Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Graphite nonporous

Graphon black, kindly furnished by the Cabot Corporation, was the adsorbent and its physical properties are listed in Table I. The term Graphon refers to Spheron 6 which had been heated to 2,700°-3,200°C. This graphitized nonporous carbon black is a unique form of carbon with uniform surface and high surface area. The Graphon samples were dried for 12 hrs. at 140°C. and stored in vacuo before use in the adsorption experiments. [Pg.72]

The above methods for obtaining D, as well as other ones, are reviewed in Refs. 3-12, and Refs. 7-9 give tables of D values for various adsorbents. For example, D is close to 3 for the highly porous silica gels and close to 2 for nonporous fumed silica and for graphitized carbon black coconut charcoal and alumina were found to have D values of 2.67 and 2.79, respectively [7]. [Pg.575]

As anode material, smooth platinum in the form of a foil or net seems to be most universally applicable [32, 33]. In nonaqueous media, platinized titanium, gold, and nonporous graphite can also be used [56]. PbO -, MnOj- or FejO -anodes do not lead to Kolbe-dimers [57], except for PbO in acetic acid [58]. [Pg.95]

There are two main varieties of carbon (i) crystalline (e.g., graphite and diamond), and (ii) amorphous. The amorphous variety consists of carbon blacks and charcoals. Carbon blacks are nonporous fine particles of carbon produced by the combustion of gaseous or liquid carbonaceous material (e.g., natural gas, acetylene, oils, resins, tar, etc.) in a limited supply of air. Charcoals are produced by the carbonization of solid carbonaceous material such as coal, wood, nut shells, sugar, synthetic resins, etc. at about 600 °C in the absence of air. The products thus formed have a low porosity, but when activated by air, chlorine, or steam, a highly porous material is produced this porous product is called activated charcoal. Chemically speaking carbon blacks and charcoals are similar, the difference being only in physical aspects. Carbon blacks find use in the rubber industry and in ink manufacture. An important use of charcoals is as adsorbents. [Pg.508]

Nonporous mono- and polycrystalline sorbents, (e.g., graphitized carbon black, NaCl). [Pg.107]

Our study of the kinetics of the reaction of carbon with steam (152) was conducted by the circulation flow method under atmospheric pressure in the temperature-range of 900-1000°C. Dilution with helium was employed to vary the sum of partial pressures of the reaction participants. The experiments were carried out with nonporous graphite of high purity (the content of admixtures did not exceed 10"5%). The roughness factor of graphite was found to be 2-2.5 (from electrochemical measurements). Equation (390) proved not to be obeyed quantitatively the results of the variation of PHl in a broad range by addition of H2 to the gas mixture at the inlet do not form a straight line in the plot 1/r11 vs. PH2 ... [Pg.278]

All of the fat-soluble vitamins, including provitamin carotenoids, exhibit some form of electrochemical activity. Both amperometry and coulometry have been applied to electrochemical detection. In amperometric detectors, only a small proportion (usually <20%) of the electroactive solute is reduced or oxidized at the surface of a glassy carbon or similar nonporous electrode in coulometric detectors, the solute is completely reduced or oxidized within the pores of a graphite electrode. The operation of an electrochemical detector requires a semiaqueous or alcoholic mobile phase to support the electrolyte needed to conduct a current. This restricts its use to reverse-phase HPLC (but not NARP) unless the electrolyte is added postcolumn. Electrochemical detection is incompatible with NARP chromatography, because the mobile phase is insufficiently polar to dissolve the electrolyte. A stringent requirement for electrochemical detection is that the solvent delivery system be virtually pulse-free. [Pg.356]

Type II isotherms are the normal forms observed for macroporous and nonporous adsorbents (i.e., N2 at 77 K on graphite, nanotubes, and carbon blacks). The type II isotherm represents unrestricted monolayer-multilayer adsorption. The point B is indicative of the stage in which the monolayer is complete and the multilayer adsorption begins. [Pg.117]

Type VI isotherms are typical of adsorbents having a very uniform nonporous surface. Each step represents an adsorbed monolayer (i.e., noble gas adsorption on graphitized carbon blacks). [Pg.118]

The BP are usually fabricated with nonporous machined graphite or corrosion-resistant metal plates. Distribution channels are engraved in these plates. Metallic foams can also be used for distributing the reactants. [Pg.391]

In view of the above points, the first choice was titanium dioxide powder, and then the various partially graphitized carbon blacks. Titanium dioxide is a nonporous material which can be obtained with a high specific surface area, and has been the object of considerable study (9, 14, 18, 29), so that not only is it known that reproducible and precise surface areas can be obtained by low temperature gas adsorption, but, in addition, the heats and entropies of adsorption by nitrogen and other gases are known. The same may be said of various carbon blacks (9, II, 17, 21, 25). These are prepared by various types of pyrolytic decomposition of... [Pg.66]

