systems do not require assembly and steam sterilization. 

Of course, the opposite phenomenon occurs with hydrophilic liquid filters where air bubbles are present in the liquid process stream it is called "air-binding". Often a hydrophobic vent-filter will be used in conjunction with the main hydrophilic membrane filter to allow escape of accumulated air without permitting liquid leakage. 

The principle of the water intrusion test derives from the mercury intrusion test, which (applicable to both hydrophilic and hydrophobic membranes) is restricted to laboratory conditions. The membrane is placed in contact with the fluid (water in the case of the water penetration test, mercury in the case of the mercury intrusion test), and the pressure is increased, with the purpose of forcing the fluid into the pores. The volume of fluid forced into the pores is a measure of pore size and void space volume and thus of filter integrity. 

Insulin deposition in the controlled-release micropump is not expected to be important. While it was significant in one of the prototypes (Figure 4), changing the rate-controlling membrane from a hydrophobic polycarbonate filter to a hydrophilic Cuprophane or cellulose acetate membrane has apparently eliminated the problem. Although the situation may be different as longer-term experiments are performed, presumably the problems that may arise may relate more to the biological stability of the insulin reservoir than to insulin deposition. 

---