Hardness numbers mechanism underlying

The variation of the Chin-Gilman parameter with bonding type means that the mechanism underlying hardness numbers varies. As a result, this author has found that it is necessary to consider the work done by an applied shear stress during the shearing of a bond. This depends on the crystal structure, the direction of shear, and the chemical bond type. At constant crystal structure, it depends on the atomic (molecular volume). In the case of glasses, it depends on the average size of the disorder mesh. 

In textbooks, plastic deformation is often described as a two-dimensional process. However, it is intrinsically three-dimensional, and cannot be adequately described in terms of two-dimensions. Hardness indentation is a case in point. For many years this process was described in terms of two-dimensional slip-line fields (Tabor, 1951). This approach, developed by Hill (1950) and others, indicated that the hardness number should be about three times the yield stress. Various shortcomings of this theory were discussed by Shaw (1973). He showed that the experimental flow pattern under a spherical indenter bears little resemblance to the prediction of slip-line theory. He attributes this discrepancy to the neglect of elastic strains in slip-line theory. However, the cause of the discrepancy has a different source as will be discussed here. Slip-lines arise from deformation-softening which is related to the principal mechanism of dislocation multiplication a three-dimensional process. The plastic zone determined by Shaw, and his colleagues is determined by strain-hardening. This is a good example of the confusion that results from inadequate understanding of the physics of a process such as plasticity. 

Hardness H defines the resistance to local deformation of a material when indented, drilled, sawed, or abraded. It involves a complex combination of properties (elastic modulus, yield strength, strain-hardening capacity). The prevailing deformation mechanism depends upon the material and the type of tester. Hardness is either measured by (1) static penetration of the specimen with a standard inden-ter at a known force, (2) dynamic reboimd of a standard indenter of known mass dropped from a standard height, or (3) scratching with a standard pointed tool under a load. The hardness tester, indenter shape, and force employed strongly influence the hardness numbers (1). 

Another mechanical property that may be important to consider is hardness, which is a measure of a material s resistance to localized plastic deformation (e.g., a small dent or a scratch). Early hardness tests were based on natmal minerals with a scale constructed solely on the ability of one material to scratch another that was softer. A qualitative and somewhat arbitrary hardness indexing scheme was devised, termed the Mohs scale, which ranged from 1 on the soft end for talc to 10 for diamond. Quantitative hardness techniques have been developed over the years in which a small indenter is forced into the surface of a material to be tested under controlled conditions of load and rate of application. The depth or size of the resulting indentation is measured and related to a hardness number the softer the material, the larger and deeper the indentation, and the lower the hardness index number. Measured hardnesses are only relative (rather than absolute), and care should be exercised when comparing values determined by different techniques. 

The radiation and temperature dependent mechanical properties of viscoelastic materials (modulus and loss) are of great interest throughout the plastics, polymer, and rubber from initial design to routine production. There are a number of laboratory research instruments are available to determine these properties. All these hardness tests conducted on polymeric materials involve the penetration of the sample under consideration by loaded spheres or other geometric shapes [1]. Most of these tests are to some extent arbitrary because the penetration of an indenter into viscoelastic material increases with time. For example, standard durometer test (the "Shore A") is widely used to measure the static "hardness" or resistance to indentation. However, it does not measure basic material properties, and its results depend on the specimen geometry (it is difficult to make available the identity of the initial position of the devices on cylinder or spherical surfaces while measuring) and test conditions, and some arbitrary time must be selected to compare different materials. 

While simulations reach into larger time spans, the inaccuracies of force fields become more apparent on the one hand properties based on free energies, which were never used for parametrization, are computed more accurately and discrepancies show up on the other hand longer simulations, particularly of proteins, show more subtle discrepancies that only appear after nanoseconds. Thus force fields are under constant revision as far as their parameters are concerned, and this process will continue. Unfortunately the form of the potentials is hardly considered and the refinement leads to an increasing number of distinct atom types with a proliferating number of parameters and a severe detoriation of transferability. The increased use of quantum mechanics to derive potentials will not really improve this situation ab initio quantum mechanics is not reliable enough on the level of kT, and on-the-fly use of quantum methods to derive forces, as in the Car-Parrinello method, is not likely to be applicable to very large systems in the foreseeable future. 

Photocycloaddition and photoaddition can be utilized for new carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bond formation under mild conditions from synthetic viewpoints. In last three decades, a large number of these photoreactions between electron-donating and electron-accepting molecules have been appeared and discussed in the literature, reviews, and books [1-10]. In these photoreactions, a variety of reactive intermediates such as excimers, exciplexes, triplexes, radical ion pairs, and free-radical ions have been postulated and some of them have been detected as transient species to understand the reaction mechanism. Most of reactive species in solution have been already characterized by laser flash photolysis techniques, but still the prediction for the photochemical process is hard to visualize. In preparative organic photochemistry, the dilemma that the transient species including emission are hardly observed in the reaction system giving high chemical yields remains in most cases [11,12]. 

The amount of mechanical action used in hand dishwashing is extremely variable and hard to quantify. This is typified by the large number of dishwashing performance tests that are used (see Section IV). Consumers may soak items that are difficult to clean in a low mechanical action environment. Under these conditions, surface chemistry is very important. Consumers may also scrub vigorously directly on the soiled area, break up the soil particles, and suspend them. At this point interfacial processes become important again. All individuals have their own techniques. Individuals vary the amount of effort they use depending on the type and distribution of the soil on the item. However, they usually do not use enough sustained mechanical action to make a stable oil-in-water emulsion. 

Rheology is concerned with the flow and/or deformation of matter under the influence of externally imposed mechanical forces. Two limiting types of behaviour arc possible. The deformation may reverse spontaneously (relax) when the external force is removed this is called elastic behaviour and is exhibited by rigid solids. The energy used in causing the deformation is stored, and then recovered when the solid relaxes. At the other extreme, matter flows and the flow ceases (but is not reversed) when the force is removed this is called viscous behaviour and is characteristic of simple liquids. The energy needed to maintain the flow is dissipated as heat. Between the two extremes arc systems whose response to an applied force depends on the lime-scale involved. Thus pitch behaves as an elastic solid if struck but flows if left for years on a slope. Similarly, a ball of Funny Putty , a form of silicone rubber, bounces when dropped on a hard surface, when the contact time is a few milliseconds, but flows if deformed slowly on a time-scale of seconds or minutes. Systems of this kind are said to be visco-elastic. The precise nature of the observable phenomena depends on the ratio of the time it takes for the system to relax to the time taken to make an observation. This ratio is called the Deborah number (De) ... 

---