When the surface of a nonporous adsorbent is energetically uniform the isotherm may have a step-like shape (type VI). A good example of a type VI isotherm is found in the adsorption of krypton at 90 K on carbon black, graphitized at 2700°C [3], Type VI isotherms are of theoretical interest only. [Pg.423]

Figure 10.29 TGA data for UBH4 supported by different carbon supports, (a) UBH4 mixed with nonporous graphite, (b) LiBH4 incorporated into activated carbon. Curve (c) and (d) LiBH4 incorporated into carbon aerogel with average... Figure 10.29 TGA data for UBH4 supported by different carbon supports, (a) UBH4 mixed with nonporous graphite, (b) LiBH4 incorporated into activated carbon. Curve (c) and (d) LiBH4 incorporated into carbon aerogel with average...
The objective of the present work was to study and compare by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) the microporosity and mesoporosity of several different carbon materials with various types and amounts of pores highly oriented pyrolytic graphite with artificially-generated model pores, activated carbon fibers, nonporous thermally treated carbon black and nonactivated carbon fibers with an ultramicroporous texture. [Pg.530]

The results in Tables 1 and 2 reveal that the total effective micropore volume, is almost independent of the choice of carbon black and also differences of only a few percent are obtained in the corresponding values of effective ultramicropore volume. However, mueh larger differences are observed if a graphitized carbon is employed as the nonporous reference material. [Pg.425]

Isotherm I is typical of adsorption in micropores, e.g., adsorption on molecular sieves and activated carbons. Isotherm II represents multilayer physisorption on a flat surface (valid for many nonporous substances). Isotherms III and V are characteristics of weak gas-solid interactions, e.g., water adsorption on gold. Isotherm IV is frequently observed in the study of practical heterogeneous catalysts. Its shape is characteristic of multilayer adsorption accompanied by capillary condensation in mesopores. When the surface of a nonporous adsorbent is energetically uniform the isotherm may have a step-like shape (Isotherm VI). A good example of such behaviour is the adsorption isotherm of Rr at 90 K on graphite [5]. [Pg.546]

The polarization curve for silver electrodeposition from nitrate solution, 0.5 M AgN03 in 0.2M HNO3, onto a graphite electrode is shown in Fig. 15. As shown earlier,7 the polarization curves for silver deposition from nitrate solution onto a graphite electrode and on graphite covered with a nonporous surface film of silver (hence, on a massive silver electrode) are practically the same. The polarization curve in Fig. 15 is very similar to that in Fig. 7, which means that mass-transfer limitations were decreased or even eliminated. The SEM photomicrographs of the deposit corresponding to the points from Fig. 15 are shown in Fig. 16. [Pg.194]

Mineral matter contained in the coal could influence the rate of char combustion by blocking part of the coal surface or by catalytically increasing the rate of combustion. Figure 2 shows that the measured rate of combustion of purified nonporous graphites is uncertain by less than a factor of three. This is a small difference compared to the spread in the overall rate data and suggests that some of the scatter in the measured rates of coal combustion is caused by the mineral matter in the coal. [Pg.433]

The importance of adsorption for different carbon materials and, conversely, the contribution of each type of carbon to the field of adsorption is very different. This reflects the ivide variability in properties of solid carbons [1, 2], which makes their surface properties important in very different fields and for different reasons. Thus, graphite, due to its relatively simple structure, has often been used as a model material to simulate the adsorption of different molecules on its surface, or to carry out adsorption measurements on a well-controlled surface. Likewise, carbon blacks, particularly those thermally treated ( graphi-tized ), have often been used as reference nonporous adsorbents, as they only exhibit an external surface. The absence of open porosity and high chemical inertia are attributes that make glass-like carbon a material ffequendy used in... [Pg.18]

It was discussed above that for nonporous carbon materials the position of the monolayer formation peak depends on the graphitic order of the surface. In principle, this can also be used to study the graphitic order of the surface of porous carbons. The APD of OMCs synthesized at 900°C and above showed a monolayer formation peak. As these peaks are relatively wide, the APD data were fitted to a Gauss-Lorentzian function (Fig. 18.8). With increasing synthesis temperature, the monolayer formation peak became more pronounced... [Pg.465]


See other pages where Graphite nonporous is mentioned: [Pg.19]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.245]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.314 ]




SEARCH



Graphite nonporous electrode

© 2024 chempedia.info