Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hall mobility, measurement

The main experimental elfects are accounted for with this model. Some approximations have been made a higher-level calculation is needed which takes into account the fact that the charge distribution of the trapped electron may extend outside the cavity into the liquid. A significant unknown is the value of the quasi-free mobility in low mobility liquids. In principle, Hall mobility measurements (see Sec. 6.3) could provide an answer but so far have not. Berlin et al. [144] estimated a value of = 27 cm /Vs for hexane. Recently, terahertz (THz) time-domain spectroscopy has been utilized which is sensitive to the transport of quasi-free electrons [161]. For hexane, this technique gave a value of qf = 470 cm /Vs. Mozumder [162] introduced the modification that motion of the electron in the quasi-free state may be in part ballistic that is, there is very little scattering of the electron while in the quasi-free state. [Pg.198]

Using lAD instead of CVD allows deposition of conformal epitaxial layers, i.e., the epitaxial layer follows the surface structure leading to so-called waffle solar cells. The porous Si wafer was heated at 850 °C for 10 min to remove the native oxide but keep the porous structure. The deposition temperature with 700 °C up to 850 °C was much lower than that of the APCVD and LPE. Typical deposition rates were 0.1 m/min, and the highest rate achieved with that set up was 0.3 pm/min (Brendel 2003). The epitaxial Si layer was Ga doped with 2x16 cm and showed a Hall mobility measured by the van der Pauw geometry of 275 cm V s But also the boron doping with lAD was reported (Oberbeck et al. 2001). [Pg.246]

Figure 22 Hall mobility measurement circuit by Munoz et al. (Redrawn from the data of Munoz, R.C., Excess Electrons in Dielectric Media, Ferradini, C. and Jay-Gerrin, J.R, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991.)... Figure 22 Hall mobility measurement circuit by Munoz et al. (Redrawn from the data of Munoz, R.C., Excess Electrons in Dielectric Media, Ferradini, C. and Jay-Gerrin, J.R, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991.)...
Figure 4 The Hall mobility measured at 77 and 300 K as a function of the thickness of the GaN buffer layer. Figure 4 The Hall mobility measured at 77 and 300 K as a function of the thickness of the GaN buffer layer.
Experimental measurement of Hall mobility produces values of the same order of magnitude as the drift mobility their ratio r = jij/l may be called the Hall ratio. If we restrict ourselves to high-mobility electrons in conducting states in which they are occasionally scattered and if we adopt a relaxation time formulation, then it can be shown that (Smith, 1978 Dekker, 1957)... [Pg.324]

It is important to realize that even in the presence of traps, the measured Hall mobility refers to that in the higher conducting state (Munoz, 1991). Thus, a value of r significantly >1.0, and increasing with temperature in a certain interval, has been taken as an evidence in favor of traps in NP near the critical point (Munoz, 1988 Munoz and Ascarelli, 1983). Similarly, a nearly constant value of r near 1.0 in TMS over the temperature interval 22-164°C has been taken to indicate absence of trapping in that liquid. The scattering mechanism in TMS is consistent with that by optical phonons (Doldissen and Schmidt, 1979 Munoz and Holroyd, 1987). [Pg.325]

Munoz and Holroyd (1987) have measured Hall mobility in TMS from 22 to 164° C. This measurement parallels very well the variation of drift mobility with temperature in this liquid, and the Hall ratio remains essentially constant at 1.0 0.1. Both the drift and Hall mobilities in TMS decrease with temperature beyond 100°C, becoming 50 cmV s-1 at 164°C. The overall conclusion is that TMS is essentially trap-free in this temperature range, and the decrease of mobilities is due not to trapping, but to some other scattering mechanism that is more effective at higher temperatures. [Pg.326]

Hall mobility in NP has been measured by Munoz and Ascarelli (1983,1984) as a function of temperature up to the critical point (160°C). It falls relatively slowly from 220 cmV s-1 at 140°C to 170 cmV s-1 at the critical temperature. The drift mobility, however, falls precipitously over that temperature interval to -30 cmV s-1 at the critical temperature. Consequently the Hall ratio r increases sharply from 1.5 at 130° to 5.5 at 160°C. This has been taken as evidence for intrinsic trapping in this liquid. [Pg.326]

Hall and drift mobilities have been measured in mixtures of n-pentane and NP by Itoh et al., (1991) between 20 and 150°C. They found both mobilities to decrease with the addition of n-pentane to the extent that the Hall mobility in a 30% solution was reduced by a factor of about 5 relative to pure NR However the Hall ratio remained in the range 0.9 to 1.5. This indicates that, up to 30% n-pentane solution in NP, the incipient traps are not strong enough to bind an electron permanently. However, they are effective in providing additional scattering mechanism for electrons in the conducting state. [Pg.326]

