Hydrodynamic mechanism, contact

Physical or mechanical methods of cell disruption are the most widely researched in terms of containment. The underlying principle is either by breakage of the cell wall by mechanical contact, the application of liquid or hydrodynamic shear forces, or the application of solid shear forces. Cell disruption by non-physical methods generally involve simple operations which may be carried out in large tanks or vessels, which may or may not require agitation. 

A pure SiC - H2O system, which is perfectly hydrodynamically lubricated at low temperatures will not show any wear worthwhile to be modelled. We are therefore talking about situations, which either reflect a running in of a system or a case, in which direct material contact is at least part of the process. When evaluating such wear conditions the conditions chosen for an experiment - i.e. experimentally boundary conditions which all serious reports quote - are certainly not those experienced at the material s outer surface. The reason for this is that in real surfaces consist of asperities. During wear those asperities are the only areas in direct mechanical contact and as such they collide and scratch each other. 

The cleaning process proceeds by one of three primary mechanisms solubilization, emulsification, and roll-up [229]. In solubilization the oily phase partitions into surfactant micelles that desorb from the solid surface and diffuse into the bulk. As mentioned above, there is a body of theoretical work on solubilization [146, 147] and numerous experimental studies by a variety of spectroscopic techniques [143-145,230]. Emulsification involves the formation and removal of an emulsion at the oil-water interface the removal step may involve hydrodynamic as well as surface chemical forces. Emulsion formation is covered in Chapter XIV. In roll-up the surfactant reduces the contact angle of the liquid soil or the surface free energy of a solid particle aiding its detachment and subsequent removal by hydrodynamic forces. Adam and Stevenson s beautiful photographs illustrate roll-up of lanoline on wood fibers [231]. In order to achieve roll-up, one requires the surface free energies for soil detachment illustrated in Fig. XIII-14 to obey... 

Extraparticle Transport and Dispersion Mechanisms Extraparticle mechanisms are affecded by the design of the contacting device and depend on the hydrodynamic conditions outside the particles. 

Certain hydrodynamical problems, as well as mass-transfer problems in the presence of surface-active agents, have been investigated theoretically under steady-state conditions (L3, L4, L10, R9). However, if we take into account the fact that in gas-liquid dispersions, the nonstationary term must appear in the equation of mass- or heat-transfer, it becomes apparent that an exact analysis is possible if a mixing-contacting mechanism is adopted instead of a theoretical streamline flow around a single bubble sphere. 

The CMP process is regarded as a combination of chemical effect, mechanical effect, and hydrodynamic effect [110-116]. Based on contact mechanics, hydrodynamics theories and abrasive wear mechanisms, a great deal of models on material removal mechanisms in CMP have been proposed [110,111,117-121]. Although there is still a lack of a model that is able to describe the entire available CMP process, during which erosion and abrasive wear are agreed to be two basic effects. 

The archetypal, stagewise extraction device is the mixer-settler. This consists essentially of a well-mixed agitated vessel, in which the two liquid phases are mixed and brought into intimate contact to form a two phase dispersion, which then flows into the settler for the mechanical separation of the two liquid phases by continuous decantation. The settler, in its most basic form, consists of a large empty tank, provided with weirs to allow the separated phases to discharge. The dispersion entering the settler from the mixer forms an emulsion band, from which the dispersed phase droplets coalesce into the two separate liquid phases. The mixer must adequately disperse the two phases, and the hydrodynamic conditions within the mixer are usually such that a close approach to equilibrium is obtained within the mixer. The settler therefore contributes little mass transfer function to the overall extraction device. 

Convection. This is the physical movement of the solution in which the electroactive material is dissolved. In practice, convection arises from two causes, i.e. from deliberate movement of the solution, e.g. by mechanical stirring (sometimes called hydrodynamic control, see Chapter 7) or, alternatively, convection is induced when the amount of charge passed through an electrode causes localized heating of the solution in contact with it. The convective stirring in such instances occurs since the density p of most solvents depends on their temperature typically, p increases as the temperature decreases. 

Steric elution mode occurs when the particles are greater than 1 jm. Such large particles have negligible diffusion and they accumulate near the accumulation wall. The mean layer thickness is indeed directly proportional to D and inversely proportional to the field force F (see Equation 12.3). The condition is depicted in Figure 12.4b. The particles will reach the surface of the accumulation wall and stop. The particles of a given size will form a layer with the particle centers elevated by one radius above the wall the greater the particle dimension, the deeper the penetration into the center of the parabolic flow profile, and hence, larger particles will be displaced more rapidly by the channel flow than smaller ones. This behavior is exactly the inverse of the normal elution mode and it is referred to as inverted elution order. The above-described mechanism is, however, an oversimplified model since the particles most likely do not come into contact with the surface of the accumulation wall since, in proximity of the wall, other forces appear—of hydrodynamic nature, that is, related to the flow—which lift the particles and exert opposition to the particle s close approach to the wall. 

As the mechanics and hydrodynamics of water cooling became better understood, fill or packing material was included in designs to slow the vertical fall of water and to provide greater air/water interfacial contact for more difficult cooling. Today, every one of these techniques is utilized in some form or another. 

Wear can result from a number of different processes, such as corrosion, metal-to-metal contact, or abrasion by solid particles. Corrosion wear can start from acidic products of combustion (Kreuz, 1969) mechanical wear from metal-to-metal contact or abrasion is normally prevented by hydrodynamic lubrication with an oil film thick enough to keep moving parts separated. 

Nascent surface Explain the difference in the concept of liquid lubrication mechanism in (a) hydrodynamic, (b) elastohydrodynamic and (c) boundary lubrication. Which of the following characterize (a), (b), and (c) lubrication regime continuous fluid film, negligible deformation, complete separation of the surfaces, elastic and plastic deformation, no wear takes place, no contact between the sliding surfaces, involving surface topography, physical and chemical adsorption, catalysis and reaction kinetics, and tribochemical film formation ... 

From the usual plate-type distillation and absorption columns, it was but natural to attempt to devise stagewise equipment for G/S processing, for better heat economy and better utilization of the contacting media. But instability of the downcomer for solids transfer between stages remained for many years an unsolved hydrodynamic problem, and even to this data, the stable operation of many solids downcomers still depends on mechanical devices. 

This model implicitly assumes that, at least to some extent, the pad makes contact with the wafer surface (i.e., the pad directly presses the abrasive against the surface) and exerts pressure directly to the surface. The abrasive then moves across the surface as a Hertzian indenter. As discussed in Chapter 4 however, it is also possible that a continuous fluid layer exists between the wafer and the pad. The pad compresses the fluid layer, which in turn exerts hydrodynamic pressure on the surface. The existence of a hydrodynamic fluid layer is an important distinction because the wear mechanisms are different for fluid-based wear as opposed to Hertzian indenter-based wear (see Chapter 4). 

J. Tichy, J. Levert, L. Shan, and S. Danyluk, Contact Mechanics and Lubrication Hydrodynamics of Chemical-Mechanical Polishing", to be published in Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 1998... 

---