Hazard assessments findings

Hazard assessment findings are similar to audits, in that they are periodic measures. Hazard assessments might include Hazard and Operability (HA-ZOP) studies, What-If/Checklists, Fault Tree Analyses, or other techniques. The results of these studies will indicate what types of hazards exist and whether or not these hazards are sufficiently controlled. 

Establish a system to respond to the workplace hazard assessment findings, which shall address prevention, mitigation, and emergency responses. 

Amendments to the Clean Air Act require employer-employees consultation to develop and implement PSM program elements and hazard assessments. Section 304 requires employee training and education on the findings of PSM incident investigations. 

In this framework hazard assessment is mainly based on toxicity testing in clean laboratory conditions. Findings of laboratory studies are then extrapolated to higher levels of natural system hierarchy (from organisms to communities and even ecosystems) using various factors (Smrchek and Zeeman, 1998). 

In relation to a hazard assessment, the relative lack of sensitivity of human data may cause particular difficulty. Therefore, negative human data cannot be used to override the positive findings in animals, unless it has been demonstrated that the mode of action of a certain toxic response observed in animals is not relevant for humans. In such a case, a full justification is required. 

The inexperienced practitioner can easily enter into too mnch detail too soon (e.g. it is often more efficient to stop the argnment at a solntion, which contains a Compliance Matrix or an FTA, than to hy to replicate these within the GSN). Therefore, the assessor may elect to restrain GSN to a top-level argiunent only and not to repeat each finding which exist in tabular format (e.g. such as in a Fnnctional Hazard Assessment)... 

The Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA) asks the question How safe does the system need to be considering the required functionality and the specific environmental context of the system. A typically used technique in that phase is the Functional Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (Functional FMEA) to find all theoretically possible failure modes which then can be traced to hazards. 

The risk assessment process is a journey rather than an event. Companies that are just starting to complete risk assessments find their first efforts will require more time and will be less complete than later efforts. As personnel involved receive training and become more familiar with the risk assessment process, more hazards will be identified, more risk reduction methods deployed and the risk assessment process will improve and hasten in pace. As lessons are learned and experience is gained, risk assessment becomes more refined. However, some time and experience is required for the risk assessment process to become fully integrated into a company. How much time depends on the company and its circumstances, but it typically takes months, not weeks. Eventually the risk assessment process will become a part of normal business procedures. Until then, industry needs time to fully and formally implement these concepts. (Introduction)... 

Step 3 Check or Study As the SMS and its elements are implemented, periodic review and surveys are made to ensure that resistance to change is reduced and any concerns or issues are addressed. Study may find where buy-in needs to be improved, concerns with time requirements and budgets need to be addressed, and hazard assessments improved. 

An analysis is made of assessment findings to determine the nature and impact of hazardous conditions, at-risk, and loss-producing events. Jobs and activities with the highest potential for loss are given the first priority for JHA development. 

A variety of outside services may be needed from independent consultants, engineers, or other specialists to supplement internal resources. As the JHA process and the overall hazard and risk assessment findings are analyzed, the complexity of most operations requires specialists with in-depth expertise necessary to provide specific solutions. 

Safety Person or designated person), in conjunction with supervisors, will conduct a walk-through survey of each work area to identify sources of work hazards. Each survey will be documented using the Hazard Assessment Certification Form, which identifies the work area surveyed, the person conducting the survey, findings of potential hazards, and date of the survey. (Safety Person or designated person) will keep the forms in the (Specify exact location, e.g., your company s business files). 

Ensure a safety system is selected and customized that matches the organization hazard and risk assessment findings. 

---