Grafting advantage

HIPS/PEST/SBS and PS grafted advantageous set of performance characteristics Avakian et al., 1988... 

Polyurethanes as Biomaterials. Much of the progress in cardiovascular devices can be attributed to advances in preparing biostable polyurethanes. Biostable polycarbonate-based polyurethane materials such as Corethane (9) and ChronoFlex (10) offer far-reaching capabiUties to cardiovascular products. These and other polyurethane materials offer significant advantages for important long-term products, such as implantable ports, hemodialysis, and peripheral catheters pacemaker interfaces and leads and vascular grafts. 

Notable among the alternative materials are the MBS polymers, in which methyl methacrylate and styrene are grafted on to the polybutadiene backbone. This has resulted in two clear-cut advantages over ABS. The polymers could be made with high clarity and they had better resistance to discolouration in the presence of ultraviolet light. Disadvantages of MBS systems are that they have lower tensile strength and heat deflection temperature under load. 

Viewed in conjunction with the solid-like, nonvolatile nature of ionic liquids, it is apparent that TSILs can be thought of as liquid versions of solid-supported reagents. Unlike solid-supported reagents, however, TSILs possess the added advantages of kinetic mobility of the grafted functionality and an enormous operational surface area (Figure 2.3-1). It is this combination of features that makes TSILs an aspect of ionic liquids chemistry that is poised for explosive growth. 

This grafting technique proved to possess several advantages (1) the initiating macroradicals [shown in... 

Another method has recently been utilized by Kaur et al. [85] involving grafting of a vinyl monomer onto preirradiated backbone polymer by the mutual method. This method offers certain advantages over the conventional mutual method of grafting. 

Generally, a graft copolymer should offer a clear advantage over the physical blend when a high degree of incompatibility exists between the component parts. It is... 

There are a considerable number of methods available for effecting graft copolymerization onto preformed polymers, each with its own particular advantages and disadvantages. 

The advantage of this technique is that the intermediate peroxy polymers may be kept for long periods of time before performing the final grafting step. The grafting reactions using this technique can be described as follows ... 

In terms of structural control, block copolymers have considerable advantages over graft copolymers. The segment length and sequence are generally more easily controlled for block copolymers than for graft copolymers. 

The creation of active sites as well as the graft polymerization of monomers may be carried out by using radiation procedures or free-radical initiators. This review is not devoted to the consideration of polymerization mechanisms on the surfaces of porous solids. Such information is presented in a number of excellent reviews [66-68]. However, it is necessary to focus attention on those peculiarities of polymerization that result in the formation of chromatographic sorbents. In spite of numerous publications devoted to problems of composite materials produced by means of polymerization techniques, articles concerning chromatographic sorbents are scarce. As mentioned above, there are two principle processes of sorbent preparation by graft polymerization radiation-induced polymerization or polymerization by radical initiators. We will also pay attention to advantages and deficiencies of the methods. 

Currently, graft post-polymerization of monomers in the gaseous phase (2) is the more widely used process because it has at least two basic advantages. First, side processes of homopolymerization are minimized which reduces the consumption of monomers and makes unnecessary additional treatment of the modified materials with solvents. Second, this method is universal and allows the grafting to the surfaces (such as silica) to be carried out with low radiation yields of active sites as compared to the monomers. 

This method of synthesizing graft copolymers has a number of advantages, in particular ... 

The preparation of polymer brushes by controlled radical polymerization from appropriately functionalized polymer chains, surfaces or particles by a grafting from approach has recently attracted a lot of attention.742 743 The advantages of growing a polymer brush directly on a surface include well-defined grafts, when the polymerization kinetics exhibit living character, and stability due to covalent attachment of the polymer chains to the surface. Most work has used ATRP or NMP, though papers on the use of RAFT polymerization in this context also have begun to appear. 

---