Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

History of Sample Preparation

In drug screening, the biological matrix is of special importance because of its complexity. In order to detect and identify the drugs that it contains, these must be separated from the matrix. The endogenous components such as proteins and lipids, which can interfere with the analysis, must be removed. As some drugs are present in only trace amounts, a concentration stage must be included before injection (Fig. 7-1). [Pg.53]

For many years, liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) was used for the preparation of samples with biological matrixes, but this technique is no longer as important today. The reasons for this include  [Pg.53]

Solid phase extraction (SPE) was developed during the last 10 years as an effective analytical tool for the isolation and purification of a wide range of compounds. For many applications in pharmacy and biomedicine, it is playing an increasingly important part in sample preparation both for trace concentrations and for the isolation of substances on a preparative scale [20]. [Pg.54]

SPE has some special advantages over the traditional liquid-liquid extraction technique. These include  [Pg.54]


Filamentous F-actin gels show viscoelastic properties with an average elastic shear modulus in the range of 20-420 Pa [78]. The modulus depends strongly on the length of the filaments and the history of sample preparation, such as the mechanical disruption of actin nanofibrils prior to or during the deformation. Fluorescence microscopy experiments confirmed that applying small shear stresses to F-actin can... [Pg.174]

Figure 8. The fragility parameter m is plotted as a function of the NMT nonlinearity parameter Xnmt- The curve is predicted by the RFOT theory when the temperature variation of >o is neglected. The data are taken from Ref. [49]. The disagreement may reflect a breakdown of phenomenology for the history dependence of sample preparation. The more fragile substances consistently lie above the prediction, which has no adjustable parameters. This discrepancy may be due to softening effects. Figure 8. The fragility parameter m is plotted as a function of the NMT nonlinearity parameter Xnmt- The curve is predicted by the RFOT theory when the temperature variation of >o is neglected. The data are taken from Ref. [49]. The disagreement may reflect a breakdown of phenomenology for the history dependence of sample preparation. The more fragile substances consistently lie above the prediction, which has no adjustable parameters. This discrepancy may be due to softening effects.
How Tc varies with x and the maximum solubility range (x) for a specific 3d metal differs from group to group. These differences simply arise from the synthesis history of the samples (47). We illustrate this point in Figure 9b where we show the variation of Tc as a function of x for a series of samples prepared at 970°C and 920°C. Note that increasing the annealing temperature increases the Tc dependence upon x and also reduces the solubility range. This is also... [Pg.326]

The dependence of excitation transport on local chromophore concentration has been used to provide qualitative information on the characteristics of polymers in blends. Excimer fluorescence resulting from excitation transport has been employed to characterize polymer miscibility, phase separation and the kinetics of spinodal decomposition (1-31. Qualitative characterization of phase separation in blends (4.51 and the degree of chain entanglement as a function of sample preparation and history (6.71 has also been investigated through transport with trapping experiments. In these experiments one polymer in the blend contains donor chromophores and the second contains acceptors. Selective excitation of the former and detection of the latter provides a qualitative measure of interpenetration of the two components. [Pg.324]

Our results also indicate that thermal history and sample preparation conditions can alter the morphology and texture of the polymer and also influence the melting point. The preferred orientation of the smectic layered structure of the cast films on the glass substrate is not altogether unexpected since such observations are commonly found among mesogenic compounds. [Pg.85]

Experience in the chemical cleaning industry has shown that no two iron oxides are alike. The heat history, density, and impurities may have a very large effect on the actual rate of deposit removal. Azuma and Kametani made systematic studies of the effect of sample preparation on oxide dissolution. The formation temperature of the oxide markedly influenced the dissolution rate. The physical properties apparently controlling the reaction were the surface area (calculated by a permeability method) and a normalizing factor that is dependent on the aggregate crystal structure. Baud and Perrier and Fields also demonstrated the importance of the scale structure (layers and microcracks). McPherson showed that the presence of chromium-containing spinels has a marked influence on deposits found in the superheat or reheat sections of power boilers. [Pg.34]

Choi S, Vaidya NY, Han CD, Sota N, Hashimoto T (2003) Effects of sample preparation method and thermal history on phase transition in highly asymmetric block copolymers comparison with symmetric block copolymers. Macromolecules 36 7707-7720... [Pg.144]

From a technical standpoint, this article emphasizes recent advances in sample preparation and instrumentation. A brief history of modern sample preparation techniques is covered, together with the impact of modern instrumentation on water sample analysis. [Pg.818]

Sample Preparation. Samples for mechanical studies were made by compression molding the polymers at 150°C between Teflon sheets for 15 minutes followed by rapid quenching to room temperature in air. These will be referred to as PQ (press-quenched or simply quenched) samples. The thickness of the PQ samples was around 10 mils (0.25 mm). The thermal history of all of the PQ samples (HBIB, HIBI, and LDPE) were essentially the same. They were used within one week after they were pressed. Samples for morphology, SALS and SEM studies were prepared from toluene solutions. These films were cast on a Teflon sheet at 80 C from a 1% (by weight) solution in toluene. These films were about 5 mils in thickness. When the polymer films had solidified (after 5 hrs), they were stored in a vacuum oven at 80°C for two days to remove residual solvent. These samples will be designated by TOL (solution cast from toluene). [Pg.123]


See other pages where History of Sample Preparation is mentioned: [Pg.63]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.2025]    [Pg.1971]    [Pg.2191]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.2008]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.1848]    [Pg.2146]    [Pg.2142]    [Pg.2220]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.1968]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.93]   


SEARCH



Preparation of samples

Preparative history

Sample history

© 2024 chempedia.info