Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Implicit models

The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm can be summarized in the following steps  [Pg.53]

Choose a reasonable value of initial point 0o, an initial value of the damping factor Xo and a factor v 1. [Pg.53]

Repeat steps from 3 to 5 until a suitably chosen termination check is verified. [Pg.53]

Systems encountered in chemical kinetics can be very often represented by implicit models in the form (3.10), for which the explicit solution can be obtained only in a few simple cases. Since for these models, the variables y, to be compared with the experimental data, are not available, it is also impossible to directly compute both the gradient and the Hessian matrix of the objective function. [Pg.53]

Let us first consider the gradient vector of the weighted least square objective function (3.22), whose generic component has the form [Pg.53]


In the material balance example, the matrix B contains the material balance coefficients for the component flows based on the implicit model of the process. These adjustments can be done by hand or by... [Pg.2567]

Tables 11-6, 11-7, and 11-8 show calculated solvatochromic shifts for the nucle-obases. Solvation effects on uracil have been studied theoretically in the past using both explicit and implicit models [92, 94, 130, 149, 211-214] (see Table 11-6). Initial studies used clusters of uracil with a few water molecules. Marian et al. [130] calculated excited states of uracil and uracil-water clusters with two, four and six water molecules. Shukla and Lesczynski [122] studied uracil with three water molecules using CIS to calculate excitation energies. Improta et al. [213] used a cluster of four water molecules embedded into a PCM and TDDFT calculations to study the solvatochromic shifts on the absorption and emission of uracil and thymine. Zazza et al. [211] used the perturbed matrix method (PMM) in combination with TDDFT and CCSD to calculate the solvatochromic shifts. The shift for the Si state ranges between (+0.21) - (+0.54) eV and the shift for the S2 is calculated to be between (-0.07) - (-0.19) eV. Thymine shows very similar solvatochromic shifts as seen in Table 11-6 [92],... Tables 11-6, 11-7, and 11-8 show calculated solvatochromic shifts for the nucle-obases. Solvation effects on uracil have been studied theoretically in the past using both explicit and implicit models [92, 94, 130, 149, 211-214] (see Table 11-6). Initial studies used clusters of uracil with a few water molecules. Marian et al. [130] calculated excited states of uracil and uracil-water clusters with two, four and six water molecules. Shukla and Lesczynski [122] studied uracil with three water molecules using CIS to calculate excitation energies. Improta et al. [213] used a cluster of four water molecules embedded into a PCM and TDDFT calculations to study the solvatochromic shifts on the absorption and emission of uracil and thymine. Zazza et al. [211] used the perturbed matrix method (PMM) in combination with TDDFT and CCSD to calculate the solvatochromic shifts. The shift for the Si state ranges between (+0.21) - (+0.54) eV and the shift for the S2 is calculated to be between (-0.07) - (-0.19) eV. Thymine shows very similar solvatochromic shifts as seen in Table 11-6 [92],...
Gie, D.N., "A simple Implicit Model for Thermal Cracking of Crude Oils", Annu. Fall Meeting of Soc. Petroleum Engrs, SPE Paper No 14226 (Sept. 19 5). [Pg.426]

In a classical regression approach, the measurements of the independent variables are assumed to be free of error (i.e., for explicit models), while the observations of the dependent variables, the responses of the system, are subject to errors. However, in some engineering problems, observations of the independent variables also contain errors (i.e., for implicit models). In this case, the distinction between independent and dependent variables is no longer clear. [Pg.178]

In the development of solvation models, Cramer and Tmhalar have made several noteworthy contributions [8-11]. Most of the implicit solvation models do not include the effect of first solvation shell on the solute properties. This can be satisfactorily treated by finding the best effective radii within implicit models. In addition to the first-solvent-shell effects, dispersion interactions and hydrogen bonding are also important in obtaining realistic information on the solvent effect of chemical systems. [Pg.386]

Although the chemometric tools discussed in this book into both of these categories, most of the emphasis is on implicit modeling. Valid explicit models are notnmunon in practice and, therefore, implicit models are often necessary to anfee the data and/or construct predictive models. [Pg.6]

The concentration range for components A and B are both from 10 to 30 units and can be varied in the process for the calibration experiments. Because the level of C cannot be controlled, it is assumed that sufficient variation in the levd of C is captured during the data collection. This is necessary in order to implicitly model the variation of C. However, if C is not effectively modeled, the prediction diagnostics will indicate the deficiency. [Pg.147]

How can the inverse method correct for the interferent when it was not explicitly included in the model For this example, it is easy to see. Recall that the spectrum of the interferent is ij - [3 0 0]. The estimated regression vectors (b) in Figure 5.63c have zeros for the variable on which the interferent responds (variable 1). In this case, the inverse approach has implicitly modeled the presence of the interferent by ignoring the response variable that is assooiated With the interfering component. This example demonstrates that, for this weU-... [Pg.308]

It is an inverse model with the associated implicit modeling capability as discussed in Section 5.3. [Pg.351]

Fig. 1. Representation of the solvation models continuum or implicit model and explicit model. Fig. 1. Representation of the solvation models continuum or implicit model and explicit model.
H.I. Britt and R.H. Luecke, The estimation of parameters in nonlinear implicit models. Technometrics, 15 (1973) 233-241. [Pg.219]


See other pages where Implicit models is mentioned: [Pg.2548]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.400]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.161 , Pg.166 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.53 , Pg.54 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.161 , Pg.166 ]




SEARCH



ASC implicit solvent models

Explicit-implicit solvent models

Implicit

Implicit Continuum Solvent Models

Implicit Models for Condensed Phases

Implicit membrane models

Implicit penultimate model

Implicit solvent models

Implicit solvent models Subject

Implicit versus explicit modeling

Implicit water models

Model semi-implicit method

Molecular dynamics simulations implicit solvation model

Relative Merits of Explicit and Implicit Solvent Models

Solvation explicit/implicit hybrid models

Solvation models implicit

Time implicit model equations for the shortcut method

© 2024 chempedia.info