In comparing the results of the quasi-ballistic model with experiment, generally pq[ = 100 cn v s-1 has been used (Mozumder, 1995a) except in a case such as isooctane (Itoh et al, 1989) where a lower Hall mobility has been determined when that value is used for the quasi-free mobility. There is no obvious reason that the quasi-free mobility should be the same in all liquids, and in fact values in the range 30-400 cmV -1 have been indicated (Berlin et al, 1978). However, in the indicated range, the computed mobility depends sensitively on the trap density and the binding energy, and not so much on the quasi-free mobility if the effective mobility is less than 10 crr v s-1. A partial theoretical justification of 100 cm2 v 1s 1 for the quasi-free mobility has been advanced by Davis and Brown (1975). Experimentally, it is the measured mobility in TMS, which is considered to be trap-free (vide supra). [Pg.342]

For depth inhomogeneities in the free electron concentration n x) and electron mobility the Hall-effect measurement yields an effective... [Pg.133]

In the study by Johnson et al. (1986) it was shown by Hall effect measurements that the sheet carrier density was decreased and the mobility was increased for a thin w-type layer following exposure to a hydrogen plasma at 150°C. To explain the mobility increase it was argued that donor-H complexes were formed and that the concentration of ionized scattering centers was thereby decreased. On the basis of semiempirical calculations, a structural model was suggested for the donor-H complex in... [Pg.167]

Electrons have not been detected by optical absorption in alkanes in which the mobility is greater than 10 cm /Vs. For example, Gillis et al. [82] report seeing no infrared absorption in pulse-irradiated liquid methane at 93 K. This is not surprising since the electron mobility in methane is 500 cm /Vs [81] and trapping does not occur. Geminately recombining electrons have, however, been detected by IR absorption in 2,2,4-trimethyl-pentane in a subpicosecond laser pulse experiment [83]. The drift mobility in this alkane is 6.5 cm /Vs, and the quasi-free mobility, as measured by the Hall mobility, is 22 cm /Vs (see Sec. 6). Thus the electron is trapped two-thirds of the time. [Pg.184]

This theory has also been used to predict mobility for molecular liquids. Neopentane and TMS are liquids that exhibit maxima in the electron mobility at intermediate densities [46]. These maxima occur at the same densities at which Vq minimizes, in accordance with the Basak Cohen theory. The drift mobility in TMS has been measured as a function of pressure to 2500 bar [150]. The observed relative experimental changes of mobility with pressure are predicted quite well by the Basak-Cohen theory however, the predicted value of /i ) is 2.5 times the experimental value at 1 bar and 295 K. In this calculation, the authors used xt to evaluate the mobility. This is reasonable in this case since for liquids, there is little dilference between the adiabatic and isothermal compressibilities. A similar calculation for neopentane showed that the Basak-Cohen theory predicted the Hall mobility of the electron quite well for temperatures between 295 and 400 K [151]. Itoh... [Pg.195]

In crystalline semiconductors, the most common technique for the measurement of carrier mobility involves the Hall effect. However, in noncrystalline materials, experimental data are both fragmentary and anomalous (see, for example. Ref. [5]). Measured HaU mobility is typically of the order of 10 - 10 cm A /s and is frequently found to exhibit an anomalous sign reversal with respect to other properties providing information concerning the dominant charge carrier. Thus, apart from some theoretical interest, the Hall effect measurements are of minimal value in the study of macroscopic transport in amorphous semiconductors. [Pg.39]

The dielectric constant e can be estimated to be of the order of 100, and the donor concentration N can be estimated from the measured conductivity, activation energy.and Hall mobility to be of the order of 10 cm. Then W = 10 cm and L is even smaller, so that expansion of the exponential yielSs a quantum efficiency porportional to the optical absorption coefficient even for large values of a. [Pg.210]


See other pages where Hall mobility, measurement is mentioned: [Pg.324]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.752]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.119]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.71 ]




SEARCH



Hall

Hall measurement

Hall mobility

Hall mobility, measurement Holes

Hall mobility, measurement Impurities

Hall mobility, measurement Impurity concentration

Hall mobility, measurement Interface

Hall mobility, measurement electrons

Hall mobility, measurement table

Measured mobilities

Measurement of Hall mobility

© 2024 chempedia.info