Hand wash samples

The chemical compositions of the samples, obtained from chemical analyses are reported in Table 1. In order to check the chemical analyses, the mother and washing liquors were collected, analysed and their acidity was titrated. In all cases, the alkaline cations were detected only as traces. The acidimetric titration allowed us to determine the HPA amount remaining in the solution. On the other hand, the samples separated after precipitation and washings were weighted in order to calculate the precipitate yields. The results are reported in table 1 where the samples are designated as MxY (M being the alkaline or ammonium cation, Y the heteroatom, x the stoichiometry deduced from chemical analyses. 

Jars containing the same amount of hand wash solution as used to collect the entire hand wash from the test volunteer should be fortified. The samples are fortified with the appropriate amount of active ingredient solution using a 1-mL volumetric pipet, blowing out the remaining solution in the pipet. The solutions are capped, shaken, and placed immediately in a freezer or dry-ice cooler. 

A short weathering time for hand wash and face wipe samples is appropriate since these types of samples taken from test volunteers are usually processed and frozen immediately and are not subjected to weathering as are the dosimeter or air matrices. 

Field fortification samples are stored under various conditions in the fleld. Generally, after the weathering period is complete, the fleld fortification samples such as dosimeter sections are wrapped in aluminum foil, placed in a pre-labeled zip-type bag, and immediately placed on dry-ice in a cooler or in a freezer. Field fortification samples such as hand washes or face wipes are prepared in labeled jars, the lids are immediately taped with electrical tape, and the jars are placed in a zip-type bag and wrapped in bubble-pack and immediately placed in frozen storage. Air tubes or air filters are collected after weathering and wrapped so as to prevent breakage. These samples are then placed in a pre-labeled zip-type bag and immediately placed in frozen storage. 

Samples of dosimeters, hand wash, face wipes, patches, air tubes, filters, etc., should be immediately frozen in the field by placing them in coolers of dry-ice or in freezers immediately after collection. If dry-ice is to be used, enough dry-ice should be present in the cooler to freeze the sample within 15-30 min. 

The outer layer of samples (gloves, coveralls, socks, face wash, hand wash, and hat) allowed measurement of the complete dose encountered on the outside of the protective clothing without any subsampling. This eliminated any uncertainty or error due to the highly variable deposition of residues across the body surface. This is the upper limit of the potential dose that could be encountered by the operator, and it is used to assess the effectiveness of the protective clothing and other preventive measures. 

If possible, avoid handling the ceramic shard (and especially the area to be sampled). Wear nitrile gloves or use tweezers. Washing hands before sampling will also reduce the potential of contamination by skin lipids. 

Grover, R., A.I. Cessna and L.A. Kerr (1985). Procedure for the determination of 2,4-D and dicamba in inhalation, dermal, hand-wash and urine samples, J. Environ. ScL Health, B20, 113-128. 

Although the analytical protocol was rigorously defined for the round robin test, it was deliberately left open in the "Proposed Protocol" so that one can use the analytical means, which are most appropriate for the product under study. On the other hand, it is strongly recommended that the solution of each "washed sample" be analyzed by using two different analytical techniques, e.g.,... 

The paraquat ELISA developed in our laboratory started with the synthesis of the valeric acid derivative of paraquat (I) as hapten, and took well over one man-year to develop(7) (Figure 1). It is a very good method with fractional nanogram/mL sensitivity and (once fully validated) precision slightly better than the GC method. It is applicable to air filters, clothing patches, and hand washes, and showed promise for lymph and plasma analysis. The sample throughput was greater than GC and the method could be picked up rapidly by persons not skilled in the art. (Novices frequently pick up IA much faster than veteran analysts with a history of GC and HPLC experience ). 

As noted above, the mineralized material from the urban and industrial areas contained more lead than the washed samples, while the opposite was true for samples from the rural area this could indicate that persistent contamination induces higher absorption of pollutants, by inhalation or ingestion, into bees bodies during foraging. On the other hand, the fact that higher levels of all three metals were found in the washed material than in the mineralized material in the rural environment could suggest that the pollutants are in a transitory condition, and... 

Subjects conducted a practice wash and rinse. The subjects hands were then rinsed with alcohol and contaminated with the marker organism S. marces-cens. The hands were sampled via the glove juice method. Following baseline... 

For the test procedure, subjects hands were contaminated with the test organisms. Subjects treated their hands once with a liquid soap product. They washed their hands for 30 seconds and rinsed for 15 seconds. Afterward, hands were sampled three times using the plastic bag sampling procedure. Aliquots of the three sampling solutions were diluted, plated, and incubated. Following incubation, the number of CFUs was enumerated. Antibacterial activity was determined by comparing the number of bacteria removed from the hands after washing once with the test product to the number of bacteria removed from unwashed hands. 

---