Hierarchial level

I ask 3 Transform ( inherit ) local Taylor expansions from a upper hierarchy level to the next lower hierarchy level. 

Control Valves and Other Final Control Elements. Good control at any hierarchial level requites good performance by the final control elements in the next lower level. At the higher control levels, the final control element may be a control appHcation at the next lower control level. However, the control command must ultimately affect the process through the final control elements at the regulatory control level, eg, control valves. 

Wild DJ, Blankley J. Comparison of 2D fingerprint types and hierarchy level selection methods for structural grouping using Ward s clustering. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000 40 155-62. 

As noted in the Molecular Simulation of Structure and Properties section, there have been no fundamental principle-based mathematical models for Nafion that have predicted new phenomena or caused property improvements in a significant way. This is due to a number of limitations inherent in one or the other of the various schemes. These shortcomings include an inability to sufficiently account for chemical identity, an inability to simulate and predict the long-range structure as would be probed by SAXS or TEM, and the failure to simulate structure over different hierarchy levels. Certainly, advances in this important research front will emerge and be combined with advances in experimentally derived information to yield a much deeper state of understanding of Nafion. 

D Fingerprint Types and Hierarchy Level Selection Methods for Structural Grouping Using Ward s Clustering. 

Within a framework for planning in complex systems, it is essential to keep five hierarchial levels of decision-making and not confuse them with each other (Robert, 2000) (see Fig. 4.12) ... 

Three coherent themes appear as we examine changing notions of what the world as a whole is like Expanding horizons, Hierarchial levels of structure, and Increasing mediocrity. 

It will be thus necessary to introduce a hierarchical approach. Lapkin et al. [65] have proposed four vertical hierarchy levels (i) product and process, (ii) company, (iii) infrastructure and (iv) society. Each level should reflect different boundary limits and use an appropriate choice of indicators. It is proposed also that the choice of appropriate indicators depends on the speciflcs of the industry sector and even on the types of products. The indicators should reflect speciflc by-products, wastes and emissions that are characteristic of the process or the product. Of course, alimit of the approach is how to make uniform the comparison between diflferent industrial sectors. On the other hand, we have already remarked that industrial chemical production is different from other manufacture industrial sectors, because (i) it includes very different types of productions, from several thousand tons per day in refinery to kg amounts per day in fine chemical production and (ii) it is characterized by a highly integrated structure in which a large part of the products are the input for other chemical processes. 

Information collected from a hierarchial level is more efficient than that collected from a more fundamental level. This is J. Ramsay s "molecular level information" observation (in this symposium s proceedings). This can also be stated in a different way ast "By searching an abstracted representation of a space, the comblnatorlmetrlcs can be reduced. The search of the abstract space is quicker because it is smaller single steps in the abstract space correspond to big steps in the ground search space."(5)... 

In the chapter of Briiggemann and Carlsen some concepts introduced in the chapter of El-Basil are revitalized and explained in the context of the multivariate aspect. Basic concepts, like chain, anti-chain, hierarchies, levels, etc., as well as more sophisticated ones, like sensitivity studies, dimension theory, linear extensions and some basic elements of probability concepts are at the heart of this chapter. The difficult problem of equivalent objects, which lead to the items object sets vs. quotient sets are explained and exemplified. 

The widely accepted basis of all enzyme classifications are the recommendations of the Enzyme Committee (E.C.) of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB)1491. Within this system, enzymatic activities are classified by a four-level hierarchy and each entry is described by a set of four numbers. The first number describes the top level and can be either 1 for oxidoreductases, 2 for transferases, 3 for hydrolases, 4 for lyases, 5 for isomerases or 6 for ligases. The meaning of the three lower hierarchy levels depends on the top level group. As an example, glycogen synthase is classified as 2.4.1.11 here, the 2 stands for transferases, the 4 for glycosyl-transferases, the 1 for hexosyl-transferases and the 11 for the particular subfamily. 

As an example, myoglobin, which is the best studied protein in this respect, exists in two conformations, which are called the tensed and relaxed conformations, referring to the two states in which the ligand is bound or released. We associate a zero-order hierarchy level with these two conformations. The free enthalpy G as a function of a relevant configurational coordinate seems to have a well-defined minimum. 

A closer look at the energy surface, however, reveals that it is rugged. In one definite conformation, the protein can exist in at least three different conformational substates differing by the binding angle of the ligand with respect to the heme plane. These states are called the taxonomic states. Myoglobin has different properties in the three conformational substates, for instance, different kinetic behaviors and different IR frequencies. A further hierarchy level is immediately obvious from the fact... 

Fig. 11. Hierarchical structural disorder in proteins. J rogressively lower hierarchy levels are characterized by negative numbers. The magnifying glass symbolizes the increasingly higher resolution.

This experiment shows that, although proteins are similar to glasses, they are also very different. The smoothness of the spectral diffusion broadening in the glass reflects the fact that there are no distinguishable hierarchy levels and that it is, under the conditions of our experiment, essentially an infinite system. The protein is finite. There is no smooth distribution of structural states. Within the temperature range accessible... 

Gene Operon Hierarchy level Gene product ... 

Hierarchy levels that include process, operation, and interaction descriptions... 

---